Objective Response by mRECIST Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib in the SILIUS Trial.

OBJECTIVE: In SILIUS (NCT01214343), combination of sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with sorafenib alone. In this study, we explored the relationship between objective response by mRECIST and OS in the sorafenib group, in the combination group, and in all patients in the SILIUS trial. METHODS: Association between objective response and OS in patients treated with sorafenib (n = 103) or combination (n = 102) and all patients (n = 205) were analyzed. The median OS of responders was compared with that of non-responders. Landmark analyses were performed according to objective response at several fixed time points, as sensitivity analyses, and the effect on OS was evaluated by Cox regression analysis with objective response as a time-dependent covariate, with other prognostic factors. RESULTS: In the sorafenib group, OS of responders (n = 18) was significantly better than that of non-responders (n = 78) (p < 0.0001), where median OS was 27.2 (95% CI, 16.0-not reached) months for responders and 8.9 (95% CI, 6.5-12.6) months for non-responders. HRs from landmark analyses at 4, 6, and 8 months were 0.45 (p = 0.0330), 0.37 (p = 0.0053), and 0.36 (p = 0.0083), respectively. Objective response was an independent predictor of OS based on unstratified Cox regression analyses. In the all patients and the combination group, similar results were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: In the SILIUS trial, objective response by sorafenib assessed by mRECIST is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with HCC.

Sorafenib plus low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SILIUS): a randomised, open label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus sorafenib in phase 2 trials has shown favourable tumour control and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, no randomised phase 3 trial has tested the combination of sorafenib with continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy. We aimed to compare continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus sorafenib with sorafenib alone in patients with advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (SILIUS) at 31 sites in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older, with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not suitable for resection, local ablation, or transarterial chemoembolisation; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1; Child-Pugh score 7 or lower; and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system with a computer-generated sequence to receive 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily or 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and fluorouracil 330 mg/m2 continuously on days 1-5 and 8-12 of every 28-day cycle via an implanted catheter system). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The primary efficacy analysis comprised all randomised patients (the intention-to-treat population), and the safety analysis comprised all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01214343. FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2010, and June 10, 2014, 206 patients were randomly assigned (103 to the sorafenib group, 103 to the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy group). One patient in the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy group withdrew after randomisation. Median overall survival was similar in the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (n=102) and sorafenib monotherapy (n=103) groups (11·8 months [95% CI 9·1-14·5] vs 11·5 months [8·2-14·8]; hazard ratio 1·009 [95% CI 0·743-1·371]; p=0·955). Grade 3-4 adverse events that were more frequent in the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy group than in the sorafenib monotherapy group included anaemia (15 [17%] of 88 vs six [6%] of 102), neutropenia (15 [17%] vs one [1%]), thrombocytopenia (30 [34%] vs 12 [12%]), and anorexia (12 [14%] vs six [6%]). INTERPRETATION: Addition of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy to sorafenib did not significantly improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. FUNDING: Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of S-1 monotherapy versus S-1 and interferon-α combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases.

AIM: No effective therapies for extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have yet been identified. Previous studies suggested a potentially promising antitumor effect of combination therapy of S-1, a novel oral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, and interferon (IFN)-α. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of single agent S-1 and S-1/IFN-α for HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases in a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with HCC with extrahepatic metastases were randomly assigned to the S-1/IFN-α group, receiving the combination of S-1 and IFN-α, or the S-1 group, receiving the single agent of S-1. Clinical efficacy and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients in the S-1/IFN-α group and 51 patients in the S-1 group were included in the efficacy analysis. The response rate was 22.4% (11/49) in the S-1/IFN-α group and 13.7% (7/51) in the S-1 group; there was no significant difference. Overall and progression-free survival in the two groups were also not significantly different (1-year overall survival 50.8% vs. 72.4%, median progression-free survival 127 days vs. 157 days). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events in the S-1/IFN-α group was 62.7% (32/51), which tended to be higher than in the S-1 group (43.1% [22/51]). CONCLUSIONS: Oncological outcomes in both treatment groups were favorable compared with previous reports, though there was no significant beneficial effect of adding IFN-α to S-1 for the treatment of HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of prophylactic dexamethasone for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated dexamethasone efficacy at preventing fever, anorexia, and nausea/vomiting, the most frequent adverse events of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Child-Pugh class A/B patients with HCC and no macrovascular invasion/extrahepatic metastases were randomly assigned to either a dexamethasone regimen (day 1, intravenous dexamethasone [20 mg] and granisetron [3 mg] before TACE; days 2 and 3, intravenous dexamethasone [8 mg]) or a control regimen (day 1, intravenous placebo [saline] and granisetron [3 mg]; days 2 and 3, intravenous placebo). The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as the absence of grade ≥1 fever, anorexia, or nausea/vomiting according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) and no use of rescue therapy for 120 hours after TACE. A total of 120 patients between October 2010 and June 2013 were randomly assigned to treatment groups. Overall the complete response rate was greater with the dexamethasone regimen than with the control regimen (47.5%, 95% confidence interval 34.3%-60.9%, versus 10.2%, 95% confidence interval 3.8%-20.8%; P < 0.001). Cumulative incidences of fever, anorexia, and nausea/vomiting were higher in the control regimen group compared with the dexamethasone group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.095, respectively). The dexamethasone regimen was generally well tolerated by HCC patients including those with well-controlled diabetes mellitus and those with hepatitis B virus infection. Conclusion: The dexamethasone regimen was more effective than the control regimen at preventing TACE-induced fever, anorexia, and nausea/vomiting in patients with HCC. (Hepatology 2018;67:575-585).

