Using Existing Clinical Information Models for Dutch Quality Registries to Reuse Data and Follow COUMT Paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Reuse of health care data for various purposes, such as the care process, for quality measurement, research, and finance, will become increasingly important in the future; therefore, "Collect Once Use Many Times" (COUMT). Clinical information models (CIMs) can be used for content standardization. Data collection for national quality registries (NQRs) often requires manual data entry or batch processing. Preferably, NQRs collect required data by extracting data recorded during the health care process and stored in the electronic health record. OBJECTIVES: The first objective of this study was to analyze the level of coverage of data elements in NQRs with developed Dutch CIMs (DCIMs). The second objective was to analyze the most predominant DCIMs, both in terms of the coverage of data elements as well as in their prevalence across existing NQRs. METHODS: For the first objective, a mapping method was used which consisted of six steps, ranging from a description of the clinical pathway to a detailed mapping of data elements. For the second objective, the total number of data elements that matched with a specific DCIM was counted and divided by the total number of evaluated data elements. RESULTS: An average of 83.0% (standard deviation: 11.8%) of data elements in studied NQRs could be mapped to existing DCIMs . In total, 5 out of 100 DCIMs were needed to map 48.6% of the data elements. CONCLUSION: This study substantiates the potential of using existing DCIMs for data collection in Dutch NQRs and gives direction to further implementation of DCIMs. The developed method is applicable to other domains. For NQRs, implementation should start with the five DCIMs that are most prevalently used in the NQRs. Furthermore, a national agreement on the leading principle of COUMT for the use and implementation for DCIMs and (inter)national code lists is needed.

Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care.

The Choosing Wisely campaign began in the USA in 2012 to encourage physicians and patients to discuss inappropriate and potentially harmful tests, treatments and procedures. Since its inception, the campaign has grown substantially and has been adopted by 12 countries around the world. Of great interest to countries implementing the campaign, is the effectiveness of Choosing Wisely to reduce overutilisation. This article presents an integrated measurement framework that may be used to assess the impact of a Choosing Wisely campaign on physician and provider awareness and attitudes on low-value care, provider practice behaviour and overuse of low-value services.

'Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign.

Much attention has been paid to the inappropriate underuse of tests and treatments but until recently little attention has focused on the overuse that does not add value for patients and may even cause harm. Choosing Wisely is a campaign to engage physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests, treatments and procedures. The campaign began in the United States in 2012, in Canada in 2014 and now many countries around the world are adapting the campaign and implementing it. This article describes the present status of Choosing Wisely programs in 12 countries. It articulates key elements, a set of five principles, and describes the challenges countries face in the early phases of Choosing Wisely. These countries plan to continue collaboration including developing metrics to measure overuse.

Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug-drug interactions: a literature review.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the incidence of adverse patient outcomes due to drug-drug interactions (D-DIs), the type of drugs involved and the underlying reason. As a proxy for adverse patient outcomes, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions and re-hospitalisations were assessed. METHODS: A literature search in the Medline and Embase database (1990-2006) was performed and references were tracked. An overall cumulative incidence was estimated by dividing the sum of the cases by the sum of the study populations. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were found assessing the relationship between D-DIs and ED-visits, hospitalisations or re-hospitalisations. The studies with a large study size showed low incidences and vice versa. D-DIs were held responsible for 0.054% of the ED-visits, 0.57% of the hospital admissions and 0.12% of the re-hospitalisations. In the elderly population, D-DIs were held responsible for 4.8% of the admissions. Drugs most often involved were NSAIDs and cardiovascular drugs. The reasons for admissions or ED-visits, which were most often found were GI-tract bleeding, hyper- or hypotension and cardiac rhythm disturbances. CONCLUSION: This review provides information on the overall incidence of D-DIs as a cause of adverse patient outcomes, although there is still uncertainty about the impact of D-DIs on adverse patient outcomes. Our results suggest that a limited number of drugs are involved in the majority of cases and that the number of reasons for admission as a consequence of D-DIs seems to be modest.

Determinants of potential drug-drug interaction associated dispensing in community pharmacies in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: There are many drug-drug interactions (D-DI) of which some may cause severe adverse patient outcomes. Dispensing interacting drug combinations should be avoided when the risks are higher than the benefits. The objective of this study was to identify determinants of dispensing undesirable interacting drug combinations by community pharmacies in the Netherlands. METHODS: A total of 256 Dutch community pharmacies were selected, based on the dispensing of 11 undesirable interacting drug combinations between January 1st, 2001 and October 31st, 2002. These pharmacies were sent a questionnaire by the Inspectorate for Health Care (IHC) concerning their process and structure characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of times the 11 undesirable interacting drug combinations were dispensed. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six questionnaires (response rate 96.1%) were completed. Dispensing determinants were only found for the D-DI between macrolide antibiotics and digoxin but not for the other 10 D-DIs. Pharmacies using different medication surveillance systems differed in the dispensing of this interacting drug combination, and pharmacies, which were part of a health care centre dispensed this interacting drug combination more often. CONCLUSION: Medication surveillance in Dutch community pharmacies seems to be effective. Although for most D-DIs no determinants were found, process and structure characteristics may have consequences for the dispensing of undesirable interacting drug combinations.

