State-wide situation analysis of availability of basic resuscitation devices and essential drugs in primary and secondary healthcare facilities in Cross River State, Nigeria.

Introduction: Provision of Basic Life Support (BLS) to victims of cardiac arrest and other common causes of sudden death, is a key function of healthcare systems. Such life-saving service, which is lacking in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), is highly dependent on consistent availability of BLS devices and essential drugs. These devices are used to secure airway, deliver oxygen, gain intravenous access for infusions, provide cardiac defibrillation and monitor the cardiorespiratory systems. This study was aimed at evaluating the current state of availability of these devices and essential drugs in healthcare facilities in a developing country setting, within the context of urgent need to curb increasing burden of preventable sudden death. Methods: descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed to assess availability of each of the aforementioned subgroups of resuscitation devices and drugs, in each primary and secondary healthcare facility in all eighteen (18) Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Cross River State, in Southern Nigeria. Quantitative data was obtained using structured proforma, which was used to document presence and quantity of physically seen device(s) and drugs in each facility. The proportion of health facilities with presence of the devices and drugs, was compared between the three districts using chi-square test. P-value was set at 0.05. Results: two hundred and five (205) health care facilities across the eighteen (18) LGAs of Cross River State were assessed. Approximately one-tenth of health facilities had oropharyngeal airway (10.2%) and laryngoscope (9.3%). Only 5.4% and 3.9% had nasopharyngeal and endotracheal tubes, respectively. None of all of these airway devices was found in all health facilities within four LGAs (22.2%). The most commonly available breathing device was self-inflation bag (SIB), which was found in 51.7% of facilities. Seven LGAs (38.9%) had all of their health facilities not having either oxygen delivery devices, oxygen supply or both. Most health facilities had each of the IV access devices and infusion fluids, but only five facilities had automated external defibrillator (AED). Most health facilities had stethoscope (91.2%) and sphygmomanometer (72.2%), but only 15.1% and 9.3% had pulse oximeter and airway nebulizer, respectively. Less than one-fifth (18.5%) of facilities had atropine, and only 3.9% had amiodarone. Except for amiodarone, there was significantly higher proportion of health facilities that had each of the other essential drugs, in northern compared with other districts (p<0.05). Conclusion: devices and essential drugs required for provision of resuscitation are lacking in most health facilities in Cross River State. This situation significantly limits the health system's capacity to save lives, especially during emergencies. The implications of these state-wide findings, as well as modalities and options for improvement in availability of these essential devices and drugs are discussed in this article.

Establishing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Survey of Suggestions Made by Health Care Workers in Cross River State, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Rising trend in Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in developing countries often result in sudden death, which are largely preventable through effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Most communities in Sub-Saharan Africa, however, lack access to CPR services, due to a deficiency in requirements for the establishment of such services. These requirements can be grouped into a triad of awareness, infrastructure and capacity building. AIM: This study was aimed at assessing the perceived need and recommendations for improvement in CPR services in Cross River State. METHODS: Proportionate sampling was used to recruit healthcare workers in this cross-sectional study. Data was obtained using semi-structured open-ended questionnaire consisting of recommendations for improving CPR services. Responses were coded and grouped into three essential areas. Data were entered and analysed using SPSS version 20.0. RESULT: Two hundred and twenty-nine (229) questionnaires were completed; mean age of respondents was 42.1 ± 11.2 years. The commonest cadre of healthcare worker was nurses (135, 59.0%). One, two, and three areas of suggestions were made by 55.5%, 37.1%, and 7.4% of respondents, respectively. Suggestions included training of health care workers on CPR (111, 48.5%) and provision of resuscitation equipment (95, 41.5%). Sixty-five respondents (29.3%) recommended creating awareness and means of contact, while some respondents recommended capacity building (132, 57.6%) and resuscitation infrastructure set-up (149, 65.1%). CONCLUSION: Healthcare workers perceive an urgent need for the establishment of CPR services in our health facilities and communities. There is need to address the triad of awareness, infrastructure and capacity building for the establishment of CPR services peculiar to Sub-Saharan Africa.