Prognostic Significance of Concurrent Hypovascular and Hypervascular Nodules in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hypovascular nodules often occur together with hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it remains controversial whether hypovascular nodules associated with hypervascular HCC have any prognostic value. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of hypovascular nodules co-existing with hypervascular HCC as diagnosed by computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) and computed tomography during hepatic arteriography (CTHA), which can sensitively capture the dynamic changes in blood flow through the portal vein and hepatic artery in patients with early stage HCC. METHODS: A total of 152 patients with hypervascular HCC (≤ 30 mm, ≤ 3 nodules), who underwent initial local ablation, were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received CTAP and CTHA prior to treatment. Overall survival (OS) was compared among group A (hypervascular HCC only, 107 patients) and group B (hypovascular nodules and hypervascular HCC, 45 patients). RESULTS: Among all hypovascular nodules, 81% (46 of 57) developed hypervascularization within the follow-up period. The 1- and 2-year hypervascularization rates were 17% and 51%, respectively. OS was significantly longer for group A than for group B (P < 0.001). A Cox proportional-hazards model identified the presence of hypovascular nodules concurrent with hypervascular HCC as an independent poor prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of hypervascular HCC patients with hypovascular nodules detected during CTAP and CTHA is poor. Clinical HCC categories seem to be dissimilar between patients with and without hypovascular nodules.

Post-progression survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to sorafenib.

BACKGROUND: Since the approval of sorafenib, no other agent has been proven to show survival benefits in clinical trials involving patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resistant to sorafenib. Prognostic factors for survival after tumor progression in sorafenib-treated patients are critical for designing second-line trials. METHODS: To determine the factors affecting the post-progression survival (PPS) after sorafenib treatment, additional analyses were conducted using fixed data obtained from our previous prospective study. Data on patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib were analyzed in view of patient characteristics at the time of tumor progression and the progression pattern (intra-/extrahepatic growth or emergence of new intra-/extrahepatic lesions). RESULTS: Of the 89 enrolled patients, 70 were diagnosed with disease progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Multivariate Cox's regression analysis revealed that Child-Pugh scores of ≥7, macrovascular invasion (MVI), and alpha-fetoprotein of >400 ng/mL were independent predictors of poor PPS. Although both extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) and MVI were characteristics of advanced HCC, EHM was not determined as a prognostic factor. Additionally, the emergence of new extrahepatic lesions also served as an independent indicator of a poor prognosis. The PPS of the patients was well stratified according to the index based on the sum of these prognostic factors, ranging from 0 to 4. CONCLUSIONS: Child-Pugh score of ≥7, AFP of >400 ng/mL, MVI, and new extrahepatic lesions at the time of progression may be utilized to assess the prognosis and taken into consideration when designing second-line trials.

