Dissolution Profiles of Generic Products in Dissolution Media Defined by Japanese Guidelines for Bioequivalence Studies.

The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use M9 Guidelines for Biopharmaceutics Classification System Biowaivers reached harmonization in November 2019. However, guidelines for bioequivalence studies are not internationally harmonized, and water as a dissolution medium is only required in Japanese guidelines, regardless of drug solubility. This study investigated the dissolution profiles of generic products in Japan that differ from those of original drugs in dissolution media defined in guidelines. Dissolution profiles disclosed on websites of generic manufacturers were investigated for 262 active ingredients listed in the bluebook (4638 oral solid products listed in the National Health Insurance drug price list) issued by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 5% of all generic products were different from the original products in dissolution media, of which 20% was observed in water only. Among the active pharmaceutical ingredients that showed different dissolution profiles only in water, the ratio of original products that showed slower dissolution profiles to the generics was 73%. The ratio of products showing different dissolution in water only was higher than in other media investigated in this study; however, these do not reflect disintegration and dissolution of drug products in the gastrointestinal tract, since bioequivalence has been confirmed in human studies and the generic products were approved by Japanese authorities. Therefore, a discussion about the required use of water as a dissolution medium in the Japanese guidelines is needed among industry, academia, and regulatory authorities.

Impact of Quality by Design Development on the Review Period of New Drug Approval and Product Quality in Japan.

BACKGROUND: For pharmaceutical products, an in-depth understanding of manufacturing processes and quality risks associated with quality by design (QbD) development enables the production of high-quality products. Product recall due to quality issues could be minimized for QbD-developed products. Furthermore, the review period instituted by regulatory authorities could be shortened by allowing reviewers to access technical documents with QbD elements. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of QbD development from the viewpoints of regulatory flexibility, product quality related to recall, and review period in Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in Japan. METHODS: QbD developments for new active ingredients, approved from 2009 to 2018, were surveyed in the PMDA review reports, and review periods were investigated on the PMDA website. Voluntary product recalls and their rationale were investigated using the website of the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. RESULTS: Although the developmental ratio with QbD elements was increased from 9% in 2009 to 71% in 2018, the development of design space for drug substances and products between 2009 and 2018 was only 2%, and real time release testing (RTRT) for drug products was limited to 3%. Voluntary recall and extension of the review period for QbD-developed products were not observed. CONCLUSION: The advantages of systematic QbD development were suggested for no voluntary recall of QbD-developed products. Conversely, applicants did not actively seek regulatory flexibility with design space or RTRT, and QbD development failed to impact the PMDA review period.