Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

The aim of the current study was to use a Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative benefits and risks of balloon kyphoplasty (BK), percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and non-surgical treatment (NST) for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). The results demonstrate that for pain and functional status, PVP was significantly better than NST, while the three treatments did not significantly differ in other outcomes. INTRODUCTION: BK, PVP, and NST are widely used to treat OVCFs, but preferable treatment is unknown. The aim of the current study was to use a Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative benefits and risks of BK, PVP, and NST for patients with OVCFs. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened. Based on the preplanned eligibility criteria, we screened and included randomized controlled trials that compared BK, PVP, and NST in treating patients with OVCFs. The risk of bias for individual studies was appraised. The data were pooled using a Bayesian network meta-analysis and a traditional direct comparison meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1057 relevant studies, 15 were eligible and included. Compared with NST, PVP significantly reduced pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The comparative efficacy of BK and PVP was similar for pain (mean difference (MD) 0.51, 95% credible interval (CrI) - 0.35 to 1.4), ODI (MD 0.11, 95% CrI - 13 to 13), and RMDQ (MD 1.2, 95% CrI - 2.7 to 5.4). The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Physical Component Summary subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36 PCS) did not differ significantly. There were also no substantial differences in the risks of subsequent vertebral fractures, adjacent vertebral fractures, and re-fractures at the treated level across all comparators. The results of pairwise meta-analyses were almost consistent with those of network meta-analyses. The treatment ranking indicated that PVP had the highest probability of being the most effective for pain, ODI, RMDQ, and EQ-5D. BK had the highest probability of improving SF-36 PCS and of reducing the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures and re-fractures at the treated level. NST was ranked first in preventing adjacent vertebral fractures. CONCLUSION: PVP was the most effective method for improving pain, functional status, and quality of life (based on EQ-5D). BK emerged as the best intervention for decreasing the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures and re-fractures at the treated level. NST could be ranked first in reducing adjacent vertebral fractures. The future directions of OVCFs treatment will depend on the outcomes of additional and larger randomized trials in comparing BK with PVP.

[Mid- to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty for symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis].

Objective: To compare the benefits and harms of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF) for symptomatic cervical disc disease at mid- to long-term follow-up. Methods: Electronic searches were made in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials with at least 48 moths follow-up.Outcomes were reported as relative risk or standardized mean difference.Meta-analysis was carried out using Revman version 5.3 and Stata version 12.0. Results: Seven trials were included, involving 2 302 participants.The results of this meta-analysis indicated that CDA brought about fewer secondary surgical procedures, lower neck disability index (NDI) scores, lower neck and arm pain scores, greater SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary(MCS) scores, greater range of motion (ROM) at the operative level and less superior adjacent-segment degeneration(P<0.05) than ACDF.CDA was not statistically different from ACDF in inferior adjacent-segment degeneration, neurological success, and adverse events (P>0.05). Conclusions: CDA can significantly reduce the rates of secondary surgical procedures compared with ACDF.Meanwhile, CDA is superior or equivalent to ACDF in other aspects.As some studies without double-blind are included and some potential biases exites, more randomized controlled trials with high quality are required to get more reliable conclusions.

Traumatic spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China: a single-center report of 354 cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Hospital-based retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiological profile of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China, from 2009 to 2014. SETTING: Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. METHODS: Hospital medical records of patients with TSCI admitted to hospital from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2014 were reviewed. Collected variables included gender, age, marital status, ethnic group, occupation, etiology, neurological level of injury, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA)-ISCoS impairment scale at admission, the severity, death and its cause, concomitant injuries and treatment choice. RESULTS: During the study period, 354 cases were identified. Male-to-female ratio was 2.34:1, with a mean age of 50.1±15.5 years. Falls (55.1%), comprising low falls and high falls (33.6% and 21.5%, respectively), were the leading cause, followed by motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) (35.9%). The most common injury site was the cervical spinal cord, especially C4-C6, accounting for 59.3%. Surgery was the major treatment choice (57.6%). CONCLUSION: The number of TSCI patients increased annually in our center. The mean age at the time of injury was older, and the proportion of males was higher. The leading two causes were falls and MVCs. The SCIs caused by MVCs were increasing. Peasants, workers and unemployed individuals were those at higher risk. Surgery was the major treatment choice. These data may be useful to implement those preventive strategies focused on the characteristics of different groups and pay more attention to high-risk populations.

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities for suspected scaphoid fractures: meta-analysis combined with latent class analysis.

Follow-up radiographs are usually used as the reference standard for the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. However, these are prone to errors in interpretation. We performed a meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies on the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures, in which agreement data between any of follow-up radiographs, bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or CT could be obtained, and combined this with latent class analysis to infer the accuracy of these tests on the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures in the absence of an established standard. The estimated sensitivity and specificity were respectively 91.1% and 99.8% for follow-up radiographs, 97.8% and 93.5% for bone scintigraphy, 97.7% and 99.8% for MRI, and 85.2% and 99.5% for CT. The results were generally robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. There was large between-study heterogeneity for the sensitivity of follow-up radiographs and CT, and imprecision about their sensitivity estimates. If we acknowledge the lack of a reference standard for diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures, MRI is the most accurate test; follow-up radiographs and CT may be less sensitive, and bone scintigraphy less specific.

A comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials.

A randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial was performed to compare traditional digital blocks with single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger. A search for randomised controlled trials of digital blocks through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and CBM was conducted and a meta-analysis including the current trial was performed. The current trial showed no difference between traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection bocks at the base of the finger in respect of injection pain and time to anaesthesia. The meta-analysis suggests that traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks are similar with regard to injection pain and are less painful than the transthecal digital block. The palmar techniques, including single subcutaneous palmar block and transthecal block, carry a risk of not anaesthetising the dorsum of the digit adequately, particularly the dorsum of the thumb and the proximal phalanx of the fingers.

[Evaluation of the function of the hematoencephalic barrier in victims with craniocerebral trauma in critical state]. / Otsenka funktsii gematoéntsefalicheskogo bar'era pri kriticheskikh sostoianiiakh u postradavshikh s cherepno-mozgovoi travmoi.

Estimates of the relative-entry coefficient, molecular profile of the cerebrospinal fluid and of the molecular blood profile based on the comparison of concentrations of proteins with different physical-and-chemical properties enable an evaluation of the function of the hematoencephalic barrier in victims with craniocerebral trauma in critical state. It was possible to state, with such approach in use, that the regulatory and protective functions of the hematoencephalic barrier were changing differently in favorable and unfavorable trauma outcomes, which must be duly considered in choosing a treatment tactics for the above category of victims.

[Repair of multiple fingers degloving injury with abdominal "s"-type skin flap].

OBJECTIVE: To explore a new surgical management of multiple fingers degloving injury. METHODS: In 1994 to 1997, 47 cases with multiple fingers degloving injury were sutured by two reverse "s"-type skin flaps on abdominal flank. RESULTS: The skin flaps in 46 cases survived and the wounds obtained primary heal. CONCLUSION: The application of abdominal flank "s"-type skin flap is reliable and convenient in the treatment of multiple fingers degloving injury.