Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phlebology ; 23(4): 193-5, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18663120

ABSTRACT

A 75-year-old woman presented with painful recurrent venous ulcers (VU) continuously for the past 33 months on a background of frequent intermittent problems for the last 16 years. She had previously been treated with varicose vein surgery and trials of compression bandaging. Subsequently, she underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) targeting the distal incompetent remnant of her great and small saphenous veins. This resulted in complete healing of her ulcers within four weeks. The dramatic response demonstrated in this case suggests that EVLA may represent an effective intervention in the management of postsurgery refractory VU.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Varicose Ulcer/surgery , Varicose Veins/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Female , Humans , Reoperation , Saphenous Vein/pathology , Secondary Prevention , Stockings, Compression , Treatment Failure , Varicose Ulcer/pathology , Varicose Veins/pathology
2.
Phlebology ; 22(1): 16-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18265549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) surgery are currently subjected to two duplex scans. The first is to confirm the reflux, and the second is done preoperatively to accurately mark the SPJ for surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of hand-held Doppler (HHD) can substitute the second duplex scan. METHODS: Sixty limbs with suspected SPJ reflux were studied. Patients underwent an initial duplex scan. The report detailed the position of SPJ in relation to popliteal crease. Guided by this, a HHD was then used to mark the SPJ. Deviation of the HHD mark from the duplex one of < or =10 mm was considered acceptable for surgical accuracy. RESULTS: HHD accurately localized all 27 patients with SPJ reflux (100% accuracy). The distances between the HHD and duplex points in this group ranged between 0 and 5 mm (median=0). Twenty-five patients had SPJ with no reflux, and 22 of them were accurately localized (88%). The distances between the two points in the latter group ranged between 0 and 16 mm (median=3). CONCLUSION: HHD, guided by the routine duplex scan, can accurately mark SPJ with reflux. A second duplex is not required for marking prior to surgery. This will reduce the workload of the vascular laboratory.


Subject(s)
Popliteal Vein/diagnostic imaging , Saphenous Vein/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex , Ultrasonography, Doppler/standards , Varicose Veins/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Point-of-Care Systems , Popliteal Vein/surgery , Preoperative Care , Reproducibility of Results , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Unnecessary Procedures , Varicose Veins/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...