Liver function assessment according to the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade has been proposed as a new, simple, and objective method of assessing liver function. However, there is lack of data in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We evaluated the correlations between the ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score, adverse events, and survival in 89 patients with advanced HCC who were prospectively treated with sorafenib. RESULTS: Majority of patients with ALBI grade 1 (14/15 patients, 93%) had a Child-Pugh score of 5. Patients with ALBI grade 2 had a wide range of liver function according to the Child-Pugh scores, with scores of 5, 6, 7, and ≥ 8. We divided ALBI grade 2 patients into ALBI grade 2A and 2B groups according to the median ALBI score among patients with ALBI grade 2. Although no significant difference was observed, the incidence of liver dysfunction in sorafenib-treated patients with ALBI grades 1, 2A, and 2B was 7%, 19%, and 35%, respectively. Overall survival in the ALBI grade 2B group was significantly shorter than that in the ALBI grade 1 and 2A groups. Thus, ALBI grade 2B was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in addition to elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase levels, increased serum alpha-fetoprotein level, and macrovascular invasion. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib may be indicated for all patients with advanced HCC and ALBI grade 1 and for some with ALBI grade 2. The subdivision of patients with ALBI grade 2 increases the utility of ALBI in identifying patients indicated for sorafenib therapy.

Intensity-Based Assessment of Microbubble-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Phase-Related Diagnostic Ability for Cellular Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

This prospective study aimed to elucidate the effect of phase-related quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with perflubutane microbubble agent to assess the cellular differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Intensity was analyzed in 94 lesions (19.4 ± 4.9 mm, 86 patients), 47 well-differentiated HCCs (wHCCs) and 47 moderately-differentiated HCCs (mHCCs): I(e) (early phase) = I(te) (tumor) - I(le) (liver), I(p) (post-vascular phase) = I(tp) (tumor) - I(lp) (liver), I(ep) = I(e) - I(p). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with the best cutoff value (I(e), 13.2, I(p), -4.5, I(ep), 21.3) for discriminating between wHCC and mHCC was 0.6922 for Ie, 0.7680 for Ip and 0.7925 for Iep, which indicated a significantly greater ability to differentiate between wHCC and mHCC compared with visual/qualitative assessment (early phase, 0.6170, p = 0.04; post-vascular phase, 0.6702, p = 0.01; both phases, 0.7021, p = 0.04). In conclusion, I(ep) was found to have the highest diagnostic ability, suggesting it is a promising parameter for the cellular differentiation of HCCs with CEUS.

Sorafenib treatment in Child-Pugh A and B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: safety, efficacy and prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and prognostic impact of baseline and early clinical markers in both Child-Pugh A and B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We prospectively studied 89 Japanese patients with HCC (Child-Pugh A, n = 59; Child-Pugh B, n = 30) who were started with sorafenib between May 2010 and July 2013. RESULTS: Frequency of sorafenib-related adverse events was almost similar between Child-Pugh score 5, 6, and 7 patients. The rate of liver dysfunction, including any grade encephalopathy, ≥ grade 3 ascites, or ≥ grade 3 bilirubin increased, in Child-Pugh score ≥8 group was significantly higher than that in the other groups. The median overall survival of Child-Pugh score 5, 6, 7 and ≥8 patients were 14.5, 11.1, 8.7 and 4.6 months, respectively. Patients in Child-Pugh score 6 had significantly longer OS than those in Child-Pugh score 7 (P = 0.049). Multivariate analysis identified macrovascular invasion (MVI), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Child-Pugh score and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) as baseline predictors of survival. However, extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) was not a significant prognostic factor. In addition, decrease in AFP level and development of hand-foot skin reaction within 4 weeks after sorafenib initiation were closely associated with favorable survival. CONCLUSION: It is possible that not only Child-Pugh score 5 and 6 but also 7 patients are eligible for future clinical trials with sorafenib or similar drugs. Various survival predictors identified in this study might be considered as stratification factor. Although both MVI and EHM is a phenotype of advanced HCC, MVI should be discriminated from EHM because of the prognostic impact on survival in sorafenib-treated advanced HCC patients.

Natural history of large regenerative nodules and dysplastic nodules in liver cirrhosis: 28-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Some follow-up studies of large regenerative nodules (LRNs) and dysplastic nodules (DNs) were reported previously. However, the pre-malignant potentiality of LRNs has remained controversial up to now. No LRNs showed malignant transformation in our previous study. We aimed to evaluate the pre-malignant potentiality of LRNs and DNs with a greater number of cases and longer follow-up periods. METHODS: From 1982 to 2005, 1,500 consecutive nodular lesions up to 2 cm in diameter were subjected to US guided thin-needle biopsy in cirrhotic patients at Chiba University Hospital. Of these lesions, 68 LRNs in 60 cases and 20 DNs in 22 cases were followed up for more than 6 months without any anti-cancer therapy. The last US examination was in 2010. The total study period was 28 years. We analyzed the histological findings and the clinical data of all cases retrospectively. The outcome of the lesions was examined. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 38.9 (16-119) months in LRNs and 31.9 (6-101 months) in DNs. Rate of nodule enlargement was higher in DNs (8/24 nodules, 33%) than LRNs (11/68 nodules, 16 %), (p = 0.0743, not significant). Rate of malignant transformation was also higher in DNs (10/24 nodules, 42%) than LRNs (9/68 nodules, 13%), (p = 0.0040, significant). The rate of disappearance in images was similar between LRNs and DNs. CONCLUSIONS: We should recognize LRN as low risk pre-malignant lesions whereas DNs as high risk lesions.

