Tolerability of high-dose topical tretinoin: the Veterans Affairs Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention Trial.

BACKGROUND: Topical tretinoin is a medication commonly used for acne that has potential application in the long-term treatment of photodamaged skin. However, there are few published data regarding the tolerability of high-dose tretinoin with long-term use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term tolerability of tretinoin 0.1% cream. METHODS: A randomized, multicentre, double-blind, controlled trial for chemoprevention of keratinocyte carcinomas (i.e. basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas) using topical tretinoin cream to the face and ears was conducted. All participants were veterans and had a history of two or more keratinocyte carcinomas over the previous 5 years. Participants were examined (by a study dermatologist) and interviewed every 6 months (for up to 5.5 years to May 2004). Treatment comprised tretinoin 0.1% cream or vehicle control cream once daily, then twice daily as tolerated. Participants were instructed to step down application frequency to once daily or less if twice daily was not tolerated. The main outcome measures were reported side-effects, frequency of cream application and attendance at study visits. Appropriate data were available for four of the six clinical sites of this trial. RESULTS: Data from 736 randomized participants (mean age 71 years; 97% men) from four clinical sites were analysed. The tretinoin group more commonly reported one or more side-effects at the 6-month follow-up than the control group (61% vs. 42%, P < 0.0001). Side-effects decreased over time in both groups, but to a greater extent in the tretinoin group, and the difference became nonsignificant at 30 months. Burning was the most common side-effect (39% tretinoin vs. 17% control, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in severity of side-effects among those affected. Of the participants who reported burning in either group, most reported mild burning; only 11% of those with burning in the tretinoin group reported it as severe (mild 62% tretinoin vs. 70% placebo; severe 11% vs. 5%; P = 0.4). Itching (24% vs. 16%, P = 0.01) and other local cutaneous reactions (12% vs. 6%, P = 0.01) were also more commonly reported by the tretinoin group at 6 months. There was no difference in numbness (2% vs. 2%, P = 0.9). Participants in the tretinoin group were less likely to apply cream twice daily at 6 months (29% vs. 43%, P = 0.0002). This difference persisted over the entire duration of follow-up. There was little difference between groups in attendance at study visits or completion of telephone interviews (92% vs. 95%, P = 0.06). No unexpected adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the tolerability level of topical tretinoin was high in this study population, with almost 40% of the tretinoin group reporting no side-effects, and the majority (67%) tolerating at least once-daily dosing at 6-month follow-up. High-dose topical tretinoin is feasible for long-term use in this population.

Reliability of counting actinic keratoses before and after brief consensus discussion: the VA topical tretinoin chemoprevention (VATTC) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of counts of actinic keratoses (AKs) and the effect of a brief joint discussion of discrepancies on that reliability. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Seven dermatologists independently counted AKs on the face and ears before and after a brief joint discussion of discrepancies. SETTING AND PATIENTS: A volunteer sample of 9 patients from the ongoing VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention (VATTC) Trial. All participating individuals are veterans and have had 2 or more keratinocyte carcinomas (basal or squamous cell carcinoma) in the 5 years before enrollment in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standard deviation of estimates of the Poisson regression parameter for the dermatologists. RESULTS: Substantial variation was found among the dermatologists in their AK counts. The SD of the parameter estimates for the dermatologists decreased from 0.45 to 0.24 after the brief joint discussion, a 47% decrease (P =.076). The variation attributable to the dermatologists also decreased substantially (chi(2)(6) decrease, 94 to 12). CONCLUSIONS: Actinic keratoses are common, and there is a continuous spectrum of lesions that ranges from sun-damaged skin to squamous cell carcinoma in situ. Clinical distinguishing features may be difficult to delineate precisely. Counts of AK are commonly performed, but appear to be unreliable, even when performed by experienced dermatologists. Joint discussion of discrepancies may enhance the reliability of these counts, although substantial variation remains. Research that relied on these counts must be reevaluated in light of the marked variation among expert observers. Future studies should consider measures to assess and enhance reliability.

Once-weekly fluconazole (450 mg) for 4, 6, or 9 months of treatment for distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail.

BACKGROUND: Fluconazole is a bis-triazole antifungal agent approved for the treatment of oropharyngeal, esophageal, and vaginal candidiasis, serious systemic candidal infections, and cryptococcal meningitis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different durations of once-weekly fluconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail caused by dermatophytes. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial, 384 patients with distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail received fluconazole, 450 mg once weekly, or placebo for 4, 6, or 9 months. For inclusion, patients were required to have mycologically confirmed distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail with a large toenail at least 25% clinically affected but having at least 2 mm of healthy nail between the nail fold and the proximal onychomycotic border. Efficacy was assessed by clinical and mycologic (microscopic and microbiologic) measures at screening, at every treatment visit starting at month 3, and at months 2, 4, and 6 after therapy. Observed or volunteered adverse events were recorded and classified at all visits. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, very significantly superior clinical and mycologic results were achieved in all fluconazole groups compared with placebo (p=0.0001). This superiority was largely maintained over 6 months of follow-up. The clinical and mycologic responses of the 9-month treatment duration were significantly superior to the 4- and 6-month durations. Similar percentages of patients in the fluconazole and placebo groups reported adverse experiences for all three durations of the study. CONCLUSION: Results of this study support the efficacy and safety of fluconazole in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail.

