A new prognostic histopathologic classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) conveys little prognostic information. This study aimed to propose an NPC histopathologic classification that can potentially be used to predict prognosis and treatment response. METHODS: We initially developed a histopathologic classification based on the morphologic traits and cell differentiation of tumors of 2716 NPC patients who were identified at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) (training cohort). Then, the proposed classification was applied to 1702 patients (retrospective validation cohort) from hospitals outside SYSUCC and 1613 patients (prospective validation cohort) from SYSUCC. The efficacy of radiochemotherapy and radiotherapy modalities was compared between the proposed subtypes. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 5-year OS rates for all NPC patients who were diagnosed with epithelial carcinoma (EC; 3708 patients), mixed sarcomatoid-epithelial carcinoma (MSEC; 1247 patients), sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC; 823 patients), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 253 patients) were 79.4%, 70.5%, 59.6%, and 42.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate models, patients with MSEC had a shorter OS than patients with EC (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.27-1.62), SC (HR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.76-2.28), or SCC (HR = 4.23, 95% CI = 3.34-5.38). Radiochemotherapy significantly improved survival compared with radiotherapy alone for patients with EC (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.56-0.80), MSEC (HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.49-0.75), and possibly for those with SCC (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.40-0.98), but not for patients with SC (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification offers more information for the prediction of NPC prognosis compared with the WHO classification and might be a valuable tool to guide treatment decisions for subtypes that are associated with a poor prognosis.

Management outcome of NPC-related and non-NPC-related brain abscess in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To review the patient profile, management outcome and prognostic factors of brain abscess; (2) To compare the neurological outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)-related brain abscess with non-NPC related brain abscess. METHOD: Retrospective review of consecutive patients diagnosed (radiologically and/or microbiologically) with brain abscess in a regional neurosurgical center in Hong Kong over a nine year period. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were recruited into this study. There were 37 male and 17 female patients. Eighteen (33%) patients had previous radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Only 31 (57%) patients had fever on presentation. White cell count and/or C-reactive protein, was raised in 41 (76%) patients on admission. Surgical drainage was carried out in 49 (91%) patients, either by aspiration through a craniotomy, by drainage with corticotomy, or excision of the abscess. Abscess culture was positive in 45 (83%) patients. Common organisms isolated included Streptococcus species (35%) and Peptostreptococcus species (18%). Anaerobes were isolated in 50% of the NPC-related abscesses. The mean follow-up time was 34 months. At the 6 months interval, 24 (44%) patients had good recovery. Favorable outcome was achieved in 30 (55%) patients. NPC-related brain abscess was associated with unfavorable neurological outcome (33%, p = 0.04). There was also a trend towards higher in-patient mortality in patients with NPC-related brain abscess (22%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Brain abscess carried a substantial morbidity and mortality despite aggressive surgical and medical treatment. Patients with NPC-related brain abscess had a higher mortality and unfavorable neurological outcome.

Eight-signature classifier for prediction of nasopharyngeal [corrected] carcinoma survival.

PURPOSE: Currently, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) prognosis evaluation is based primarily on the TNM staging system. This study aims to identify prognostic markers for NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We detected expression of 18 biomarkers by immunohistochemistry in NPC tumors from 209 patients and evaluated the association between gene expression level and disease-specific survival (DSS). We used support vector machine (SVM)--based methods to develop a prognostic classifier for NPC (NPC-SVM classifier). Further validation of the NPC-SVM classifier was performed in an independent cohort of 1,059 patients. RESULTS: The NPC-SVM classifier integrated patient sex and the protein expression level of seven genes, including Epstein-Barr virus latency membrane protein 1, CD147, caveolin-1, phospho-P70S6 kinase, matrix metalloproteinase 11, survivin, and secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine. The NPC-SVM classifier distinguished patients with NPC into low- and high-risk groups with significant differences in 5-year DSS in the evaluated patients (87% v 37.7%; P < .001) in the validation cohort. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, TNM stage, and histologic subtype, the NPC-SVM classifier was an independent predictor of 5-year DSS in the evaluated patients (hazard ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.0 to 7.9) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: As a powerful predictor of 5-year DSS among patients with NPC, the newly developed NPC-SVM classifier based on tumor-associated biomarkers will facilitate patient counseling and individualize management of patients with NPC.