Transarterial chemoembolization with miriplatin plus epirubicin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using miriplatin plus epirubicin in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy of TACE was evaluated by dynamic computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) three months after the procedure according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer Study Group of Japan. Adverse events (AEs), including clinical symptoms, hematological toxicities and blood chemistry toxicities, were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0. RESULTS: Thirty patients with HCC received TACE with miriplatin (miriplatin group) and 29 patients received TACE with miriplatin plus epirubicin (miriplatin-plus-epirubicin group). AEs, such as anorexia and neutropenia, were observed more frequently in the miriplatin-plus-epirubicin group than in the miriplatin group (p=0.028 and 0.014, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of these AEs (grade 3/4) between groups. The objective response rate (ORR), including the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), was 76.7% in the miriplatin group and 58.6% in the miriplatin-plus-epirubicin group (p=0.224). The median time to progression (TTP) in the miriplatin group and the miriplatin-plus-epirubicin group was 8.2 and 6.1 months, respectively (p=0.123). CONCLUSION: Although TACE with miriplatin plus epirubicin was safe and tolerable, no additional anti-tumor effects were observed compared to TACE with miriplatin. Further analysis is required to refine the efficacy of TACE using miriplatin plus epirubicin.

Partial splenic embolization with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia often makes the introduction of systemic treatment difficult in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively evaluated the long-term effects of partial splenic embolization (PSE) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with HCC patients accompanied by thrombocytopenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with HCC complicated by severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count, <5.0 × 10(4)/mm(3)) were treated with PSE and TACE. Both the safety and platelet-increasing effect was evaluated in these patients. RESULTS: Seventeen of 21 patients (81.0%) showed increased platelet counts to ≥5.0 × 10(4)/mm(3). Subsequently, 13 patients (61.9%) successfully received systemic chemotherapy. Platelet counts and serum levels of total bilirubin, as well as neutrophil counts, improved significantly one month after treatment. However, serum levels of albumin and hemoglobin decreased significantly one month after treatment. Severe adverse events, including acute liver failure and portal vein thrombus, were observed in two patients. CONCLUSION: PSE with selective TACE made it possible for patients with HCC and severe thrombocytopenia to receive systemic chemotherapy. Although PSE with TACE was safe and tolerable for most patients, the extent of PSE with TACE in a wide area of the liver may increase the risk for fatal liver failure.

Efficacy of sorafenib in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the benefits of sorafenib therapy with continued transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in TACE-refractory patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed intermediate-stage HCC patients who underwent the first TACE. Patients were defined as TACE-refractory and divided into two cohorts: (1) patients who switched from TACE to sorafenib and (2) those who continued TACE. We evaluated the patient overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTDP; the time patients reached Child-Pugh C or developed advanced-stage HCC). RESULTS: A total of 509 patients with HCC underwent TACE. Of 249 intermediate-stage HCC patients undergoing the first TACE, 122 were deemed refractory. At the time they were identified as refractory, 20 patients converted to sorafenib, whereas 36 patients continued TACE. We excluded patients with Child-Pugh scores of ≥ 8, those with advanced-stage HCC, those who had undergone hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy or other systemic therapy, and those treated with best supportive care alone. The median TTDP and OS were 22.3 and 25.4 months, respectively, in the conversion group, and 7.7 and 11.5 months, respectively, in the continued group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that sorafenib conversion might prolong OS and TTDP in TACE-refractory patients with intermediate-stage HCC.

