A Comparative Study on Short-Term Effects of Compression Orthosis and Exercises in the Treatment of Pectus Carinatum: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pectus carinatum (PC) is a congenital chest wall deformity which is characterized by the protrusion of the sternum and costal cartilages. Although orthotic and exercise therapies are commonly offered by physicians for PC treatment, there is a lack of evidence on the benefits of exercises and how long the orthosis should be worn. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects and feasibility of custom-made compression orthosis and exercises in the treatment of PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with PC aged 7 to 17 years old were randomized into three groups: compression orthosis 23 hours, compression orthosis 8 hours, and control group. All groups received exercises for 1 hour a day for 3 weeks. Additionally, compression orthosis 23 hours group wore the orthosis for 23 hours a day, while compression orthosis 8 hours group wore the orthosis for 8 hours a day. PC protrusion, pressure of correction, thorax lateral and anteroposterior parameters, external chest wall measurements, and Nuss Questionnaire were evaluated before and after the treatment. Also, adverse effects, retention, and compliance were assessed. Feasibility was evaluated by calculating the percentages of recruitment, retention, and safety. RESULTS: The compression orthosis 23 hours group showed greater improvements than the other groups. After treatment, all groups showed significant changes in protrusion, pressure of correction, and external chest wall measurements. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency across groups. Retention percentages did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION: Compression orthosis use for 23 hours can be recommended rather than its use for 8 hours because 23 hours of orthosis use has better correction and similar adverse effects.

The Effect of Therapeutic Exercises on Balance, Quality of Life, and Pain in Patients Who Were Receiving Neurotoxic Chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of lower limb strengthening and balance exercises on balance, quality of life and neuropathic pain of the cancer patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. DESIGN: Patients who were planning to receive neurotoxic chemotherapy agents were included in the first group. They were trained before the neurotoxic chemotherapy sessions with the 10-wk home-based exercise program including lower limb strengthening and balance exercises. The second group of patients who had received the third cycle of neurotoxic chemotherapy had no exercise program. Both groups were evaluated after the third cycle. Neurocom Balance Master and Berg Balance Scale were used to evaluate balance. The neuropathic pain was questioned by PainDETECT questionnaire and the quality of life was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty patients were admitted to this study. Twenty-four patients were in the exercise group (F = 14, M = 10) and 36 patients were in the control group (F = 17, M = 19). Sociodemographic and clinical data of both groups were similar. Berg Balance Scale (P = 0.005), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire global quality of life, physical function, and emotional status were higher, and symptom scores and PainDETECT questionnaire score were lower in the exercise group (P < 0.05). Balance tests were different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening and balance exercises have a valuable effect on balance, quality of life, and neuropathic pain in patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy.