Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 7238960, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28856161

ABSTRACT

The authors aim to investigate protective effects of fasciotomy against ischemia reperfusion injury of skeletal muscle in rabbit and to compare the treatment effects of prereperfusion + fasciotomy and fasciotomy + postreperfusion against ischemia reperfusion injury of skeletal muscle. 24 healthy male Japanese white rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups, and 4 hours' ischemia was established in these rabbits through surgery. Six hours' reperfusion was performed in group A; reperfusion + postfasciotomy was performed in group B; and prefasciotomy + reperfusion was performed in group C. Result showed that prefasciotomy and postfasciotomy could protect skeletal muscle against ischemia reperfusion injury, reduced MDA (malondialdehyde) expression, MPO (myeloperoxidase) expression, and apoptosis of muscle in the reperfused areas, increased Bcl-2 expression, and decreased Bax expression. The MDA and MPO levels in group B and group C were significantly lower than those in group A, and MDA and MPO levels in group C were significantly lower than those in group B. Prefasciotomy and postfasciotomy could protect against ischemia reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle. The protective effects of prefasciotomy against ischemia reperfusion injury are better than postfasciotomy.


Subject(s)
Fasciotomy/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/surgery , Reperfusion Injury/surgery , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Malondialdehyde/metabolism , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Rabbits , Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology
2.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0173634, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28333947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are three main surgical techniques to treat humeral shaft fractures: open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF), intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, and minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). We performed a network meta-analysis to compare three surgical procedures, including ORPF, IMN fixation, and MIPO, to provide the optimum treatment for humerus shaft fractures. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, and Cochrane library were researched for reports published up to May 2016. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more of the three surgical procedures, including the ORPF, IMN, and MIPO techniques, for humeral shaft fractures in adults. The methodological quality was evaluated based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used WinBUGS1.4 to conduct this Bayesian network meta-analysis. We used the odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to calculate the dichotomous outcomes and analyzed the percentages of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS: Seventeen eligible publications reporting 16 RCTs were included in this study. Eight hundred and thirty-two participants were randomized to receive one of three surgical procedures. The results showed that shoulder impingement occurred more commonly in the IMN group than with either ORPF (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.37) or MIPO fixation (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-0.69). Iatrogenic radial nerve injury occurred more commonly in the ORPF group than in the MIPO group (OR, 11.09; 95% CI, 1.80-124.20). There were no significant differences among the three procedures in nonunion, delayed union, and infection. CONCLUSION: Compared with IMN and ORPF, MIPO technique is the preferred treatment method for humeral shaft fractures.


Subject(s)
Humeral Fractures/surgery , Adult , Bone Plates , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Humans , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Sci Rep ; 7: 39871, 2017 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28054658

ABSTRACT

Several meta-analyses comparing early functional rehabilitation and traditional immobilization following surgical Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture have been published. However, they have led to conflicting conclusions. The aims of this systematic review were to select high-quality meta-analyses from multiple discordant meta-analyses and to provide a postoperative rehabilitation strategy following surgical repair using currently available evidence. We performed a comprehensive search using the PubMed and Embase databases and the Cochrane Library. Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument was used to assess the methodological quality. Three investigators independently applied the Jadad decision algorithm. Their results were then compared to ensure selection of a meta-analysis that provided the highest quality of evidence. Six meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. AMSTAR scores ranged from 6 to 10. According to the Jadad decision algorithm, a high-quality meta-analysis with a greater number of RCTs was selected. This meta-analysis showed that early functional rehabilitation was superior to cast immobilization in terms of patient satisfaction and the time to return to pre-morbid sporting levels. There were no differences regarding major complications or the time before return to prior employment and sporting activity. Thus, we recommend early functional rehabilitation as the postoperative strategy for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.


Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Rupture , Humans , Achilles Tendon/injuries , Early Ambulation/adverse effects , Early Ambulation/methods , Recovery of Function , Restraint, Physical/adverse effects , Rupture/rehabilitation , Rupture/surgery
4.
Eur Neurol ; 77(1-2): 105-112, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27997913

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of eligible studies to compare the surgical outcomes between diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients who have undergone cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (up to February 10, 2016) was conducted. Eligible studies were case-control or cohort studies that compared the outcomes of cervical surgery between diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients. Weighted mean differences, risk ratios, and 95% CIs were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q chi-square test and I2 statistic. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 38,680 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled estimates showed that diabetic patients had significantly lower Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score change between pre- and post operation, and recovery rate than patients without diabetes. Moreover, diabetic patients had significantly increased risk of operative wound, epidural/wound hematoma, chronic lung disease, and cardiac complication. Other postoperative complications, including cerebrospinal fluid leakage and C5 radiculopathy, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus decreased the JOA score change and recovery rate, as well as increased the risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing CSM. Controlling diabetes mellitus before cervical spine surgery may lead to better outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Spinal Cord Diseases/surgery , Spondylosis/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae , Cohort Studies , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Cord Diseases/complications , Spondylosis/complications , Treatment Outcome
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(11): e3059, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26986129

ABSTRACT

The fifth metacarpal neck fractures (commonly termed boxer's fractures) are the most common type of metacarpal fractures. Many types of treatments are available in clinical practice, some of which have already been compared with other treatments by various researchers. However, a comprehensive treatment comparison is lacking. We estimated the comparative efficacy of different interventions for total complications, through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We conducted a systematic search of the literature through October 2015. The outcome measurements were the total complications. We used a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence and to estimate the relative effects of treatment. We identified 6 RCTs registering a total of 288 patients who were eligible for our network meta-analysis. The literature's quality is relatively high. The median Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study score for the included trials was 33.8. The overall methodological quality was high. Of the 6 studies, all were 2-arm controlled trials comparing active intervention. Among the 4 treatments--conservative treatment (CT), antegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN), transverse pinning (TP) with K-wires, and plate fixation (PF)--CT had the best rankings (ie, lowest risk of total complications), followed by PF, AIMN, and TP (ie, highest risk of total complications). Furthermore, we also presented the results using surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve probabilities were 94.1%, 52.9%, 37.3%, and 15.7% for CT, PF, AIMN, and TP, respectively. In conclusion, current evidence suggested that conservative treatment is the optimum treatment for the fifth metacarpal neck fractures because of reduced total complication rates. Moreover, the TP with K-wires is the worst option with highly total complication rates. PF and AIMN therapy should be considered as the first-line choices. Larger and higher-quality randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these conclusions and better inform clinical decision-making.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/therapy , Hand Injuries/therapy , Metacarpal Bones/injuries , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 10: 108, 2015 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26169601

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dorsally displaced distal radius fractures (DDDRF) are frequent injuries in clinical practice. Traditional percutaneous Kirschner wires (K-wire) and open reduction with volar locking plate (VLP) are the two most common surgical fixation techniques used to manage DDDRF. However, there is no current consensual evidence to guide the selection of one technique over the other. Therefore, we undertook a systematic search and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes and complications of these two treatment approaches for DDDRF. METHODS: The following electronic databases were searched by two independent reviewers, up to April 2015: PubMed, ScienceDirect and Wiley Online Library. High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VLP and percutaneous K-wire fixation for DDDRF were identified. Pooled mean differences were calculated for the following continuous outcome variables: disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, grip strength and wrist range of motion. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for rates of total postoperative complications, including superficial infection, deep infection, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), neurological injury, tendon rupture, tenosynovitis, loss of reduction and additional surgery to remove hardware. The meta-analysis was completed using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Seven RCTs, with a total of 875 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with VLP fixation provided statistically lower DASH scores, reduced the incidence of total postoperative complications and specifically lowered the rate of superficial infection, when compared, over a 1-year follow-up, to percutaneous K-wire fixation. VLP fixation also provided significantly better grip strength and range of wrist flexion and supination in the early 6-month postoperative period, compared with percutaneous K-wire fixation. CONCLUSION: ORIF with VLP fixation provided lower DASH scores and reduced total postoperative complications, most specifically lowering the risk for postoperative superficial infection compared to K-wire fixation over a 1-year follow-up period. However, superficial pin track infections do not cause clinical debility in the vast majority of cases. Thus, the claim of reduced superficial infection rate may not be clinically important. The only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn is that at present, there is insufficient data even on our meta-analysis to help the clinician make an informed choice.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Bone Wires , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Radius Fractures/surgery , Bone Plates/trends , Bone Wires/trends , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Internal/trends , Humans , Radius Fractures/diagnosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Treatment Outcome
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(11): e599, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25789949

