Association between weight-loss history and weight loss achieved in clinical obesity management: Retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE: Weight history and its association with the weight loss achieved in a publicly funded clinical obesity management program were examined in 9348 patients. METHODS: Weight history (frequency and magnitude of weight losses) was collected through questionnaires at enrollment, and weight change was assessed with retrospective electronic medical chart review. RESULTS: The majority of patients reported developing overweight prior to the age of 40 years and having lost at least 4.5 kg (10 lb) of weight at least once in their lifetime. Those who had an earlier onset of overweight had a higher frequency of past weight loss and had more cumulative weight loss over their lifetime. In women, but not men, earlier age of overweight onset and lifetime weight loss were associated with modestly greater weight loss at the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Women with greater weight-loss history also have modestly greater weight loss at the obesity management clinic. Thus, successful long-term obesity management, particularly for women, may include a series of repeated attempts at weight loss that should not be viewed as failures but could be viewed instead as practice.

Sequential diets and weight loss: Including a low-carbohydrate high-fat diet with and without time-restricted feeding.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of a low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF) diet with and without a time-restricted feeding (TRF) protocol on weight loss and participating in three sequential dietary interventions (standard calorie-deficit diet, LCHF, and LCHF + TRF) on weight loss outcomes. METHODS: Data from 227 adults from the Wharton Medical Clinic (WMC) were analyzed using a unidirectional case crossover design. Data was imputed for 154 patients to create a pseudo-sample in which everyone participated in three dietary interventions: standard calorie restriction, LCHF, and LCHF + TRF. RESULTS: Patients lost an average of 11.1 ± 1.3 kg (9.8 ± 1.1%) after three sequential dietary interventions (P < 0.0001). Patients lost a statistically significant amount of weight from the standard WMC, LCHF, and LCHF+TRF diets (P < 0.05). With and without adjustment for age, sex, body mass index at the start of the dietary protocol, and treatment time, patients lost a similar amount of weight regardless of the dietary intervention (P > 0.05). Approximately 78.6% of patients achieved ≥5% weight loss with at least one of the diets. CONCLUSION: Patients can lose a similar amount of weight regardless of the diet they are following. Approximately 78.9% of patients achieved 5% weight loss with at least one of the diets and lost an average 11.1 kg (or 9.8%). This is nearly double what has been previously reported for one dietary intervention. Thus, participating in sequential diets may be associated with greater absolute weight loss, and likelihood of achieving a clinically significant weight loss.

Extended-release naltrexone/bupropion is safe and effective among subjects with type 2 diabetes already taking incretin agents: a post-hoc analysis of the LIGHT trial.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release naltrexone/bupropion (NB) is indicated for chronic weight management. Incretin agents are recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes. This analysis looked at the add-on of NB to incretins to see if weight loss could occur in patients already stabilized on incretin agents. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of NB vs. placebo (PL) among subjects with type 2 diabetes stable on an incretin agent prior to randomization in a double-blind, PL-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial (N = 1317). RESULTS: Over 1 year, mean weight loss was significantly greater among NB patients vs. PL among those taking DPP-4i (mean absolute difference 4.6% [p < 0.0001]) and those taking GLP-1RAs (mean absolute difference 5.2%, p < 0.0001). Proportions of subjects achieving 5% weight loss were significantly greater for NB vs. PL at weeks 26 and 52 among those taking DPP-4is or GLP-1RAs. There were no significant differences in effectiveness observed between NB + DPP-4i and NB + GLP-1RA or between PL + DPP-4i and PL + GLP-1RA in any of the analyses. Serious adverse events were reported by 9.1% and 11.1% for PL + DPP-4i and PL + GLP-1RA, respectively, and 13.3% and 12.4% of NB + DPP-4i and NB + GLP-1RA, respectively. CONCLUSION: NB appears to be effective in reducing weight in patients with T2DM and obesity/overweight who are taking DPP-4ihibitors or GLP-1RA. The SAE rates in all arms of this analysis were lower than have been reported in other cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes.

An analysis of weight loss efforts and expectations in a Canadian Cohort: A retrospective medical chart review.

The weight loss history and weight loss goals were examined in 4108 patients referred to a publicly funded evidence-based clinical weight management program using a retrospective chart review. The majority of patients were white females, aged of 50.1 ± 13.7 years and a BMI of 39.0 ± 7.5 kg/m2 . Pregnancy was the most common reason for weight gain in women (17.7%) and while the reasons in men are more varied (injury, stress and medication: all ~5%). Over 50% of patients cited no specific reason for their weight gain. Self-directed diet and exercise were the most commonly used self-reported weight loss methods. Women were more likely to report using medication and bariatric surgical weight loss methods than men (P < .05), and only 5% of women and 12.8% men report never having tried to lose weight in the past. Patients had an ideal weight loss goal of 28.9% to 34.4%, which was similar to the patient's lowest reported adult weight. Approximately 70% of patients enrolling at the clinic had previously lost at least 4.5 kg (10 lb) one or more times and 16.7% lost weight at least 5 times in their life, but patient weight at enrolment was similar to their highest adult reported weight. Thus, most patients referred to this clinical weight management program have previously attempted self-directed diet and exercise weight loss. Patients were close to their highest adult weight and had very large weight loss goals, similar to what is typically achieved only by surgical intervention, despite having already had several bouts of weight loss.

Real-world persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management and the SaxendaCare® patient support program.

