Task-dependent compensation after pyramidal tract and dorsolateral spinal lesions in rats.

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether pathways in the dorsal part of the lateral spinal funiculus (DLF) can compensate for loss of corticospinal input (CST) to the spinal cord. The CST is known to control skilled limb movements in rats. The DLF contains several different pathways, including the rubrospinal tract (RST) which is also thought to influence limb movements. After lesions of either the corticospinal or the rubrospinal system, it is unclear how much of the remaining forelimb function is due to the presence of the alternate pathway. To begin to address this issue, the present study investigates the compensatory role of pathways in the DLF, including the rubrospinal tract, after bilateral lesions of the pyramidal tract (PT). We initially performed bilateral PT lesions in rats, which effectively removed the CST input to the spinal cord. We tested these rats during overground locomotion, skilled locomotion and skilled forelimb usage. After a 6 week recovery period, we then performed bilateral DLF lesions and compared the behavioural abilities of these rats to those of animals which underwent simultaneous PT and DLF lesions. If DLF pathways do compensate for PT lesions, then animals with PT lesions would rely more on DLF pathways than animals without PT lesions. Thus we hypothesized that animals with DLF lesions which were performed 6 weeks after PT lesions would exhibit more deficits on several behavioural tasks compared to animals which received PT and DLF lesions simultaneously. Our hypothesis was supported only for skilled pellet retrieval. Hence some DLF pathways, including the RST, were able to compensate for loss of CST input during skilled reaching but not during overground or skilled locomotion in PT-lesioned rats. These differential responses suggest that behavioural tasks vary in their reliance on specific pathways after injury, and, furthermore, that compensation for loss of specific connections can arise from numerous sources.

Effects of combined dorsolateral and dorsal funicular lesions on sensorimotor behaviour in rats.

The purpose of this research was to investigate the compensatory role of undamaged spinal pathways after partial spinal injury in rats. We have previously shown that bilateral lesions of the dorsal funiculus (DF) at the cervical level caused changes in overground and skilled locomotion that affected the forelimbs more than the hindlimbs. The same lesions also caused fore-paw deficits during a skilled pellet retrieval task (Kanagal and Muir, 2007). In contrast, bilateral cervical lesions of the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) caused alterations in overground and skilled locomotion that were most marked in the hindlimbs rather than the forelimbs, but also caused fore-paw deficits during skilled pellet retrieval (Muir et al., 2007). We hypothesized that the relative lack of forelimb deficits during locomotion after DLF lesions was due to compensatory input arising from intact pathways in the DF. We tested this hypothesis in the present study by performing bilateral DF lesions in animals in which both DLFs had been transected 6 weeks previously. These secondary DF lesions involved either only ascending sensory pathways (DLF+ASP group) in the DF, i.e. sparing the corticospinal tract (CST), or involved both the ASP and the CST (DLF+DF group). All animals were assessed during overground locomotion, while crossing a horizontal ladder and during a pellet retrieval task. During overground locomotion, both groups moved with slightly altered forces and timing in both forelimbs and hindlimbs. During both ladder crossing and reaching, secondary lesions to DF (with or without CST) exacerbated the deficits seen after initial DLF lesions and additionally caused changes in the manner in which the rats used their forelimbs during reaching. Nevertheless, the relative magnitude of the deficits indicates that DF pathways in rats likely do not compensate for loss of DLF pathways during the execution of locomotor tasks, though there is indirect evidence that DLF-lesioned rats might rely more on ascending sensory pathways in the DF during skilled forelimb movements. The plastic changes mediating recovery are therefore necessarily occurring in other regions of the CNS, and, importantly, need time to develop, because animals with DLF+DF lesions performed simultaneously displayed marked functional deficits and were unable to use their forelimbs for skilled locomotion or reaching.

The differential effects of cervical and thoracic dorsal funiculus lesions in rats.

The purpose of this research was to compare the locomotor abilities of rats with cervical dorsal spinal funicular (DF) lesions to those of rats with the same lesion at the mid-thoracic level. The dorsal funiculus, consisting of ascending sensory fibers and the main component of the corticospinal tract, was transected either at spinal level C2 or at T8. We examined limb force generation and limb timing and coordination during overground locomotion, as well as foot placement errors during locomotion over a horizontal ladder. At 6 weeks post-surgery, bilateral lesions of the cervical DF caused subtle but persistent changes in the generation of ground reaction forces and limb timing during overground locomotion, and caused persistent forelimb, but not hindlimb, errors during ladder crossing. In contrast, the same lesion at the mid-thoracic level did not affect overground locomotion and caused only minor forelimb and hindlimb errors during ladder walking at 2 weeks post-lesion which recovered to pre-surgical levels by 6 weeks post-lesion. DF lesions at cervical vs. thoracic levels thus have differential effects on locomotor abilities in rats. We compare these results with previous work and suggest that the differential response to DF transection might be related to both functional distinctions between the fore- and hindlimbs and to anatomical differences in the dorsal funiculi at different spinal levels. These findings have implications for the mechanisms of recovery as well as the types of behavioural tests which can be practically used to measure functional changes in different lesion models.

Bilateral dorsal funicular lesions alter sensorimotor behaviour in rats.

Spinal cord injury models often involve damage to the corticospinal tract (CST) because of the functional importance of this pathway in humans. In rats, the main component of the CST travels in the dorsal funiculus and cannot be damaged without concurrent damage to overlying sensory fibers. To distinguish deficits due to the loss of CST from those due to sensory fiber damage, we bilaterally axotomized ascending sensory fibers in dorsal columns without CST damage in one group of rats (ascending sensory pathways, ASP) and compared the results to a group with damage to ascending sensory fibers with CST damage (ASP+CST). We assessed the ability of rats to perform a skilled reaching task and to walk over a horizontal ladder. We also measured the forces exerted on the ground (ground reaction forces, GRF) and limb contact patterns produced during overground locomotion. After ASP lesions alone, endpoint measurements of reaching success and footslip errors on the ladder showed transitory impairments, although detailed analysis revealed persistent deficits in skilled forelimb movements. ASP+CST lesions caused persistent deficits in reaching success and ladder footslips throughout the 8-week post-surgical period. Measurement of GRFs and limb timing during overground locomotion revealed differences in both groups at 8 weeks post-surgery compared to pre-surgical values, but no differences between ASP and ASP+CST groups. These results emphasize the normal contribution of both ascending sensory axons and CST axons during skilled limb movements and support a role for ascending sensory information, but not descending CST input, during overground locomotion. These results also illustrate the value of using sensitive methods to reveal detailed behavioural changes after spinal injury.