Selectivity and Related Measures for nth-Order Data.

Analytical figures of merit are often used as criteria to decide whether or not a given instrumental method is suitable for attacking an analytical problem. To date, figures of merit primarily exist for analytical instruments producing data indexed by one variable, i.e., first-order instruments and first-order data. Almost none exist for instruments that generate data indexed by two variables, i.e., second-order instruments and data, and none exist for instruments supplying data indexed by three or more variables, i.e., nth-order instruments and data. This paper develops practical mathematical tools that can be used to create several figures of merit for nth-order instrumentation, namely, selectivity, net analyte signal, and sensitivity. In particular, the paper fully develops a local selectivity measure for second-order instrumentation and tests its performance using simulated second-order data and real second-order data obtained by gas chromatography with Fourier transform infrared detection and liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. Also included in the paper is a brief discussion on practical uses of nth-order figures of merit.

Cetirizine and astemizole therapy for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine and astemizole have been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Cetirizine brings about clinical benefit more rapidly. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single daily doses of cetirizine and astemizole in relieving the symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria, with particular emphasis on the commencement of action. METHODS: Patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria were randomly assigned to relieve either 10 mg of cetirizine, 10 mg of astemizole, or placebo for 4 weeks in a multicenter double-blind trial. Patients rated symptom severity each night, and investigators rated symptoms weekly. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients were enrolled in the trial; 180 were included in the safety analysis and 177 were included in at least one efficacy analysis. Both cetirizine and astemizole were significantly superior to placebo in relieving symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Both patients' and investigators' ratings indicated that cetirizine acted more rapidly. Both active treatments were well tolerated, and the incidence of somnolence did not differ statistically between cetirizine (14.5%) and astemizole (10.3%). CONCLUSION: Both cetirizine and astemizole provide effective relief of the symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria with similar side-effect profiles. However, clinical benefit occurs significantly more rapidly with cetirizine.

Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria.

The efficacy and safety of a new non-sedating antihistamine, loratadine (Clarityn, CAS 79794-75-5) 10 mg q.d., was compared to the classical antihistamine, hydroxyzine 25 mg t.i.d. and placebo in a 4-week (optional 12 week) randomized, double-blind, multi-center study in 203 patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Efficacy evaluations included weekly physician and patient assessments of pruritus, overall disease condition, and therapeutic response to treatment. Loratadine and hydroxyzine were significantly more effective than placebo and clinically comparable to each other as measured by all efficacy evaluations at each visit. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated with sedation and dry mouth similar to placebo and significantly less than hydroxyzine.

Retinoids: uses and abuses.

There is no doubt that modern retinoids are a two-edged sword. While they appear to normalize many abnormal biologic processes, i.e. modulate cellular differentiation and cellular proliferation, at the same time they can severely "abnormalize" other processes, i.e. embryonic organogenesis. Pharmaceutical ingenuity in separating their toxicity from their efficacy will determine their ultimate value to the therapist.

Urticaria: clinical efficacy of cetirizine in comparison with hydroxyzine and placebo.

Chronic urticaria is a problem for both physician and patient. In an effort to avoid the risks associated with corticosteroid treatment, many first-generation H1-receptor antagonists have been tried and found to induce undesirable levels of sedation when given in amounts sufficient to control urticaria. Cetirizine, a pharmacologically active oxidized metabolite of hydroxyzine, was developed to provide selective H1-receptor inhibition without depression of the central nervous system. In a 4-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study, cetirizine, in a once-a-day dose (5 to 20 mg), was equivalent in efficacy to hydroxyzine in divided doses (25 to 75 mg/day). The incidence of somnolence in the cetirizine group was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. However, in the hydroxyzine group, the incidence of somnolence was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (p = 0.001). The results of this study demonstrate that cetirizine has a greater safety margin over the older parent drug hydroxyzine.

Personality factors as predictors of therapeutic response to cryosurgery in patients with warts.

Fifty patients with warts were treated with cryotherapy and given a 100-item questionnaire, The Tennessee Self-Concept Scale, to complete. Responses from 42 patients on whom follow-up data were available were subjected to computer analysis. The answers to eight of the questions differed significantly between treatment cures (23) and treatment failures (19). Further analysis of two of the eight questions showed that it may be possible to use them to predict cryosurgical treatment success or failure in up to 100% of cases.