Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 45(2): 342-351, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918502

ABSTRACT

Comparing mental health systems across countries is difficult because of the lack of an agreed upon terminology covering services and related financing issues. Within the European Union project REFINEMENT, international mental health care experts applied an innovative mixed "top-down" and "bottom-up" approach following a multistep design thinking strategy to compile a glossary on mental health systems, using local services as pilots. The final REFINEMENT glossary consisted of 432 terms related to service provision, service utilisation, quality of care and financing. The aim of this study was to describe the iterative process and methodology of developing this glossary.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Health/classification , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Terminology as Topic , Europe , Humans
2.
Health Policy ; 115(2-3): 172-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24462342

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to perform a cross-country comparison of cancer treatment costs in the Nordic countries, and to demonstrate the added value of decomposing documented costs in interpreting national differences. The study is based on individual-level data from national patient and prescription drug registers, and data on cancer prevalence from the NORDCAN database. Hospital costs were estimated on the basis of information on diagnosis-related groups (DRG) cost weights and national unit costs. Differences in per capita costs were decomposed into two stages: stage one separated the price and volume components, and stage two decomposed the volume component, relating the level of activity to service needs and availability. Differences in the per capita costs of cancer treatment between the Nordic countries may be as much as 30 per cent. National differences in the costs of treatment mirror observed differences in total health care costs. Differences in health care costs between countries may relate to different sources of variation with different policy implications. Comparisons of per capita spending alone can be misleading if the purpose is to evaluate, for example, differences in service provision and utilisation. The decomposition analysis helps to identify the relative influence of differences in the prevalence of cancer, service utilisation and productivity.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/economics , Denmark/epidemiology , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups/statistics & numerical data , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Norway/epidemiology , Prevalence , Registries , Sweden/epidemiology
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 218, 2013 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23768163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The harmonization of European health systems brings with it a need for tools to allow the standardized collection of information about medical care. A common coding system and standards for the description of services are needed to allow local data to be incorporated into evidence-informed policy, and to permit equity and mobility to be assessed. The aim of this project has been to design such a classification and a related tool for the coding of services for Long Term Care (DESDE-LTC), based on the European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS). METHODS: The development of DESDE-LTC followed an iterative process using nominal groups in 6 European countries. 54 researchers and stakeholders in health and social services contributed to this process. In order to classify services, we use the minimal organization unit or "Basic Stable Input of Care" (BSIC), coded by its principal function or "Main Type of Care" (MTC). The evaluation of the tool included an analysis of feasibility, consistency, ontology, inter-rater reliability, Boolean Factor Analysis, and a preliminary impact analysis (screening, scoping and appraisal). RESULTS: DESDE-LTC includes an alpha-numerical coding system, a glossary and an assessment instrument for mapping and counting LTC. It shows high feasibility, consistency, inter-rater reliability and face, content and construct validity. DESDE-LTC is ontologically consistent. It is regarded by experts as useful and relevant for evidence-informed decision making. CONCLUSION: DESDE-LTC contributes to establishing a common terminology, taxonomy and coding of LTC services in a European context, and a standard procedure for data collection and international comparison.


Subject(s)
Clinical Coding/standards , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Databases, Factual , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Europe , Humans , Long-Term Care/classification , Long-Term Care/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...