Evaluation of Cardiac Substructures Dose Sparing in Single and Dual Isocenter RapidArc™ Radiotherapy Planning for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer.

Purpose This study compares the dosimetry and dose sparing of cardiac substructures in single isocenter and dual isocenter RapidArc™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, United States) radiotherapy planning for synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Methodology Six synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) patients received adjuvant radiation with the prescribed dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV) without local lymph nodal regions. PTVs and organs at risk (OARs), including both lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, heart, and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), both atria and ventricles were contoured. Single isocentric RapidArc (SIRA) and dual isocentric RapidArc (DIRA) plans were made for each patient and dosimetric differences between these two techniques were evaluated. Results There was no statistically significant difference in conformity index (CI) values between SIRA and DIRA plans, with 0.9681±0.01 and 0.9721±0.01 (p=0.505), respectively. SIRA planning showed superior homogeneity with homogeneity Index (HI) values of 0.0999±0.01 compared to DIRA planning with HI values of 0.1640±0.12 (p=0.230). The mean LAD dose of SIRA was valued higher than that of DIRA planning. Lower mean doses were obtained for both lungs in SIRA plans compared to DIRA plans. Meanwhile, doses to the right atrium, left atrium, left ventricle, right ventricle, and esophagus showed no statistical significance between these two techniques, except in the spinal cord. Conclusion Both SIRA and DIRA plans have satisfactory outcomes in sparing OARs. Meanwhile, SIRA techniques have less setup time and overall machine time.

Effect of corticosteroid ointment on radiation induced dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Almost all the patients receiving curative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer develop radiation dermatitis, which many a times leads to treatment interruption and reduce patient compliance. In this study, we evaluated the effect of potent topical steroid (Betamethasone Valerate 0.1%) cream on acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients receiving curative radiotherapy. METHODS: A total 106 patients of head and neck cancers were randomly divided into arm A (52 patients) and arm B (54 patients). The patient in study arm A were treated with topical betamethasone 0.1% twice daily during radiotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy and arm B was kept as control. The radiation reaction in both the groups was monitored weekly according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute radiation dermatitis grading. RESULTS: Out of 106 patients, 85 (80.2%) patients completed treatment. Patient in control arm had earlier onset of grade 1 reaction (5.7% in arm A vs 16.7 % in arm B at 2nd week, P value 0.157 and 28.8% in arm A vs 50% in arm B at 3rd week, P value 0.028) and progression of radiation dermatitis. In 7th week patient in arm A had higher grade 1 reaction (17.3% in arm A vs 0% in arm B), while arm B had higher grade 2 reaction (66.7% arm B vs 55.8% in arm A). There was no difference in incidence of grade 3 and 4 reaction. No difference was observed in time taken for reaction to heal. CONCLUSION: Topical Betamethasone can delay the onset and progression of radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer, without significant delay in wound healing.

Definitive radiotherapy in patients of synchronous esophageal and head and neck cancer-treatment outcome and toxicity.

AIM: The aim is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes and treatment related toxicities in patients of synchronous esophageal and head & neck cancer when treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. BACKGROUND: Patients of esophageal cancer with a synchronous second primary in head and neck region can be treated with definitive radiotherapy but the clinical outcome has been reported to be poor. METHOD AND DESIGN: This is a single institutional retrospective study. Twenty-five patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated. The survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meir method and their relations with various clinicopathologic parameters were compared. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 14 months, the 1 year and 2 year survival was 60% and 17% respectively. Significant improvement in overall survival was observed in patients with early staged esophageal cancer then locally advanced disease (P = 0.03). Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer had poor survival than with early stage disease (P = 0.06). Those who received concurrent chemotherapy had better survival than those with radiotherapy alone. 40% patients developed grade III & IV dermatitis and 48% patients developed grade III oral mucositis. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiotherapy can safely be offered to patients with synchronous esophageal and head and neck cancer.