ABSTRACT

Multiple meta-analyses have been published to compare intramedullary nail and plate for treating humeral shaft fractures; however, results are discordant.The purposes of current study were to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing intramedullary nail and plate fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures, to appraise the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of meta-analyses, and to propose a guide through the currently discordant available evidence.This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. The literature was systematically reviewed to identify meta-analyses comparing intramedullary nail and plate fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Only meta-analyses exclusively including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) met eligibility criteria in this systematic review. Methodological quality for each included study was assessed using the Oxford Levels of Evidence and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews Instrument. We extracted all variables from the included studies and listed the results reported by them. Heterogeneity information of each variable was extracted for the included studies. An I of <60% is accepted in this systematic review. The Jadad algorithm was then applied to determine which meta-analyses provided the best evidence.Seven studies met the inclusion criteria in this study. All studies included RCTs or quasi-RCT and were Level II of evidence. Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scores varied from 6 to 10 with a median of 7.86. Heterogeneity of each outcome was acceptable in those meta-analyses pooled results. The Jadad algorithm suggested that the meta-analyses can be selected based on the search strategies and application of selection. As a result, 2 meta-analyses with more RCTs were selected in this systematic review. The best available evidence suggested that the differences between intramedullary nail and plate fixation were not significant in fracture union, radial nerve injury, and infection. But intramedullary nail significantly increased the risk of shoulder complications (shoulder impingement and restriction of shoulder movement) and reoperation.We concluded that plate fixation is superior to intramedullary nail for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Algorithms , Bone Nails , Bone Plates , Humans
8.
J Hand Surg Am ; 39(11): 2192-202, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25227600

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the overall success rate and potential influencing factors within the current evidence for percutaneous first annular pulley release. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all clinical studies of percutaneous release. The rates of successful procedure and complication were extracted and analyzed. We charted the overall success rate on a forest plot with 95% confidence intervals. Data of success rates were analyzed in 5- and 10-year intervals to determine whether the rate of success had increased chronologically. We then performed 3 subgroup analyses according to instrument type (needles vs knife blades), cortisone use (cortisone vs noncortisone), and sonography guidance (sonography vs non-sonography guidance). Pooled success rates were calculated in the subgroups and compared using chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies involving 2,114 percutaneous procedures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The total success rate was 94%. There was a trend toward increasing number of publications in the past 20 years. We found a statistically significant trend showing that overall success rates had increased over time. Chi-square test revealed that percutaneous release with sonography guidance had a significantly higher success rate than non-sonography guidance. There were no significant differences in other subgroup analyses including instrument type and cortisone use. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous release is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of trigger digit. It has become progressively popular in recent years, with a trend toward increased overall success. Sonography might be a helpful tool for maximizing success. The success rates were not affected by instruments and cortisone use. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.


Subject(s)
Trigger Finger Disorder/surgery , Humans , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional
9.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 468(3): 723-34, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19756904

