ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: India, world's leading Tuberculosis burden country envisions to End-TB by optimally engaging private-sector, in-spite of several unsuccessful attempts of optimal private sector engagement. Private Provider Interface Agency (PPIA), a new initiative for private-sector engagement, studied the private-sector networking and dynamics to understand the spread, typology of providers and facilities and their relations in TB case management, which was critical to design an intervention to engage private-sector. We report the observations of this exercise for a larger readership. METHOD: ology: It is a descriptive analysis of mapping data (quantitative) and perceived factors influencing their engagement in the PPIA network (qualitative). RESULTS: Of 7396 doctors, 2773 chemists and 747 laboratories mapped, 3776 (51%) doctors, 353 (13%) chemists and 255 (34%) laboratories were prioritized and engaged. While allopathic doctors highly varied between wards (mean ratio 48/100,000 population; range 13-131), non-allopathic doctors were more evenly distributed (mean ratio 58/100,000 population; range 36-83). The mean ratio between non-allopathic to allopathic doctors was 1.75. Return benefit, apprehension on continuity of funding and issues of working with the Government were top three concerns of private providers during engagement. Similarly, irrational business expectations, expectation of advance financing for surety and fear of getting branded as TB clinic were three top reasons for non-engagement. CONCLUSION: A systematic study of dynamics of existing networking, typology and spread of private providers and using this information in establishing an ecosystem of referral network for TB control activities is crucial in an effort towards optimal engagement of private health providers. Understanding the factors influencing the network dynamics helped PPIA in effective engagement of private health providers in the project.
