Measurement of Differential Renal Function by Scintigraphy in Hydronephrotic Kidneys: Importance of Conjugate Views for Accurate Evaluation.

PURPOSE: Traditionally a single posterior view is used to measure differential renal function during nuclear renal scintigraphy. Nevertheless, experimental data show important variation in this measurement in the setting of significant hydronephrosis. To date, the impact of degree of hydronephrosis on the accuracy of differential renal function determination has not been addressed. We evaluated the discrepancy between function measured by anterior and posterior views, and the relationship to varying degrees of hydronephrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scans from 2009 to 2011. Ultrasounds were reviewed and degree of hydronephrosis was recorded using anteroposterior pelvic diameter. Absolute percent difference in differential renal function between each view (anterior minus posterior) was calculated and correlated to anteroposterior pelvic diameter. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to anteroposterior pelvic diameter, ie less than 10 mm, greater than 10 mm, greater than 15 mm and greater than 25 mm. RESULTS: A total of 519 scans with corresponding ultrasounds were analyzed. Median patient age was 2.26 years. Kidneys with a larger anteroposterior pelvic diameter had a greater discrepancy in function on anterior and posterior views. There was a meaningful discrepancy for anteroposterior pelvic diameter greater than 10 mm (p = 0.034) and greater than 25 mm (p = 0.032). Several statistical models were used to identify a meaningful cut point of 15 mm, where the discrepancy in anterior and posterior views became significant (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of single views during nuclear renography for grossly hydronephrotic kidneys is often inaccurate. The discrepancy in differential renal function obtained on the anterior and posterior views is adversely impacted especially as anteroposterior pelvic diameter increases beyond 15 mm. Therefore, we suggest incorporation of conjugate views for estimating differential renal function in patients with hydronephrosis.

Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric pyeloplasty with double J (DJ) stent drainage requires manipulation of the uretero-vesical junction (UVJ) and a second anesthetic for removal. Externalized uretero-pyelostomy (EUP) stents avoid these issues. We report outcomes of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty with EUP compared to DJ stents in children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 76 consecutive children who underwent pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction over a 1-year period by 5 pediatric urologists at a single institution. The exclusion criteria included patients with concomitant urological procedures, other urinary drainage strategies, "stentless" pyeloplasty or patients without follow-up data. Based on surgeon preference, 24 patients had a EUP stent and 38 had a DJ stent placed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 23.8 ± 10.9 months and 21.1 ± 11.1 months for the EUP and DJ stent groups, respectively (p = 0.32). The mean age was 40 ± 54 months and 80 ± 78 months for the EUP and DJ groups, respectively (p = 0.04). The EUP group had a greater proportion of open pyeloplasties (n = 17, 71%) versus the DJ group (n = 16, 42%; p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, length of stay, and overall complication rate between groups. Complications were divided by timing of complication (intraoperative, before and after 3 months) and according to the Clavien Classification system. There were no statistically significant differences between these subgroups. The limitations of this study include small sample size, potential selection bias, and heterogeneity between both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pyeloplasty using EUP stents does not incur prolonged operative time, longer length of stay or higher complication rate when compared to DJ stents. Within the limitations of this study, EUP stents may be a safe alternative to DJ stents.

Preliminary report on a new surgical technique for the management of bothersome scrotomegaly in selected adolescent males.

Idiopathic scrotomegaly in adolescent boys can be a bothersome and distressing complaint. The challenge lies in accepting its potential impact on the patient's body image, offering a simple solution with minimal morbidity. Herein, we present a novel approach to reduction scrotoplasty, which adds to the limited published strategies available, and provides surgeons with a safe and effective procedure to correct this condition. Our report also calls attention to a potentially under-recognized medical problem in adolescents and young adults.

