Death Pronouncement: Preparing Incoming Residents for Duties When Life Ends.

Introduction Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) prepares future residents for many aspects of medical practice, but it is rarely all-inclusive. Death pronouncement (DP), a highly important aspect of clinical training for residents, seems to be inadequately addressed and taught in undergraduate institutions. Studies have indicated that most first-year residents received minimal DP training and felt unprepared for this duty. Despite being a challenging situation, a formal teaching course is not universally taught, with most institutions merely delivering point-of-care DP instruction to medical trainees provided by supervising faculty, senior residents, and nurses. Our primary objective was to provide formal education in Duties When Life Ends (DWLE), with the goal of enhancing familiarity, knowledge, and confidence in addressing the circumstances surrounding death for graduating medical students transitioning to residency. Methods As a part of a Transition to Residency (TTR) course for students entering nonsurgical specialties, we developed a curriculum to provide formal education to fourth-year medical students in DWLE that included a two-hour didactic session delivered virtually, followed by an in-person simulation session. The didactic session covered the history, processes of DP, death physical examination, identification of medical examiner (ME) case, education on how to deliver death news to family, information about autopsies and organ donation, distinction between the cause and mechanism of death, and documentation of death notes and certificates, as well as provider self-reflection and appropriate coping mechanisms for patient death. In the 45-minute simulation, students were divided into small groups and given a case summary. During the first half, they performed a physical examination and a verbal pronouncement on cadavers, followed by an interactive small group session where students reviewed the case and worked to identify the cause of death, determine if the death was a medical examiner's case, deliver death news to the family, and complete a death progress note and certificate. Pre- and post-session questionnaires were administered, assessing three components: process familiarity, knowledge, and confidence. Finally, participants assessed course usefulness and had a free response opportunity for comments and feedback.  Results Overall, 198 students participated in all sessions, with 182 completing both pre- and post-session questionnaires. Pre-survey revealed that 70% of participants reported witnessing DP previously, with only 20% being familiar with the process of DP and 6% with documentation. Following the intervention, a comparison of the pre- and post-course questionnaires assessing process familiarity, knowledge, and confidence using a five-point Likert scale demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the mean scores in all three domains, with reported course usefulness of 96%. Conclusion A DWLE curriculum, as a part of the TTR course, was effective in improving self-reported familiarity, knowledge, and confidence regarding physician duties associated with patient death. The curriculum was well received by students. The incorporation of DWLE curriculum into TTR courses allows for vital preparation and education in the duties related to patient death. This may make a stressful process somewhat less stressful and may aid future physicians in developing competence in conducting these final physician duties.

Idiopathic portal vein thrombosis not related to hepatic disease or malignancy.

Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disorder defined by the sudden occlusion of the portal vein, which could be partial or complete. Prothrombotic states, inherited or acquired, are thought to be the cause in patients without cirrhosis or malignancy. However, the aetiology of some cases remains idiopathic despite a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach. The initial diagnostic modality to confirm PVT is either contrast-enhanced abdominal (CT) or MRI; as it can identify predisposing factors, and detect evidence of complications. Eliciting the underlying aetiology is critical to guide overall management and prevent future recurrence. The purpose of treatment is to stop thrombus extension and achieve portal vein patency by anticoagulation to optimise outcomes. Herein, we present an unusual case of spontaneous PVT in a young woman. We will also discuss the evaluation of patients without obvious aetiology.

Cerebellar ataxia a unique initial presentation of Legionnaires' disease.

We present a case of Legionnaires' disease complicated by cerebellar ataxia. A 60-year-old man was diagnosed with Legionnaires' disease by urine antigen after presenting to the hospital with a main problem of headache and gait instability. He also had a productive cough, as well as nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Initial physical examination revealed a positive Romberg test, positive pronator drift, severely unsteady gait and bilateral upper extremity resting tremors with the remainder of cranial nerves and neurological examination being unremarkable. The patient had a prolonged hospital course requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. He received 14 days of levofloxacin with resolution of the pneumonia. On repeat assessment prior to discharge, the patient's neurological symptoms improved; however, he still had mild residual gait instability, dysdiadokinesia and difficulty with fine motor tasks such as writing. Romberg test remained positive.

The Impact of Hospital Teaching Status on Colonoscopy Perforation Risk: A National Inpatient Sample Study.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy has been widely used as a diagnostic tool for many conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy complications include perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain, as well as anesthesia risk. Although rare, perforation is the most dangerous complication that occurs in the immediate post-colonoscopy period with an estimated risk of less than 0.1%. Studies on colonoscopy perforation risk between teaching hospitals and non-teaching hospitals are scarce. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent inpatient colonoscopy between January 2010 and December 2014 in teaching versus non-teaching facilities in order to study their perforation rates. Our study population included 257,006 patients. Univariate regression was performed, and the positive results were analyzed using a multivariate regression module. RESULTS: Teaching hospitals had a higher risk of perforation (odds ratio 1.23, confidence interval 1.07 - 1.42, P = 0.004). Perforation rates were higher in females, patients with inflammatory bowel disease and dilatation of strictures. Polypectomy did not yield any statistical difference between the study groups. Other factors such as African-American ethnicity appeared to have a lower risk. CONCLUSION: Perforation rates are higher in teaching hospitals. More studies are needed to examine the difference and how to mitigate the risks.

Variations in Screening Adenoma Detection Rate by Specialty of Physicians in a Predominately African American Population.

BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy aims to interrupt the adenoma-carcinoma sequence by removing all precancerous adenomatous polyps. Adenomatous polyp detection rate (ADR) can vary between endoscopists as well as between race, age, and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to compare ADR among academic gastroenterologists (A-GI), non-A-GI, and surgeons for endoscopies performed in the same endoscopic suite of a large medical center with a predominately African American (AA) population. METHODS: All screening colonoscopies performed in 2014 for patients aged 62-76 years were identified using the electronic medical records data. Patients with average risk and high risk of CRC defined as having a 'personal history of polyps' or 'family history of CRC', and history of ulcerative colitis and Fecal Occult Blood Test/Fecal Immunochemical Test (FOBT/FIT) positivity were included. Patients with incomplete colonoscopy (defined as failing to achieve cecal intubation or poor preparation) and unrecovered tissue biopsy were excluded. ADR was calculated for three groups of endoscopists: A-GIs, non-A-GIs, and surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 573 screening colonoscopies was analyzed. The endoscopists comprised five A-GIs, eight non-A-GIs, and six surgeons. The majority of patients were of AA decent (71%), female (54%) with an average age of 66 years. Patients classified as average risk comprised 79% of the population. Most of the colonoscopies were performed by A-GI (n=339), followed by non-A-GI (n=144), and surgeons (n=90). The ADR for A-GI was 50% as compared to 32% for non-A-GI (p<0.001) and 25% for surgeons (p<0.001). Also, A-GI were more likely to identify ≥3 adenomas during screening colonoscopies. Significant differences were observed (p<0.001) in the mean time of colonoscopy for A-GI (30 mins) non-A-G (14 mins), and surgeons (18 mins). CONCLUSION: Significant variation in the ADR between endoscopists belonging to different specialties were observed. Although all appear to achieve acceptable ADR (ie at least 25 for men and 15 for women), academic gastroenterologists had better performance than non-academic GI and surgeons. This may be explained by a significantly longer average duration of procedures for the highest ADR group.