Altered cingulate and amygdala response towards threat and safe cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: Emotional dysregulation is becoming increasingly recognized as an important feature of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In this study, two experiments were conducted investigating the neural response to either verbally instructed fear (IF) or uninstructed (classically conditioned) fear (UF) using the skin conductance response (SCR) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHOD: In the conditioning phase of the UF experiment (17 ADHD and 17 healthy controls), subjects experienced an unconditioned stimulus (UCS, unpleasant electrodermal stimulation) paired with a former neutral conditioned stimulus (CS+), whereas a control stimulus (CS-) was never paired with the UCS. In the subsequent test phase, only the CS+ and the CS- were presented. In the IF experiment (13 ADHD and 17 healthy controls), subjects were only told that an independently experienced UCS might occur together with the CS+ but not the CS- during testing. No UCS was presented. RESULTS: Groups did not detectably differ in SCR or neural responses to UF. In IF, ADHD patients showed a trend-line decreased SCR and significantly decreased activation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), a region prominently involved in fear responding, to the CS+. This was accompanied by higher amygdala activation to the CS-. CONCLUSIONS: During IF, ADHD patients showed deficits in regions centrally involved in fear learning and expression in terms of diminished CS+-related dACC and increased CS--related amygdala signals. This suggests an impaired processing of verbally transmitted aversive information, which is central for conveying fear information in social contexts. This result extends the growing literature on emotional alterations in ADHD.

Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy versus androgen deprivation.

OBJECTIVE(S): To compare the outcome of patients with stage D1 (TxN+M0) prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy or androgen deprivation alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients treated for lymph node positive prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed for time to progression, tumor-specific and overall survival. Furthermore, subsequent tumor and treatment related morbidity requiring intervention including frequency and duration of associated hospital stays was recorded. RESULTS: The extent of lymph node metastasis was significantly lower in 50 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (+/- early androgen deprivation) compared to 32 receiving androgen deprivation only. The treatment groups, however, did not differ with regard to other characteristics including age, comorbidity, stage, grade and preoperative PSA. Mean actuarial progression-free, and tumor-specific survival was significantly longer for the radical prostatectomy patients (36% and 47%, respectively at 10 years) compared to androgen deprivation (15% and 32%, respectively). The latter group required more secondary interventions resulting in more frequent and overall longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for stage D1 prostate cancer possibly benefit with regard to the necessity for secondary interventions and, at least for limited (solitary) nodal disease, in terms of progression-free and tumor-specific survival. However, the latter observation may be biased by a larger extent of lymph node metastasis in the androgen deprivation group.