Inappropriate Use of Ultrasound in Management of Pediatric Cryptorchidism.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a limited role for ultrasound in the management of an undescended testicle (UDT). We hypothesized that ultrasound remains overused by referring physicians. Our goal was to characterize the trends, patterns, and impact of ultrasound use for UDT and to reaffirm its limited diagnostic value for this indication. METHODS: The records of boys aged 0 to 18 years with UDT in Ontario, Canada, between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed by using health administrative data housed at the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES). A second review of boys referred to our institution with UDT between 2007 and 2011 was conducted to complement the health administrative data. Trends in frequency, distribution, and costs of ultrasound use were assessed. Time delays between diagnosis and definitive management were compared between the ultrasound and non-ultrasound groups. Using our institutional data, we analyzed demographic patterns of ultrasound use and compared its diagnostic accuracy by using surgical findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: Ultrasound was used in 33.5% of provincial referrals and 50% of institutional referrals. Children who underwent ultrasound experienced an approximate 3-month delay in definitive surgical management. Ultrasound correctly predicted physical examination findings in only 54% of patients. Physicians in community practice, and those with fewer years in practice, were more likely to order ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound has limited value for the management of UDT but remains widely overused, with an increasing trend over time. This practice has negative implications for access to care and cost-containment. Widespread educational efforts should be undertaken, targeting current and future referring physicians.

The burden of attending a pediatric surgical clinic and family preferences toward telemedicine.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Indirect expenses for accessing health care may place significant fiscal strain on Canadian families. Telemedicine alternatives, using email, telephone, and video conferencing, can mitigate such financial burdens by reducing travel and related costs. Our objectives were to assess costs that families incur visiting an outpatient pediatric surgical clinic, and family attitudes toward telemedicine alternatives. METHODS: A survey was offered pre-consult to all families who attended pediatric urology and general surgery outpatient clinics over a three-month period. RESULTS: A total of 1032 of 1574 families screened participated (66.0%). Less than half (18.5%) of participants traveled over 200 km, and 32.9% spent over 4 hours in transit, round-trip. The proportion of participants who spent over $50 on travel and ancillary expenses was 33.0%. In 74.0% of families, 1 or more adults missed work. The proportion of families who perceived costs as somewhat high or high was 29.1%. Perceived cost was positively correlated to distance traveled, money spent, and missed work (p<0.01). Most were comfortable with medical communication using technology; and 34.3%-42.7% would avoid an in-person clinic visit utilizing email, telephone, and video conferencing. Higher perceived cost (p<0.001) and distance traveled (p<0.01) were only weakly associated with greater willingness to substitute a clinic visit with video conferencing. CONCLUSIONS: Many families face high costs related to routine outpatient clinical visits, and there is a substantial willingness by them to access telemedicine alternatives, rather than the traditional face-to-face clinical visit.

Urinary tract abnormalities in boys with recurrent urinary tract infections after hypospadias repair.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the development of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in boys who have undergone hypospadias repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all boys who had recurrent UTIs after primary or redo tubularized incised plate (TIP) or transverse island flap (TVIF) repairs, between 1998 and 2009. Data on age, operating details, postoperative complications and imaging studies were collected. We attempted to identify risk factors for recurrent UTIs after hypospadias repair. RESULTS: During the study period, 43/2249 boys (1.91%) were diagnosed with recurrent UTIs after hypospadias repair. The boys' mean (range) age at repair was 14 (6-24) months and the median (range) follow-up was 6.5 (1.5-11) years. Primary TIP and TVIF were performed in 47% (20/43) and 35% (15/43) of the boys, respectively. Redo surgeries were performed in 18% of the boys (8/43). The initial meatal location was proximal in all TVIF and redo repairs, and in one of the TIP repairs. Postoperative voiding cysto-urethrography, ultrasonography and dimercapto-succinic acid (DMSA) scans were performed in 58% (25/43), 90% (39/43) and 19% (8/43) of the boys, respectively. Abnormalities were noted. Of those boys who underwent a TVIF repair, urethral diverticula were seen in 47% (7/15) and urethral fistulae were also seen in 47% (7/15). Conversely, in those who had a TIP repair, an elevated PVR and vesico-ureteric reflux were more common; they were found in 40% (8/20) and 50% (10/20) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pathophysiology of recurrent UTI is multifactorial, but postoperative complications seem to vary with type of procedure. Recurrent UTIs after hypospadias surgery should prompt a specific assessment for potentially functionally relevant and correctable anatomical abnormalities.