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Imaging protocols for suspected scaphoid fractures among investigators and hospitals are markedly inconsistent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of bone scintigraphy, MRI, and CT for diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures. Twenty-six studies were included. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were pooled separately and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were fitted for each modality. Meta-regression analyses were performed to compare these modalities. We obtained likelihood ratios derived from the pooled sensitivity and specificity and, using Bayes' theorem, calculated the posttest probability by application of the tests. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, natural logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were, respectively, 97%, 89%, 4.78, 8.82, and 0.03 for bone scintigraphy; 96%, 99%, 6.60, 96, and 0.04 for MRI; and 93%, 99%, 6.11, 93, and 0.07 for CT. Bone scintigraphy and MRI have equally high sensitivity and high diagnostic value for excluding scaphoid fracture; however, MRI is more specific and better for confirming scaphoid fracture. We believe additional studies are needed to assess diagnostic performance of CT, especially paired design studies or randomized controlled trials to compare CT with MRI or bone scintigraphy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Scaphoid Bone/injuries , Databases, Bibliographic , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Radionuclide Imaging , Scaphoid Bone/diagnostic imaging , Scaphoid Bone/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging
10.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 460: 142-51, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17310931

ABSTRACT

Whether operative treatment is a better option than nonoperative treatment for acute nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures of the scaphoid is controversial. The type of cast that should be used for nonoperative treatment is not known. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasirandomized trials to evaluate the effect of operative versus nonoperative treatment and the effect of different casting methods for nonoperative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures on nonunion rate, return to work, grip strength, range of wrist motion, complications, patient evaluation, and incidence of osteoarthritis. Two investigators assessed trial quality and extracted data. Operative treatment of acute nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures of the scaphoid waist does not provide greater benefits regarding nonunion rate, return to work, grip strength, range of wrist motion, or patient satisfaction than cast immobilization; however, it causes more complications and, perhaps, a higher risk of scaphotrapezial osteoarthritis. There is no evidence from randomized trials to determine whether operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment for an acute proximal pole fracture of scaphoid bones. There is insufficient evidence to determine which type of cast should be used in nonoperative treatment of nondisplaced scaphoid fractures.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/therapy , Scaphoid Bone/injuries , Acute Disease , Casts, Surgical , Hand Strength , Humans , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Range of Motion, Articular
11.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15921317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning (IP) duration against ischemic reperfusion injury of skeletal muscle. METHODS: Thirty-six Wistar rats were made amputation-like models, which underwent temporary amputation at the level of the femur, excluding the femoral vessels. They were divided into 6 groups (n=6) according to different treatments before ischemia-reperfusion: group A (4 hours of ischemia-reperfusion); groups B, C, D, E (5, 10, 15, 20 minutes of ischemia and 5, 10, 15, 20 minutes of reperfusion respectively, for 3 cycles, 4 hours ischemia-reperfusion); group F (no ischemia-reperfusion). The malondialdehyde (MDA), the extent of edema and necrosis of skeletal muscle were measured to observe protective effects of different ischemic preconditioning duration. RESULTS: Five minutes of ischemic preconditioning (IP5) could protect skeletal muscle of ischaemia against necrosis and the survival area of the muscle was 82.47%. The effects of IP10 and IP15 were significantly superior to that of IP5 and the survival areas of the muscle were 89.03% and 89.49%. The effect of IP20 (78.27%) was significantly inferior to that of IP5. IP5 could reduce edema of skeletal muscle, the effect of IP10 was significantly superior to that of IP5. IP5, IP10, and IP15 could decrease the level of MDA, but IP20 did not decrease it. CONCLUSION: The trend of protective effect of IP on ischemia-reperfusion injury of the muscle in rats first rise to the peak and then go down, 10 minutes of IP is optimal.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Preconditioning , Muscle, Skeletal/blood supply , Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Time Factors
12.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12920730

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report the effect of Russe technique in treating old scaphoid fracture. METHODS: From January 1987 to February 1999, 11 cases of old scaphoid fractures were treated with Russe technique. The follow-up period averaged 5 years and 7 months. RESULTS: The fracture healing rate was 100%, and wrist pain was completely relieved in all cases. The ranges of motion averaged 41.2 degrees of flexion, 40.5 degrees of extension, 8.7 degrees of radial deviation, and 15.4 degrees of ulnar deviation. The grip strength reached 82.9% of the normal side. CONCLUSION: Russe technique is an effective and safe method of treatment for old scaphoid fracture.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation/methods , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Scaphoid Bone/injuries , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Ununited/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Recovery of Function , Wrist Injuries/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...