Outcomes of surveillance versus adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IA and IB nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: Currently, it is accepted that risk assessment of clinical stage I (CS I) nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) patient is mainly dependent on the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Initial active surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) are acceptable treatment options for these patients, but there is no uniform consensus. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of active surveillance with adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 201 patients with CS I NSGCT after orchiectomy were included. Outcomes of active surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic significance of risk factors for survival and relapse was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 201 patients, 110 (54.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while the remaining 91 patients (45.3%) underwent surveillance. Relapses were significantly higher for patients underwent surveillance compared to adjuvant chemotherapy group (18.3 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate for patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly better than those of patients underwent surveillance (97.6 vs. 80.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the presence of LVI (p = 0.01) and treatment option (p < 0.001) were prognostic factors for RFS and pT stage (p = 0.004) and invasion of rete testis (p = 0.004) and the presence of relapse (p < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors for OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that the treatment strategy was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (p < 0.001, HR 0.54). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that treatment options (p = 0.031), embryonal carcinoma (EC) >50% (p = 0.013) and tumor diameter (p = 0.016) were found to be independent factors for predicting relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved RFS compared with surveillance for CS I NSGCT patients. Moreover, the treatment strategy is an important prognostic indicator for RFS and a predictive factor for relapse. Although adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be a suitable treatment for patients with risk factors for relapse, surveillance is still preferred management option.

Treatment preferences in stage IA and IB testicular seminoma: multicenter study of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 75 % of patients with testicular seminoma present with stage I disease, and the probability of long-term survival approaches 100 %. However, the standard adjuvant treatment for stage I seminoma patients remains controversial, and there is no uniform consensus in the literature. The present study was performed to evaluate treatment preference and outcomes for men with stage I testicular seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, 282 patients with histologically confirmed stage IA and IB testicular seminoma who underwent orchiectomy were included. The outcomes of three management options and survivals were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic significance of risk factors for relapse on survival was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis; in addition, the factors predicting relapse were also evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 282 patients with stage I seminoma, 130 (46.1) received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), 80 (28.4 %) were treated with adjuvant carboplatin, while the remaining 72 patients (25.5 %) underwent surveillance. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up period of 38.5 months; relapses were observed in 16 patients (22.3 %) on surveillance, in one patient (1.2 %) treated with adjuvant carboplatin and in ten patients (%7.7) who received adjuvant RT. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for patients who underwent surveillance was worse than those of patients treated with adjuvant carboplatin and RT (64.2 vs. 97.7 vs. 91.9 %, respectively; p < 0.001). However, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for patients on surveillance was similar compared with the adjuvant treatment groups (100 vs. 92.3 vs. 97.4 %, respectively; p = 0.44). Univariate analysis showed that only the treatment approach (surveillance vs. adjuvant carboplatin vs. adjuvant RT) for DFS (p < 0.001), invasion of the rete testis (p = 0.041) and the presence of relapse (p < 0.001) for OS were important prognostic indicators. Multivariate analysis indicated that the treatment strategy for DFS (p < 0.001, HR 0.34) was an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, a logistic regression analysis showed that adjuvant treatment was found to be an independent factor for predicting relapse (p = 0.004, odds ratio: 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that adjuvant treatment with carboplatin or RT is associated with improved DFS compared with surveillance for men with stage I testicular seminoma after orchiectomy. Moreover, the treatment strategy is an important prognostic indicator for DFS and a predictive factor for relapse. Although adjuvant treatment, especially carboplatin, seems to be a suitable treatment for patients with risk factors for relapse, surveillance is still feasible and the preferred management option after radical orchiectomy in men with stage I seminoma. More reliable predictive factors are needed to make treatment decisions.

Outcome of 561 non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients: multi-center experience from Turkey.