OBJECTIVE: Weight management medications can significantly increase patients' chances of achieving a clinically meaningful weight loss if patients persist with treatment. This retrospective observational study of de-identified medical records of 311 patients is the first real-world study examining persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg in Canada, and also investigates associations between the SaxendaCare® patient support program and persistence and weight loss. METHODS: Overall persistence was assessed, as well as associations of enrollment in SaxendaCare®, persistence and weight loss. RESULTS: Overall mean (standard deviation) persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg was 6.3 (4.1) months, and 67.5% (n = 210) and 53.7% (n = 167) of patients persisted for ≥4 and ≥ 6 months, respectively. Enrollment in SaxendaCare® was associated with significantly longer persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg and greater weight loss. Patients enrolled in SaxendaCare® (n = 119) persisted for 7.9 (4.0) versus 5.2 (3.8) months for those not enrolled (n = 184) (p < 0.001), and had significantly greater percent weight loss after 6 months regardless of the duration of their persistence (-7.9% vs -5.5% from baseline, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, in clinical settings, persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg can exceed 6 months, and that enrolling in SaxendaCare® may be associated with comparatively longer persistence and, regardless of persistence, greater weight loss.

Weight loss and persistence with liraglutide 3.0 mg by obesity class in the real-world effectiveness study in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Liraglutide 3.0 mg is associated with clinically significant weight loss in clinical trials, but real-world data are lacking. In this analysis, weight loss and persistence outcomes with liraglutide 3.0 mg were assessed across obesity classes, in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: Secondary analysis of an observational, retrospective study of liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management (as adjunct to diet and exercise) at six Wharton Medical Clinics in Canada. Patients were categorized by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) into obesity class I (BMI 30-34.9); class II (BMI 35-39.9); and class III (BMI ≥40). Change in weight, categorical weight loss, time to maintenance dose (defined as the time to reach the full liraglutide 3.0 mg maintenance dose) and persistence were assessed for each class and for differences between classes. RESULTS: Of 308 patients, 70 (22.7%) had obesity class I, 83 (26.9%) obesity class II and 155 (50.3%) obesity class III. Similar percentage change in weight was observed between obesity classes (mean [standard deviation, SD]: -7.0% [6.0], -6.6% [6.0] and -6.1% [5.0], respectively; p = .640), and similar proportions achieved ≥5% weight loss (60.4%, 62.0% and 55.3%, respectively; p = .717) at 6 months. Mean time to maintenance dose (SD) was 64.2 (56.4) d, 76.4 (56.3) d and 71.4 (54.5) d for obesity classes I, II and III, respectively (p = .509). Persistence with medication was also similar between obesity classes (p = .358). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that real-world treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg, regardless of obesity class, is associated with similar clinically significant weight loss, time to maintenance dose and medication persistence.

Liraglutide 3.0 mg for the management of insufficient weight loss or excessive weight regain post-bariatric surgery.

To assess the effectiveness of liraglutide 3.0 mg in post-bariatric surgery patients, and to determine whether this would differ based on the type of bariatric surgery. One hundred seventeen post-bariatric surgery patients from the Wharton Medical Clinic were analysed. Changes in weight while taking liraglutide 3.0 mg were examined for all patients, and by three types of bariatric surgery-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, gastric banding and gastric sleeve. Patients primarily underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 53, 45.3%) or gastric banding (n = 50, 42.7%). Over 7.6 ± 7.1 months taking liraglutide 3.0 mg, patients lost a statistically significant amount of weight (-6.3 ± 7.7 kg, P < .05) regardless of the type of surgery they had (P > .05). This decrease in weight remained significant after 1-year of taking liraglutide 3.0 mg (P < .05). Nausea was the most prevalent side effect, reported by 29.1% patients. While options for excess weight management in post-bariatric surgery patients are limited, results of this study suggest that post-bariatric surgery patients can lose a significant amount of weight while taking liraglutide 3.0 mg regardless of the type of surgery they had. Further, similar to non-surgical populations, post-bariatric surgery patients taking liraglutide 3.0 mg may experience gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and can continue to lose weight up to 1 year.

The effectiveness and safety of pharmaceuticals to manage excess weight post-bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review.

Objective: To systematically review the literature on weight management pharmaceutical use in patients who have had bariatric surgery. Methods: Google Scholar, Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials were searched from inception to December 31st, 2018 inclusive. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion and reported decreases in weight with the use of weight management medications in post-bariatric surgical patients. Five studies examined weight loss outcomes by the type of bariatric surgery procedure, and four of these studies observed less weight loss in patients who had undergone gastric sleeve compared to those who had roux-en-y bypass (n = 3 papers) and adjustable gastric banding (n = 1 paper) with medication use. Four studies compared the effectiveness of medications for weight management and observed slightly greater weight loss with the use of topiramate and phentermine as a monotherapy compared to other weight loss medications. Using a sub-sample of participants, authors observed less weight loss on metformin but not phentermine or topiramate for younger adults. Another post-hoc analysis in the same sample observed greater weight loss for older adults with liraglutide 1.8 mg. Side effects were reported in seven studies and were overall consistent with those previously reported in non-surgical populations. Conclusion: Results of this systematic review suggest pharmacotherapy may be an effective tool as an adjunct to diet and physical activity to support weight loss in post-bariatric surgery patients. However, due to most studies lacking a control or placebo group, more rigorous research is required to determine the efficacy of this intervention.