Women's opinions on the offer and use of maternal serum screening.

We studied the opinions and experiences concerning maternal serum screening of two groups of women: (A) women who were not eligible for prenatal diagnosis; and (B) women for whom prenatal diagnosis was available because of advanced maternal age, and who either underwent chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Many of the women were in favour of the availability of serum screening and would apply for this test in a future pregnancy. This applied also to many respondents who had previously undergone prenatal diagnosis. Most of these women, however, did not intend to decline diagnostic amniocentesis if the screening results did not indicate an increased risk. The majority of the group of respondents of 36 years and over did not consider it acceptable if age indication was dropped altogether. A system based on serum screening will have other implications than a policy based on age indication, since specific individual risk assessment is perceived as being of more significance than a risk statistically derived from age alone. Serum screening is often seen as a means of reassurance and many women are not aware of the possible drawbacks. As technology becomes increasingly complicated, counselling has to be adjusted correspondingly. Further research is needed to establish whether and how distress can be minimized and well-considered individual choice can be achieved.

[How women cope with the results of maternal serum screening for fetal neural tube defects and Down syndrome]. / Hoe vrouwen omgaan met de uitslag van maternale-serumscreening op foetale neurale-buisdefecten en Down-syndroom.

At the University Hospital of Groningen maternal serum screening for fetal neural tube defects and Down's syndrome is available to pregnant women on their request. We have inquired into the reasons why women apply for serum screening and how this affects them. We did so by means of questionnaires sent to 200 women and by interviewing 20 women whose screening result indicated an increased chance of giving birth to a Down's syndrome child. The response percentage was 52.5. It appeared that opting for serum screening is seen as a self evident choice rather than a conscious one. In general, at the time of the decision, the women only saw the advantages of the test while possible consequences were often not taken into account. More than 70% of the women said they would apply for amniocentesis if they were told that they had an increased risk of having a baby with Down's syndrome. The confrontation with an increased risk of Down's syndrome then came unexpectedly and caused much distress. How to deal with the risk assessment results proved to be very difficult for these women. The difference in scale of the risk factor as established by the screening test compared with the original risk factor based on maternal age was interpreted by them as being of more significance than the statistical implication of the factor itself.