Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 46(10): 4647-4659, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34136936

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the respective diagnostic value of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® for characterizing FLLs as benign or malignant and the corresponding safety. METHODS: This prospective Phase 3 study was conducted at 17 centres in China and Korea (May 2014 to April 2015); 424 patients (20 to 80 years) with at least 1 untreated focal liver lesion (FLL) (< 10 cm in diameter) underwent a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination (218 received Sonazoid of 0.12 µL microbubbles/kg; 206 received SonoVue of 2.4 mL). Three independent blinded readers evaluated pre- and post-contrast images characterising the FLLs as benign or malignant. RESULTS: Sonazoid-enhanced and SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound provided a statistically significant improvement in specificity for all 3 readers comparing to unenhanced ultrasound (for Sonazoid: p = 0.0093, < 0.0001, 0.0011; for SonoVue: p = 0.002, 0.03, 0.12, respectively). Difference in accuracy improvement between the 2 groups was within the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20% for all 3 readers (6.1%, 95% CI: - 5.0 to 17.2; - 7.5%, 95% CI: - 18.4 to 3.5; - 0.3%, 95% CI: - 11.3 to 10.7). The diagnostic confidence level for all 3 readers increased with post-contrast images relative to pre-contrast images. Both contrast agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Results showed a similar efficacy for Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in diagnosing FLLs as benign or malignant, and underlined the benefit of CEUS imaging over unenhanced ultrasound imaging in reaching a confident diagnosis without having to refer patients for additional imaging exams.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Liver Neoplasms , Ferric Compounds , Humans , Iron , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Oxides , Phospholipids , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sulfur Hexafluoride , Ultrasonography
2.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 818: 231-54, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25001540

ABSTRACT

Gene therapy delivery using viral vectors has demonstrated efficient transfection but has safety issues. The need for safer yet effective delivery systems has led to the active development of non-viral techniques. In this chapter, we will discuss two evolving techniques - sonoporation with microbubble contrast agents and electroporation with focus on their basic principle, parameters affecting delivery efficiency, current evolving techniques and future prospects.


Subject(s)
Electrochemotherapy/methods , Genetic Vectors , Transfection/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Animals , Electrochemotherapy/instrumentation , Humans , Transfection/instrumentation , Ultrasonography/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...