Radiation injury of the parotid glands during treatment for head and neck cancer: assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

The parotid gland is an important organ at risk of complications of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. In this study, we examined the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for assessment of radiation injury to the parotid glands. DCE-MRI was performed before and 3 months after radiotherapy in patients treated for head and neck cancer. DCE-MRI was analyzed using the pharmacokinetic model proposed by Tofts and Kermode to produce three DCE parameters: k(trans), v(e) and v(p). These parameters were correlated with the dose of radiation delivered to the parotid glands and the degree of radiation-induced parotid atrophy. The mean radiation dose received by the parotid glands was 47.1 ± 6.6 Gy. All patients received concurrent chemotherapy. There was a significant rise in all three parameters after therapy (P < 0.0001). Baseline v(e) and v(p) and the post-treatment rise in v(e) correlated with parotid gland atrophy (P  =  0.0008, 0.0003 and 0.0022, respectively). DCE-MRI has the potential to be used as a non-invasive technique for predicting and assessing radiation injury in the parotid glands.

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy with other stereotactic techniques for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients can be salvaged by reirradiation with a substantial degree of radiation-related complications. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is widely used in this regard because of its rapid dose falloff and high geometric precision. The aim of this study was to examine whether the newly developed intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) has any dosimetric advantages over three other stereotactic techniques, including circular arc (CARC), static conformal beam (SmMLC), and dynamic conformal arc (mARC), in treating locally recurrent NPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography images of 32 patients with locally recurrent NPC, previously treated with SRT, were retrieved from the stereotactic planning system for contouring and computing treatment plans. Treatment planning of each patient was performed for the four treatment techniques: CARC, SmMLC, mARC, and IMSRT. The conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) of the planning target volume (PTV) and doses to the organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue were compared. RESULTS: All four techniques delivered adequate doses to the PTV. IMSRT, SmMLC, and mARC delivered reasonably conformal and homogenous dose to the PTV (CI <1.47, HI <0.53), but not for CARC (p < 0.05). IMSRT presented with the smallest CI (1.37) and HI (0.40). Among the four techniques, IMSRT spared the greatest number of OARs, namely brainstem, temporal lobes, optic chiasm, and optic nerve, and had the smallest normal tissue volume in the low-dose region. CONCLUSION: Based on the dosimetric comparison, IMSRT was optimal for locally recurrent NPC by delivering a conformal and homogenous dose to the PTV while sparing OARs.

A broadly adaptive array of dose-constraint templates for planning of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate adaptive dose-constraint templates in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume histograms of clinically approved plans for 20 patients with advanced T-stage NPC were analyzed, and the pattern of distribution in relation to the degree of overlap between targets and organs at risk (OARs) was explored. An adaptive dose constraint template (ADCT) was developed based on the degree of overlap. Another set of 10 patients with advanced T-stage NPC was selected for validation. Results of the manual arm optimization protocol and the ADCT optimization protocol were compared with respect to dose optimization time, conformity indices, multiple-dose end points, tumor control probability, and normal tissue complication probability. RESULTS: For the ADCT protocol, average time required to achieve an acceptable plan was 9 minutes, with one optimization compared with 94 minutes with more than two optimizations of the manual arm protocol. Target coverage was similar between the manual arm and ADCT plans. A more desirable dose distribution in the region of overlap between planning target volume and OARs was achieved in the ADCT plan. Dose end points of OARs were similar between the manual arm and ADCT plans. CONCLUSIONS: With the developed ADCT, IMRT treatment planning becomes more efficient and less dependent on the planner's experience on dose optimization. The developed ADCT is applicable to a wide range of advanced T-stage NPC treatment and has the potential to be applied in a broader context to IMRT planning for other cancer sites.