Alterations of network synchrony after epileptic seizures: An analysis of post-ictal intracranial recordings in pediatric epilepsy patients.

OBJECTIVE: Post-ictal EEG alterations have been identified in studies of intracranial recordings, but the clinical significance of post-ictal EEG activity is undetermined. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between peri-ictal EEG activity, surgical outcome, and extent of seizure propagation in a sample of pediatric epilepsy patients. METHODS: Intracranial EEG recordings were obtained from 19 patients (mean age = 11.4 years, range = 3-20 years) with 57 seizures used for analysis (mean = 3.0 seizures per patient). For each seizure, 3-min segments were extracted from adjacent pre-ictal and post-ictal epochs. To compare physiology of the epileptic network between epochs, we calculated the relative delta power (Δ) using discrete Fourier transformation and constructed functional networks based on broadband connectivity (conn). We investigated differences between the pre-ictal (Δpre, connpre) and post-ictal (Δpost, connpost) segments in focal-network (i.e., confined to seizure onset zone) versus distributed-network (i.e., diffuse ictal propagation) seizures. RESULTS: Distributed-network (DN) seizures exhibited increased post-ictal delta power and global EEG connectivity compared to focal-network (FN) seizures. Following DN seizures, patients with seizure-free outcomes exhibited a 14.7% mean increase in delta power and an 8.3% mean increase in global connectivity compared to pre-ictal baseline, which was dramatically less than values observed among seizure-persistent patients (29.6% and 47.1%, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: Post-ictal differences between DN and FN seizures correlate with post-operative seizure persistence. We hypothesize that post-ictal deactivation of subcortical nuclei recruited during seizure propagation may account for this result while lending insights into mechanisms of post-operative seizure recurrence.

Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: an open-label interventional trial.

BACKGROUND: Almost a third of patients with epilepsy have a treatment-resistant form, which is associated with severe morbidity and increased mortality. Cannabis-based treatments for epilepsy have generated much interest, but scientific data are scarce. We aimed to establish whether addition of cannabidiol to existing anti-epileptic regimens would be safe, tolerated, and efficacious in children and young adults with treatment-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: In this open-label trial, patients (aged 1-30 years) with severe, intractable, childhood-onset, treatment-resistant epilepsy, who were receiving stable doses of antiepileptic drugs before study entry, were enrolled in an expanded-access programme at 11 epilepsy centres across the USA. Patients were given oral cannabidiol at 2-5 mg/kg per day, up-titrated until intolerance or to a maximum dose of 25 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg per day (dependent on study site). The primary objective was to establish the safety and tolerability of cannabidiol and the primary efficacy endpoint was median percentage change in the mean monthly frequency of motor seizures at 12 weeks. The efficacy analysis was by modified intention to treat. Comparisons of the percentage change in frequency of motor seizures were done with a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Between Jan 15, 2014, and Jan 15, 2015, 214 patients were enrolled; 162 (76%) patients who had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after the first dose of cannabidiol were included in the safety and tolerability analysis, and 137 (64%) patients were included in the efficacy analysis. In the safety group, 33 (20%) patients had Dravet syndrome and 31 (19%) patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The remaining patients had intractable epilepsies of different causes and type. Adverse events were reported in 128 (79%) of the 162 patients within the safety group. Adverse events reported in more than 10% of patients were somnolence (n=41 [25%]), decreased appetite (n=31 [19%]), diarrhoea (n=31 [19%]), fatigue (n=21 [13%]), and convulsion (n=18 [11%]). Five (3%) patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Serious adverse events were reported in 48 (30%) patients, including one death-a sudden unexpected death in epilepsy regarded as unrelated to study drug. 20 (12%) patients had severe adverse events possibly related to cannabidiol use, the most common of which was status epilepticus (n=9 [6%]). The median monthly frequency of motor seizures was 30.0 (IQR 11.0-96.0) at baseline and 15.8 (5.6-57.6) over the 12 week treatment period. The median reduction in monthly motor seizures was 36.5% (IQR 0-64.7). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that cannabidiol might reduce seizure frequency and might have an adequate safety profile in children and young adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy. Randomised controlled trials are warranted to characterise the safety profile and true efficacy of this compound. FUNDING: GW Pharmaceuticals, Epilepsy Therapy Project of the Epilepsy Foundation, Finding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures.