ABSTRACT
Biomechanical study. To evaluate the performance of the contact surface for 3D printed patient-specific cages using CT-scan 3D endplate reconstructions in comparison to the contact surface of commercial cages. Previous strategies to improve the surface of contact between the device and the endplate have been employed to attenuate the risk of cage subsidence. Patient-specific cages have been used to help, but only finite-element studies have evaluated the effectiveness of this approach. There is a possible mismatch between the CT-scan endplate image used to generate the cage and the real bony endplate anatomy that could limit the performance of the cages. A cadaveric model is used to investigate the possible mismatch between 3D printed patient-specific cages and the endplate and compare them to commercially available cages (Medtronic Fuse and Capstone). Contact area and contact stress were used as outcomes. When PS cage was compared to the Capstone cage, the mean contact area obtained was 100 ± 23.6 mm2 and 57.5 ± 13.7 mm2, respectively (p < 0.001). When compared to the Fuse cage, the mean contact area was 104.8 ± 39.6 mm2 and 55.2 ± 35.1 mm2, respectively(p < 0.001). Patient-specific cages improve the contact area between the implant and the endplate surface, reducing the contact stress and the risk of implant subsidence during LIF surgeries.
Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Prostheses and Implants , Spinal Fusion/methodsSubject(s)
Knee Injuries/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Patellar Ligament/injuries , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Rupture/surgery , Adult , Humans , Knee Injuries/etiology , Male , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Patellar Ligament/surgery , Rupture/etiology , Tendons/transplantation , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
Variations of the sciatic nerve anatomy and blood supply are complex and largely not dealt with in common anatomy texts. Variations of the sciatic nerve anatomy can be divided into the height of division of its branches, relation of the branches to the piriformis muscle, and its blood supply. These variations should be well known to any surgeon operating in this anatomical region. It is unknown whether these variations increase the risk of surgical injury and consequent morbidity. This paper will review the current knowledge regarding anatomical variations of the sciatic nerve and its blood supply.
