Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 162(3): 338-44, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24300340

ABSTRACT

Estimation of the surface dose is very important for patients undergoing radiation therapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dose at the surface of a water phantom at a depth of 0.007 cm as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement with radiochromic films (RFs), thermoluminescent dosemeters and an ionisation chamber in a 6-MV photon beam. The results were compared with the theoretical calculation using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation software (MCNP5, BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc). The RF was calibrated by placing the films at a depth of maximum dose (d(max)) in a solid water phantom and exposing it to doses from 0 to 500 cGy. The films were scanned using a transmission high-resolution HP scanner. The optical density of the film was obtained from the red component of the RGB images using ImageJ software. The per cent surface dose (PSD) and percentage depth dose (PDD) curve were obtained by placing film pieces at the surface and at different depths in the solid water phantom. TLDs were placed at a depth of 10 cm in a solid water phantom for calibration. Then the TLDs were placed at different depths in the water phantom and were exposed to obtain the PDD. The obtained PSD and PDD values were compared with those obtained using a cylindrical ionisation chamber. The PSD was also determined using Monte Carlo simulation of a LINAC 6-MV photon beam. The extrapolation method was used to determine the PSD for all measurements. The PSD was 15.0±3.6% for RF. The TLD measurement of the PSD was 16.0±5.0%. The (0.6 cm(3)) cylindrical ionisation chamber measurement of the PSD was 50.0±3.0%. The theoretical calculation using MCNP5 and DOSXYZnrc yielded a PSD of 15.0±2.0% and 15.7±2.2%. In this study, good agreement between PSD measurements was observed using RF and TLDs with the Monte Carlo calculation. However, the cylindrical chamber measurement yielded an overestimate of the PSD. This is probably due to the ionisation chamber calibration factor that is only valid in charged particle equilibrium condition, which is not achieved at the surface in the build-up region.


Subject(s)
Film Dosimetry , Monte Carlo Method , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Skin/radiation effects , Water/chemistry , Calibration , Humans , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Software
2.
Z Med Phys ; 23(4): 270-8, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113373

ABSTRACT

One of the factors which influence the spatial resolution of a 2D detector array is the size of the single detector, another the transport of the secondary electrons from the walls into the measuring volume. In this study, the single ion chamber dose response function of an I'mRT MatriXX array was determined by comparison between slit beam dose profiles measured with the array and with EBT2 radiochromic film in a solid water-equivalent phantom at a shallow depth of 0.5cm and at a depth of 5cm beyond the depth dose maximum for a 6 MV photon beam. The dose response functions were obtained using two methods, the best fit method and the deconvolution method. At the shallow depth, a Lorentz function and at 5cm depth a Gaussian function, both with the same FWHM of 7.4mm within limits of uncertainty, were identified as the best suited dose response functions of the 4.5mm diameter single array chamber. These dose response functions were then tested on various dose profiles whose true shape had been determined with EBT2 film and with the IC03 ionization chamber. By convolving these with the Lorentz kernel (at shallow depth) and the Gaussian kernel (at 5cm depth) the signal profiles measured with the I'mRT MatriXX array were closely approximated. Thus, the convolution of TPS-calculated dose profiles with these dose response functions can minimize the differences between calculation and measurement which occur due to the limited spatial resolution of the I'mRT MatriXX detector.


Subject(s)
Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Conformal/instrumentation , Transducers , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Photons , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Med Phys ; 37(3): 155-8, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22973083

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work is to study the influence of the patient size and geometry on CBCT Hounsfield Unit and the accuracy of calibration Hounsfield Unit to electron density (HU-ED) using patient specific HU-ED mapping method for dose calculation. Two clinical cases, namely nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) case and prostate case for 4 patients with different size and geometry were enrolled to assess the impact of size and geometry on CBCT Hounsfield Unit. The accuracy of the patient specific HU-ED mapping method was validated by comparing dose distributions based on planning CT and CBCT, dose-volume based indices and the digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) by analyzing their line profile plots. Significant differences in Hounsfield unit and line profile plots were found for NPC and prostate cases. The doses computed based on planning CT data sets and CBCT datasets for both clinical cases agree to within 1% for planning target volumes and 3% for organs at risk. The data shows that there are high dependence of HU on patient size and geometry; thus, the use of one CBCT HU-ED calibration curve made of one size and geometry will not be accurate for use with a patient of different size and geometry.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...