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization targeting portal vein tumor thrombus in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: We aimed to retrospectively examine the tolerability and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The efficacy of TACE in parenchymal tumors (parenchymal response) and PVTT (PVTT response) was separately evaluated by dynamic computed tomography 1 to 2 months after TACE according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL). Patients with complete remission plus partial response in parenchymal tumors and PVTT were assessed as parenchymal response-positive and PVTT response-positive, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 33 HCC patients with PVTT were analyzed. Grade 3/4 toxicities included elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels (69.7%), elevated alanine aminotransferase levels (54.5%), hyponatremia (6.1%), thrombocytopenia (6.1%), hyperbilirubinemia (3.0%), leukopenia (3.0%) and anemia (3.0%). All these findings returned to the pre-treatment levels within 1 month after TACE. The number of parenchymal response-positive/negative and PVTT response-positive/negative patients was 20/13 and 13/20, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that the cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in parenchymal response-positive (p=0.04) and PVTT response-positive (p<0.01) patients than in their negative counterparts. PVTT response was a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in multivariate analysis (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: TACE was feasible in HCC patients with PVTT and could improve their survival by showing direct therapeutic effect against PVTT.

A phase I/II trial of capecitabine combined with peginterferon α-2a in Patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Several pilot studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of combination therapy with pyrimidine fluoride and interferon for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.This study aimed to determine the recommended dose of capecitabine combined with peginterferon α-2a (Phase I) and evaluate its safety and efficacy for sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Phase II). METHODS: Capecitabine was administered daily on days 1-14, while peginterferon α-2a was administered on days 1, 8, and 15. The cycle was repeated every 21 days. The patients were scheduled to receive capecitabine [mg/(m(2)∙day)] and peginterferon α-2a (µg/week) at 3 dose levels in phase I: 1200 and 90 (level 1), 1600 and 90 (level 2), and 2000 and 90 (level 3), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. The recommended dose was level 3. Among the 24 patients receiving the drug at the recommended dosage, 2 (8 %) exhibited a partial response, 9 (38 %) exhibited stable disease, 10 (42 %) exhibited progressive disease, and 3 (13 %) were not evaluated. The median time to progression and overall survival were 3.0 months and 7.2 months, respectively. The most common toxicities were decreased white blood cell (88 %), neutrophil (88 %), and platelet counts (58 %); fatigue (50 %); and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (42 %). Four patients (17 %) discontinued treatment because of severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine at 2000 mg/(m(2)∙day) combined with peginterferon α-2a (90 µg/week) exhibited moderate, albeit manageable, toxicity and was declared as the recommended phase II dose. Further research is required to refine the efficacy of this combination.

A phase I/II study of S-1 with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is the sole molecular-targeted agent showing a survival benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of a combination of S-1 with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS: S-1 was administered during days 1-14 and sorafenib was administered every day. This treatment was repeated every 21 days. In phase I, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The dose of each drug was planned as follows: cohort 1: S-1 48 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 2a: S-1 48 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, cohort 2b: S-1 64 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 3: S-1 64 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, and cohort 4: S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day. In phase II, the patients were treated at the MTD to evaluate safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled in phase I. One of the six patients in cohort 1 and one of the six patients in cohort 3 experienced DLT. None of the three patients in cohort 2a experienced DLT and three of the four patients in cohort 4 experienced DLT. Therefore, cohort 3 was considered the MTD. Subsequently, 26 patients were enrolled in phase II. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were an increase of aspartate aminotransferase (38.5 %), thrombocytopenia (23.1 %), neutropenia (19.2 %), hyperbilirubinemia (15.4 %), an increase of alanine aminotransferase (15.4 %), hyponatremia (11.5 %), rash (11.5 %), and hypophosphatemia (11.5 %). Sudden death occurred in one patient (3.8 %). A patient (3.8 %) had a partial response, 15 (57.7 %) had stable disease, and 10 (38.5 %) had progressive disease. The median times to progression and overall survival were 2.4 and 10.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of S-1 and sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC was 64 mg/m(2)/day and 800 mg/day, respectively. This dose/regimen demonstrated substantial clinical activity among patients with advanced HCC.