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancers account for 15% of breast carcinomas and, when present as early-stage disease, they are associated with higher rates of recurrence and early distant metastasis risk when compared to hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2) positive breast cancers. In this study we aimed to explore the basic clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors and recurrence patterns of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients. METHODS: In this study 561 non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer female patients admitted to 8 different cancer centers in Turkey between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively evaluated through their medical records, to identify the basic clinico-pathological characteristics, prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. RESULTS: The ratio of triple-negative breast cancer was 12%. The median age of patients was 48 years, of whom 311 (55.4%) were premenopausal. The majority had early-stage breast cancer at the time of diagnosis (16.8% stage I, 48.1% stage II, 35.1 % stage III) and the most commonly identified variant was invasive ductal carcinoma (84.1%). Grade II and III tumors were 27.1 and 48.5%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 90.5% of women and adjuvant radiotherapy to 41.2%. Median patient follow up was 28 months (range 3-290). During the follow up period 134 (23.8%) patients developed metastatic disease. In most of these cases, metastatic sites were bone, soft tissue, and lung. Factors affecting disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were age (both p<0.001), lymph node involvement (both p<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p<0.001 and p=0.004, respectively), tumor stage (both p<0.001), adjuvant administration of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (both <0.001) and type of surgery (not significant for DFS but p=0.05 for OS). Three-year DFS and OS were 72.0 and 93.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Age, lymph node involvement, LVI, stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy were determined as prognostic factors for DFS and OS. The most common recurrence sites were bone, soft tissue and the lung. Further prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm the prognostic and predictive factors identified in this study.

Radioiodine treatment of hyperthyroidism: prognostic factors affecting outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment in patients with hyperthyroidism and to evaluate prognostic factors affecting outcome. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Our cohort comprised 115 consecutive patients with hyperthyroidism treated with RAI at the Endocrinology Clinic at the Farabi Hospital, Trabzon, between 1994 and 2002. Data were retrieved from the endocrinology clinic database. Patients were categorized into three diagnostic groups: Graves' disease (GD), toxic multinodular (TMN) hyperthyroidism, and toxic adenoma. Our policy, over the period of the study, was to offer a single fixed first dose (10 mCi) 131I to all patients with toxic nodular goiter (TNG) for the first time and to all patients with relapsed GD. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the cure rate between GD and TNG, but Graves' patients had a significantly higher incidence of hypothyroidism (p < 0.001). In contrast, incidence of euthyroidism was significantly increased in TNG than those of the patients with GD (p < 0.05). The incidences of hyperthyroidism, euthyroidism, cure rate, and persistent hyperthyroidism did not vary significantly between females and males. Age at onset of hyperthyroidism at diagnosis was not associated with outcome of RAI therapy. The incidence of hypothyroidism in patients who had nonpalpable goiter was higher than those in patients who had medium or large goiter (p < 0.05). The means of serum FT3 and TT4 at presentation were correlated with the development of hypothyroidism after RAI therapy. Logistic regression analysis showed serum FT3 concentration at presentation to be significant contributing factor to failure to respond to a single dose of RAI. Patients who had higher FT3 concentrations at diagnosis were more likely to fail to respond to RAI therapy. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study of a cohort of patients with hyperthyroidism demonstrate that a single fixed dose of 10 mCi of RAI is highly effective in curing GD as well as toxic nodular hyperthyroidism. Therefore, treatment protocols for these groups should be identical. The most important factors that determine efficacy of RAI treatment are serum FT3 concentrations at diagnosis before the initiation of treatment and goiter size. Therefore, these factors should be taken into consideration when planning treatment. If such factors are present, the initial dose of RAI should be increased.

Therapeutic Trial of Cobalamin in Patients with Normal Serum Cobalamin Levels and Predicted Cobalamin Deficiency.

Diagnosis of cobalamin deficiency can be difficult due to the variation in clinical presentation and lack of specificity of the laboratory findings. Although hypersegmentation and macrocytosis are important findings observed in cobalamin deficiency they are not sensitive and spesific. Additionally, cobalamin assays in commercial laboratories, being not reliable, makes the diagnosis more difficult. The metabolite assays, such as the total homocysteine and methylmalonic acid are costly, which restricts their widespread routine use. Our aim was to find out problems in diagnosis of cobalamin deficiency in general practice, and establish a better and cost-effective decision strategy for the diagnosis of this common clinical entity. Fifty patients with the diagnosis of cobalamin deficiency were retrospectively evaluated with respect to diagnosis. Normal cobalamin levels were observed at presentation in eight (16%) patients. Reticulocyte crisis was observed in all patients on the seventh day of cobalamin replacement therapy and all hematological parameters returned to normal at the end of three months of treatment. In anemic patients with clinical and biochemical findings suggestive of megaloblastic anemia, even though serum cobalamin level is normal, a therapeutic trial of cobalamin is cost effective and prevents delay in diagnosis.