Is there a role for prophylactic antibiotics after stented hypospadias repair?

PURPOSE: Data are lacking on prophylactic oral antibiotic use in stented hypospadias repair cases. We evaluated the role of prophylactic oral antibiotics for preventing symptomatic urinary tract infections in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed consecutive patients treated with stented primary/redo hypospadias repair by a single surgeon from September 2009 to January 2012. All patients received antibiotics upon induction. Before April 1, 2011, patients also received prophylactic oral antibiotics while stented. They were compared to those who underwent surgery after April 1, who received no prophylactic oral antibiotics. The primary outcome was symptomatic urinary tract infections, as captured from patient records and verified by an electronic cross-check of ICD-10 codes. Secondary outcomes included cellulitis, fistula, dehiscence and meatal stenosis. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients reviewed 11 were unstented and 1 underwent followup elsewhere. Of the remaining 149 patients 78 received prophylactic oral antibiotics and 71 did not. The groups were well matched for age, hypospadias characteristics, surgical technique and stent duration. Median followup was 17 months (range 0.2 to 33). No culture proven, symptomatic urinary tract infections developed in either group. One patient in the prophylactic group was treated for cellulitis by the pediatrician. The complication rate, including redo cases, was 18.2% in the prophylactic group and 15.3% in the nonprophylactic group (p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: When postoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics were not administered, we identified no increased incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections or complications. Our data suggest that prophylactic oral antibiotics may not be needed in cases of stented hypospadias repair. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the rational use of antimicrobials. It can potentially serve as a basis for a prospective, multicenter, randomized study.

Lower abdominal mass in a 16-year old adolescent: an unusual presentation of posterior urethral valves.

Posterior urethral valves (PUV) are now commonly suspected on antenatal ultrasound, but can present with a broad spectrum of severity postnatally. Rarely, the diagnosis is missed until adolescence or adulthood when the patient usually presents with lower urinary tract symptoms. We describe an even rarer case of PUV in an adolescent who first presented with renal failure and a palpable lower abdominal mass due to urinary retention. We review the literature on presentation, natural history and outcomes of both early and late presenting PUV cases.

A cost-analysis comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy: the McMaster Institute of Urology experience.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to identify and compare the costs of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) at our centre. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of our first 70 consecutive LRP cases and 70 consecutive RRP cases at St. Joseph's Healthcare in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. We performed cost analysis, including operating room costs, disposable instruments, blood transfusions, analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay. Overall expenses were then analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Preoperative patient demographics and disease stages were comparable between the LRP and RRP groups. On a per procedure basis, large discrepancies were found in mean disposable instrument costs (LRP = $659.18 vs. RRP = $236.59), operating room costs (LRP = $4278.00 vs. RRP = $3139.00), mean cost of blood transfusions (LRP = $21.00 vs. RRP = $394.34), mean analgesia requirements (LRP = $12.94 vs. RRP = $41.06) and mean hospital stay bed costs (LRP = $3690.00 vs. RRP = $5027.14). Overall, costs for all patients in the LRP and RRP groups, respectively, were $606 307.29 and $618 721.57 with a cost saving of $12 414.28 in favour of the LRP arm. CONCLUSION: At our institution, we found that LRP costs are slightly less than those for RRP. Higher operative time and disposable instrument expenses are offset by the shorter hospital stays, fewer blood transfusions and less analgesic requirements for the LRP group. Further financial advantages for LRP will likely be achieved with additional reduction of operating room time and by minimizing disposables.