Natural history of postvascular-phase iso-enhanced lesions on the sonogram in chronic liver diseases.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study examined the natural history of postvascular-phase iso-enhanced lesions (PIELs) on contrast-enhanced sonograms to determine the potential risk and predictive factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic liver diseases. METHODS: This prospective study included 87 PIELs on contrast-enhanced sonograms (postvascular-phase: 10 min post-injection of perflubutane microbubbles) in 72 patients with chronic liver diseases (45 males and 27 females; age 65.0 ± 10.8y; PIEL diameter 12.5 ± 4.2 mm). The PIELs were followed up by ultrasound/contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging at 3 to 6 months intervals. RESULTS: Twenty patients developed HCCs during the study period (median, 22.0 months). The cumulative risk of HCC occurrence was 7.9% at 1 year and 36.0% at 3 years. The presence of coexistent HCC (hazard ratio [HR], 4.975; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.729-14.316; P = 0.003) and alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL (HR, 4.104; 95% CI, 1.621-10.392; P = 0.003) were significant factors for the risk of HCC occurrence. Fourteen of these lesions were diagnosed as HCCs that developed from iso-enhanced lesions. Cumulative HCC occurrence rates from PIEL > 14 mm was 23.5% at 1 year and 46.3% at 3 years. Cox regression analysis showed that PIEL > 14 mm (HR, 6.780; 95% CI, 2.060-22.32; P = 0.002) and alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL (HR, 4.892; 95% CI, 1.559-15.350; P = 0.007) were statistically significant factors for HCC occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with coexistent HCC, alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL, or PIEL > 14 mm should be carefully monitored because of the high potential for HCC occurrence.

An open-label phase I/II study of tamibarotene in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: Tamibarotene is a synthetic retinoid expected to inhibit tumor-cell proliferation and to induce apoptosis by selective interaction with retinoic acid receptor α/ß. We conducted an open-label phase I/II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD), and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profiles for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed, measurable, unresectable HCC of Child-Pugh classification A or B and with no effective systemic or local therapies were eligible. In phase I, patients were assigned based on the 3 + 3 dose escalation criteria to receive tamibarotene at 8, 12, and 16 mg/day. The RD determined in phase I was employed for phase II. The planned sample size in phase II was 25, including the RD-treated patients in phase I. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled. No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 8 mg/day. However, two out of six patients experienced the DLTs at 12 mg/day: one experienced thrombosis in a limb vein and pulmonary artery, and the other experienced an increase of γ-GTP. The MTD and RD were determined as 12 and 8 mg/day, respectively. In phase II, one patient achieved partial response, and seven achieved stable disease. The disease control rate was 32 % (95 % CI: 15.0-53.5). The following drug-related serious adverse events were reported: thrombosis in a limb vein, pulmonary artery, and portal vein; interstitial lung disease; and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Tamibarotene demonstrated the inhibition of tumor cell growth in advanced HCC with acceptable tolerance.

Successful non-surgical treatment of ruptured pyogenic liver abscess.

A 72-year-old man with a fever and abdominal pain was referred to our hospital. On admission, the patient exhibited the clinical signs of septic shock. Computed tomography revealed a rim-and septal-enhanced lesion in the left lobe of the liver with hemorrhage along the hepatic capsule. Because Klebsiella pneumoniae was detected in both the blood and aspirated abdominal fluid, the patient was diagnosed with a ruptured pyogenic liver abscess. He was successfully treated with percutaneous abscess drainage and the systemic administration of antibiotics. Non-surgical treatment for a ruptured pyogenic liver abscess is therefore effective in at least some cases.

Metformin, a diabetes drug, eliminates tumor-initiating hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Metformin has been widely used as an oral drug for diabetes mellitus for approximately 60 years. Interestingly, recent reports showed that metformin exhibited an anti-tumor action in a wide range of malignancies including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the present study, we investigated its impact on tumor-initiating HCC cells. Metformin suppressed cell growth and induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Flow cytometric analysis showed that metformin treatment markedly reduced the number of tumor-initiating epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)(+) HCC cells. Non-adherent sphere formation assays of EpCAM(+) cells showed that metformin impaired not only their sphere-forming ability, but also their self-renewal capability. Consistent with this, immunostaining of spheres revealed that metformin significantly decreased the number of component cells positive for hepatic stem cell markers such as EpCAM and α-fetoprotein. In a xenograft transplantation model using non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice, metformin and/or sorafenib treatment suppressed the growth of tumors derived from transplanted HCC cells. Notably, the administration of metformin but not sorafenib decreased the number of EpCAM(+) cells and impaired their self-renewal capability. As reported, metformin activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) through phosphorylation; however its inhibitory effect on the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway did not necessarily correlate with its anti-tumor activity toward EpCAM(+) tumor-initiating HCC cells. These results indicate that metformin is a promising therapeutic agent for the elimination of tumor-initiating HCC cells and suggest as-yet-unknown functions other than its inhibitory effect on the AMPK/mTOR pathway.