Humerus fractures: selecting fixation for a successful outcome.

Current evidence suggests at least one-third of humeral shaft fractures initially managed nonoperatively will fail closed treatment, and this review highlights surgical considerations in those circumstances. Although operative indications are well-defined, certain fracture patterns and patient cohorts are at greater risk of failure. When operative intervention is necessary, internal fixation through an anterolateral approach is a safe and sensible alternative. Determining which patients will benefit most involves shared decision-making and careful patient selection. The fracture characteristics, bone quality, and adequacy of the reduction need to be carefully evaluated for the specific operative risks for individuals with certain comorbid conditions, inevitably balancing the patient's expectations and demands against the probability of infection, nerve injury, or nonunion. As our understanding of the etiology and risk of nonunion and symptomatic malunion of the humeral diaphysis matures, adhering to the principles of diagnosis and treatment becomes increasingly important. In the event of nonunion, respect for the various contributing biological and mechanical factors enhances the likelihood that all aspects will be addressed successfully through a comprehensive solution. This review further explores specific strategies to definitively restore function of the upper extremity with the ultimate objective of an uninfected, stable union.

High rate of avascular necrosis but excellent patient-reported outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fracture dislocations: should ORIF be considered as primary treatment?

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture dislocations, excluding 2-part greater tuberosity fracture dislocations, are rare injuries. Outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these injuries have not been well described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic and functional outcomes of patients who underwent ORIF of a proximal humerus fracture dislocation. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients who underwent ORIF of a proximal humerus fracture dislocation between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fracture dislocations were excluded. The primary outcome was American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score at a minimum of 2 years. Secondary outcomes were the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) and reoperation rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 45 years (standard deviation 16), and 77% were men. Median time to reduction and surgery was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5). There were 2 (8%) Neer 2-part fractures, 7 (27%) 3-part, and 17 (65%) 4-part fractures. Fifty-four percent (54%) involved the anatomic neck and 31% included a head-split component. Thirty-nine percent (39%) were anterior dislocations. The rate of AVN was 19%. The reoperation rate was 15%. Reoperations included removal of hardware (2), subscapularis repair (1), and manipulation under anesthesia (1). No patients went on to arthroplasty. ASES scores were available for 22 patients (84%) including 4 of 5 patients with AVN. The median ASES score at a mean of 6.0 years postoperatively was 98.3 (IQR 86.7-100, range 63.3-100) and was not different in those with or without AVN (median 98.3 vs. 92.0, P = .175). Only the presence of medial comminution and nonanatomic head shaft alignment on postoperative radiographs were associated with increased risk of AVN. CONCLUSION: Radiographic rates of AVN (19%) and reoperation (15%) were high in this series of patients undergoing ORIF of proximal humerus fracture dislocations. Despite this, none of the patients required arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at an average of 6 years postinjury were excellent, with a median ASES score of 98.5. ORIF should be considered as primary method of treatment in proximal humerus fracture dislocations not only in young patients but also middle-aged patients.

Suture button placed beneath plate fixation for complex distal clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint injuries: a technical note.

Patients with complex distal clavicle and acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are at risk of loss of reduction, especially when plates are removed postoperatively. The purpose is to review the authors' preferred technique for treatment of distal clavicle and AC joint injuries utilizing combined suture button and plate fixation, aiming to optimize biomechanical strength of fixation and limit loss of reduction after implant removal. Pre-contoured locking plates or hook plates were utilized atop suture buttons to maintain reduction and optimize biomechanical strength. At final follow-up over one year after plate removal and suture button retention in thirteen patients, reduction was maintained to coracoclavicular interval 1.5 ± 1.4 mm less than contralaterally. DASH scores at final follow-up averaged 5.7 ± 2.5 (range: 3.3 - 11.7). Placing suture button fixation prior to and beneath plate fixation in complex AC joint injuries and distal clavicle fractures allows for maintained fixation and prevents loss of reduction after plate removal.

Anatomic Osteochondral Allograft Reconstruction for Concomitant Large Hill-Sachs and Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions.

