Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dis Model Mech ; 15(3)2022 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35107131

ABSTRACT

Nucleoporin 98KD (Nup98) is a promiscuous translocation partner in hematological malignancies. Most disease models of Nup98 translocations involve ectopic expression of the fusion protein under study, leaving the endogenous Nup98 loci unperturbed. Overlooked in these approaches is the loss of one copy of normal Nup98 in addition to the loss of Nup96 - a second Nucleoporin encoded within the same mRNA and reading frame as Nup98 - in translocations. Nup98 and Nup96 are also mutated in a number of other cancers, suggesting that their disruption is not limited to blood cancers. We found that reducing Nup98-96 function in Drosophila melanogaster (in which the Nup98-96 shared mRNA and reading frame is conserved) de-regulates the cell cycle. We found evidence of overproliferation in tissues with reduced Nup98-96, counteracted by elevated apoptosis and aberrant signaling associated with chronic wounding. Reducing Nup98-96 function led to defects in protein synthesis that triggered JNK signaling and contributed to hallmarks of tumorigenesis when apoptosis was inhibited. We suggest that partial loss of Nup98-96 function in translocations could de-regulate protein synthesis, leading to signaling that cooperates with other mutations to promote tumorigenesis.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins , Animals , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/genetics , RNA, Messenger
2.
Front Genet ; 6: 19, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25691891

ABSTRACT

Since the earliest observations of cells undergoing mitosis, it has been clear that there is an intimate relationship between the cell cycle and nuclear chromatin architecture. The nuclear envelope and chromatin undergo robust assembly and disassembly during the cell cycle, and transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of histone biogenesis and chromatin modification is controlled in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Chromatin binding proteins and chromatin modifications in turn influence the expression of critical cell cycle regulators, the accessibility of origins for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell fate. In this review we aim to provide an integrated discussion of how the cell cycle machinery impacts nuclear architecture and vice-versa. We highlight recent advances in understanding cell cycle-dependent histone biogenesis and histone modification deposition, how cell cycle regulators control histone modifier activities, the contribution of chromatin modifications to origin firing for DNA replication, and newly identified roles for nucleoporins in regulating cell cycle gene expression, gene expression memory and differentiation. We close with a discussion of how cell cycle status may impact chromatin to influence cell fate decisions, under normal contexts of differentiation as well as in instances of cell fate reprogramming.

3.
Development ; 139(15): 2751-62, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22745316

ABSTRACT

SUMOylation is a highly conserved post-translational modification shown to modulate target protein activity in a wide variety of cellular processes. Although the requirement for SUMO modification of specific substrates has received significant attention in vivo and in vitro, the developmental requirements for SUMOylation at the cell and tissue level remain poorly understood. Here, we show that in Drosophila melanogaster, both heterodimeric components of the SUMO E1-activating enzyme are zygotically required for mitotic progression but are dispensable for cell viability, homeostasis and DNA synthesis in non-dividing cells. Explaining the lack of more pleiotropic effects following a global block of SUMO conjugation, we further demonstrate that low levels of global substrate SUMOylation are detected in mutants lacking either or both E1 subunits. These results not only suggest that minimal SUMOylation persists in the absence of Aos1/Uba2, but also show that the process of cell division is selectively sensitive to reductions in global SUMOylation. Supporting this view, knockdown of SUMO or its E1 and E2 enzymes robustly disrupts proliferating cells in the developing eye, without any detectable effects on the development or differentiation of neighboring post-mitotic cells.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Nuclear Proteins/physiology , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/physiology , Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Proteins/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Activating Enzymes/physiology , Animals , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , Crosses, Genetic , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Genomics , Homeostasis , Imaginal Discs/embryology , Ligases/metabolism , Mitosis , Models, Genetic , Mutation , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , RNA Interference , Salivary Glands/embryology , Ubiquitin-Activating Enzymes/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...