GnRH triggering may improve euploidy and live birth rate in hyper-responders: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Despite the increasing use of GnRHa to trigger final oocyte maturation in segmented IVF cycles, the effects of trigger modality on chromosomal competence and embryo quality remain controversial. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare euploidy rates and pregnancy outcomes among hyper-responding women using hCG versus GnRHa trigger. METHODS: This retrospective study included 333 hyper-responders, defined as >15 oocytes retrieved, who underwent preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A) in segmented IVF cycles using either GnRHa or urinary hCG trigger. Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome of interest. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and euploidy rate were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: GnRH triggering was associated with improved IR (70.5 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.0475), LBR (51.3 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0170) compared to hCG. A greater number of oocytes were retrieved (21.9 vs 18.4%, p < 0.001) and euploid embryos produced (2.8 vs. 2.1, p = 0.0109) after GnRHa triggering, while higher euploidy rates were only observed among women <35-years-old (62.0 vs. 51.7%, p = 0.0307) using GnRHa trigger. Higher OHSS rates were observed after hCG triggering (10.6 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Hyper-responders who received GnRHa trigger experienced improved pregnancy outcomes and lower rates of OHSS compared to hCG triggering. The higher number of oocytes retrieved and euploid embryos produced may reflect an improved developmental competence using GnRHa triggering due to physiologic induction of both LH and FSH surge or other undefined mechanisms that improve embryo development. However, higher overall euploid rates were only observed among women <35-years-old using the GnRHa trigger. Further prospective studies are required to validate this observation and evaluate the specific influence of different ovulation triggers on gamete developmental competence among hyper-responder women.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in women with endometriosis: a systematic review of risk factors and prospects for early surveillance.

Endometriosis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) share similar pathogenic mechanisms. Hence, this systematic review evaluates the association between endometriosis and lifetime ASCVD risk including co-prevalence with dyslipidaemia, atherosclerosis and non-invasive markers of endothelial dysfunction. The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Register of Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for relevant articles. Two prospective cohort studies demonstrated an increased lifetime ASCVD risk after controlling for demographic and lifestyle confounders in women with endometriosis, as measured by higher incidence of myocardial infarction (relative risk [RR] 1.52), angiography-confirmed angina (RR 1.91), or requiring coronary artery bypass graft surgery (RR 1.35). Among 10 studies that included 407 patients with surgically proven endometriosis and 557 controls, RR of developing hypercholesterolemia and hypertension were 1.25 and 1.14, respectively, while higher serum lipoprotein a and lower paraoxonase 1 levels were found in women with endometriosis that was negatively correlated with stage of disease (r = -0.74, P < 0.0001). Hence, currently available evidence suggests that women with endometriosis are at higher lifetime risk of developing ASCVD than women without endometriosis. However, robust causal evidence is still lacking and future studies are needed to determine whether women with endometriosis represent a high-risk population for lifelong ASCVD risk.

Hippo signaling influences HNF4A and FOXA2 enhancer switching during hepatocyte differentiation.

Cell fate acquisition is heavily influenced by direct interactions between master regulators and tissue-specific enhancers. However, it remains unclear how lineage-specifying transcription factors, which are often expressed in both progenitor and mature cell populations, influence cell differentiation. Using in vivo mouse liver development as a model, we identified thousands of enhancers that are bound by the master regulators HNF4A and FOXA2 in a differentiation-dependent manner, subject to chromatin remodeling, and associated with differentially expressed target genes. Enhancers exclusively occupied in the embryo were found to be responsive to developmentally regulated TEAD2 and coactivator YAP1. Our data suggest that Hippo signaling may affect hepatocyte differentiation by influencing HNF4A and FOXA2 interactions with temporal enhancers. In summary, transcription factor-enhancer interactions are not only tissue specific but also differentiation dependent, which is an important consideration for researchers studying cancer biology or mammalian development and/or using transformed cell lines.