Feasibility first: developing public performance indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals.

This paper describes the development and implementation of the first national, public and obligatory set of hospital performance indicators in the Netherlands. Focusing on effectiveness and safety, the set was developed by the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their task: monitoring the quality of the care delivered by providers. In addition, the set would enhance the transparency of the hospital sector, and stimulate individual hospitals to improve their scores. Bridging some of the classic distinctions between 'internal' and 'external' indicators, the Inspectorate's vision was to rapidly produce a feasible set of indicators that would fulfill these aims, while maximally preventing 'side effects' such as misinterpretations, defensive or perverse reactions. Explicitly avoiding the trap of searching for exhaustive validity of the indicators, the inspectorate's motto was 'feasability first'. This paper describes how this simultaneously philosophical, political and pragmatic strategy played out successfully, and how the indicator set was ultimately embraced by all parties involved.

Potential determinants of drug-drug interaction associated dispensing in community pharmacies.

Although the number of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is probably low, DDIs may be responsible for a substantial number of hospital admissions. In some countries, the pharmacist is responsible for preventing the use of unsafe or non-effective drug regimens. Specifically they should avoid the dispensing of combinations of drugs that may cause serious DDIs. In order to assess the determinants related to community pharmacies and associated with these dispensings, a systematic literature review was conducted. Medline and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched for articles published in English between 1993 and 2003. Additional relevant articles were identified by screening the reference lists of relevant articles. Seven papers were located. The determinants described in the literature were divided into three groups. The first group focussed on the relationship between the pharmacist and the prescriber. The number of prescribers is of importance as well as the number of dispensing pharmacies. Both a high number of primary care physicians and multiple dispensing pharmacies increased the risk of DDIs. The availability, quality and sensitivity of the medication surveillance software appeared to be a second important determinant. Both too many and too few signals increased the risk of dispensing interacting drugs. The third group of determinants was related to the pharmacist and pharmacy organisation. Signals from the surveillance program are usually judged first by technicians and subsequently managed by the pharmacist. Consequently, knowledge, instructions and supervision are important determinants. A fourth group of determinants was identified in literature assessing interventions by pharmacists, including interventions for DDIs. A higher workload was associated with lower intervention rates, which indicated a higher risk of dispensing interacting drugs. The determinants identified in this review can be used to develop strategies to minimise patient harm resulting from DDIs. Further assessment of the relation between these determinants and the dispensing of DDIs and of the relation between DDI-associated dispensing and patient harm is recommended.

Long-term exposure to silicone breast implants does not induce antipolymer antibodies.

The focus of our studies was to determine whether the antipolymer antibody assay (APA) as an objective laboratory assay could contribute to the diagnosis in women with a silicone breast implant (SBI) and complaints/symptomatic disease. We investigated whether a population of symptomatic SBI recipients exists with a high prevalence of APA in the Netherlands. The study participants were selected based on self-reported complaints. In one study their physician was approached for additional information on their disease status. Two groups of 42 women were included in the studies, with a mean SBI exposure of 17 and 16 years, respectively. The participants were clinically examined, and the APA level in serum samples determined. The study population of SBI recipients was categorised in severity subgroups based on the functional capacity, and the study physicians general assessment of pain and disease activity. Positive APA levels were found in 10% of the SBI recipients. Also in control groups 8% showed a positive APA response. After categorisation most (65 of 84) SBI recipients belonged to the limited severity subgroup on an increasing scale of limited, mild, moderate and advanced. Eight were categorised in the mild, four in the moderate, and seven in the advanced severity subgroup. None of the APA positive women were found to belong to the moderate or advanced severity subgroup. Seven of the APA positive women belonged to the limited, and one woman to the mild severity subgroup. In conclusion, we were unable to include a large proportion of severely symptomatic SBI recipients in our study populations. So, we cannot confirm the results of Tenenbaum et al. [1] on the presence of APA in symptomatic SBI recipients. However, our failure in two separate studies to recruit symptomatic SBI recipients suggests that the population of severely symptomatic SBI recipients in the Netherlands is rather small. The number of APA positive responses in our study population was low. In addition, also in the normal population a similar low percentage of positively reacting women were observed. Hence, we cannot recommend the use of the APA assay for diagnostic purposes in the clinical evaluation of SBI recipients with severe complaints/symptoms.