Glenohumeral instability causing bipolar bone loss is increasingly being recognized and treated to minimize recurrence. Large Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions of the humerus must be addressed at the time of surgery to prevent recurrent dislocations and restore the native anatomic track. For patients with epilepsy, locked dislocations may create defects that must be addressed with bony procedures, including osteochondral allograft reconstruction as soft-tissue remplissage may not adequately addresses the magnitude of the bone loss. Osteochondral allografts have been successfully used to address bony defects ranging from 20% to 30% of humeral bone loss whereas shoulder arthroplasty is indicated for larger defects where the native anatomy can no longer be restored. In this Technical Note, we present a technique to address concomitant large Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Classification Systems for Radiographic Complications After Radial Head Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Although several classifications are used to assess radiographs following radial head arthroplasty (RHA), including the Popovic classification for radiolucency, the Chanlalit classification for stress shielding (SS), the Brooker classification for heterotopic ossification (HO), and the Broberg-Morrey classification for radiocapitellar arthritis, little is known about the reliability of these classification systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of these classifications. METHODS: Six orthopedic surgeons at various levels of training reviewed elbow radiographs of 20 patients who underwent RHA and classified them according to the Popovic, Chanlalit, Brooker, and Broberg-Morrey classifications for radiolucency, SS, HO, and RHA, respectively. Four weeks after initial review, radiographic reviews were repeated. Reliability was measured using the Fleiss kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Agreement was interpreted as none (<0), slight (0.01-0.2), fair (0.21-0.4), moderate (0.41-0.6), substantial (0.61-0.8), and almost perfect (0.81-1) based on agreement among attending surgeons. RESULTS: Among fellowship-trained attending surgeons, interobserver reliability was slight for SS (Chanlalit) and the categorical interpretation of radiolucency (Popovic), fair for radiocapitellar arthritis (Broberg-Morrey) and HO (Brooker), and substantial for the ordinal interpretation of radiolucency (Popovic). Residents had a higher interobserver reliability than attending physicians when using the Brooker classification. Mean intraobserver reliability was fair for SS (Chanlalit) and the categorical interpretation of radiolucency (Popovic), moderate for HO (Brooker) and radiocapitellar arthritis (Broberg-Morrey), and almost perfect for the ordinal interpretation of radiolucency (Popovic). Trainees had higher intraobserver reliability than attending surgeons using the SS (Chanlalit) classification. CONCLUSIONS: The number of Popovic zones is reliable for communication between physicians, but caution should be taken with the Brooker, Chanlalit, Broberg-Morrey, and categorical interpretation of the Popovic classifications. All the classifications had better intraobserver than interobserver reliability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Reliability of classification systems for radiographic complications after RHA is less than substantial except the number of zones of radiolucency; therefore, caution is required when drawing conclusions based on these classifications.

Femoral Neck Fractures in Young and Middle-Aged Adults: Pearls and Pitfalls.

The management of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged adults remains challenging. Although the influence of timing on the outcome is controversial, surgical management within 12 hours is recommended. Reduction quality is the most important modifiable factor that is correlated with outcomes. The rates of osteonecrosis and nonunion remain high and the patients need to be informed of this at the beginning of treatment.

Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Pearls and Pitfalls in Managing Difficult Fractures.

Intertrochanteric hip fractures are among the most common osteoporotic fractures seen by orthopaedic surgeons. These fractures have a significant effect on a patient's mobility, independence, and mortality. In addition, they represent a substantial component of health care spending. Treatment is almost universally surgical, and surgeons must pay attention to patient optimization, fracture characteristics, and surgical planning. The goal of surgical intervention is to maximize the patient's ability to return to preinjury level of function by early postoperative mobilization. This can be achieved by obtaining and maintaining reduction to fracture healing.

Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Management of subtrochanteric femur fractures is challenging because of the multiple planes of fracture deformity. Specific techniques starting with patient positioning and appropriate operating room table selection can improve the efficiency of the surgery. Sequential reduction techniques starting with closed methods, percutaneous techniques, and finally open clamping can be performed to obtain anatomic reduction of the fracture. The gold standard implant for definitive fixation is a locked intramedullary nail and overall outcomes are excellent if anatomic alignment and stable fixation is achieved.

Difficult Diaphyseal Femur Fractures: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Diaphyseal femur fractures are common injuries globally and range in complexity. The most common mechanism worldwide is motor vehicle accidents. Initial evaluation should include Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol and evaluation of the soft tissues, neurovascular examination, and associated injuries. The gold standard for treatment is a closed functional reduction (restoration of length, alignment, and rotation) and fixation with a reamed, statically locked, intramedullary nail. Fracture pattern, associated injuries, and patient factors can increase the difficulty of treatment. Malrotation and limb length discrepancy are not uncommon. Awareness of the problem and knowledge of the how to obtain and verify adequate reduction is critical. Diagnosis of malrotation and/or limb length discrepancy should prompt a detailed discussion of the deformity and treatment options with the patient. Most patients recover remarkably well from diaphyseal femur fractures. They should be followed until union and return to prior functional level with a watchful eye placed on any warning signs of complications such as nonunion and infection.

Fractures of the Talus and Pantalar Dislocations.

Talar fractures and pantalar dislocations are usually the results of high-energy trauma. Dislocations and open injuries are managed urgently. Temporary stabilization with splinting, Kirschner wires, or external fixation may be performed until the soft tissues are ready for definitive fixation. A CT scan is critical to identify all injuries and is helpful in planning treatment including reduction of dislocations and definitive fixation. Lateral and posterior process fractures are often missed initially and require a high index of suspicion.

Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneus Fractures: Extensile Lateral and Less Invasive Approaches.

Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is controversial and must be individualized by patient and fracture type. With an extensile lateral approach, all components of the deformity in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures can be addressed. The extensile lateral approach is indicated in more complex fracture patterns and when delay of surgery is necessary because of severe soft-tissue injury beyond 2 to 3 weeks. Careful patient selection, proper surgical timing, incision placement, and soft-tissue handling minimize the high rate of wound healing complications associated with the extensile lateral approach. The goals of surgical treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures may also be achieved using less invasive approaches, such as the sinus tarsi approach and closed reduction with percutaneous fixation, decreasing the risk of wound complications. Multiple factors influence determination of the specific approach.

Incidence and risk factors of clinically important venous thromboembolism in tibial plateau fractures.

While there are multiple reports on venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with several orthopedic procedures, the knowledge regarding incidence and risk factors of VTE in tibial plateau fractures is limited. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of clinically important venous thromboembolism (CIVTE) in patients with tibial plateau fractures. All adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of tibia plateau fractures between 2003 and 2018 in our level 1 trauma center were included in the study. All patients suspected CIVTE were assessed by the ultrasonography and/or CT scan. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and CIVTE Variables. Thirty-nine of 462 patients (8.4%) developed clinically important venous thromboembolism, in which pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were observed in 18 (3.9%) and 21 (4.54%) patients, respectively. Male gender (OR 9.75; 95% CI 2.34-40.66), spine injury (OR 9.51; 95% CI 3.39-26.64), other extremity injury (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.58-8.66), length of stay in ICU (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.2) were all risk factors for CIVTE. The incidence of CIVTE in tibial plateau fracture was relatively high (8.4%); The male gender, spine injury, other extremity injury, length of stay in ICU were the independent risk factors.

Public Insurance Payment Does Not Compensate Hospital Cost for Care of Long-Bone Fractures Requiring Additional Surgery to Promote Union.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the total hospital costs associated with the treatment of lower extremity long-bone fracture aseptic and septic unhealed fracture, to determine if insurance adequately covers these costs, and to examine whether insurance type correlates with barriers to accessing care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Level II trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing operative treatment of OTA/AO classification 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, and 43 fractures between 2012 and 2020 at a single Level II trauma center with minimum of 1-year follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the total cost of treatment for all hospital-based episodes of care. Distance traveled from primary residence was measured as a surrogate for barriers to care. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients with uncomplicated fracture healing, 82 with aseptic unhealed fracture, and 44 with septic unhealed fracture were included in the final cohort. The median cost of treatment for treatment of septic unhealed fracture was $148,318 [interquartile range(IQR) 87,241-256,928], $45,230 (IQR 31,510-68,030) for treatment of aseptic unhealed fracture, and $33,991 (IQR 25,609-54,590) for uncomplicated fracture healing. The hospital made a profit on all patients with commercial insurance, but lost money on all patients with public insurance. Among patients with unhealed fracture, those with public insurance traveled 4 times further for their care compared with patients with commercial insurance (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Septic unhealed fracture of lower extremity long-bone fractures is an outsized burden on the health care system. Public insurance for both septic and aseptic unhealed fracture does not cover hospital costs. The increased distances traveled by our Medi-Cal and Medicare population may reflect the economic disincentive for local hospitals to care for publicly insured patients with unhealed fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anatomic Radial Head Arthroplasty: The Importance of Implant Angle.

PURPOSE: Multifragmentary radial head and neck fractures not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation are usually treated with radial head arthroplasty (RHA). Although the optimal implant design is still subject to debate, anatomic designs are common. We hypothesized that positioning of the implant leading to increased radial stem angle (RSA) (angle of the RHA stem with respect to the proximal radius shaft, RSA) in anatomic RHA designs will contribute to failures. The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of RHA failure with respect to the stem angle in anatomic RHA design. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent anatomic RHA for acute fractures between 2006 and 2019 at 2 academic centers was conducted. Initial postoperative elbow radiographs were reviewed to measure RSA on the anterior-posterior and lateral views. Radiolucency, stress shielding, and radiocapitellar arthritis were also evaluated. Implant failure was defined as prosthesis removal or revision. RESULTS: Implant failure was associated with significantly larger lateral RSA than that in intact implants. Increasing stem shaft angle on a lateral radiograph was associated with decreased implant survival. Radiolucency, stress shielding, and radiocapitellar arthritis were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic radial head implants are commonly used; however, the importance of prosthesis positioning, specifically that of the stem within the proximal radius, remains understudied. Higher RSA is associated with the risk of implant failure and need for revision. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Protocol-based interdisciplinary co-management for hip fracture care: 3 years of experience at an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary standardized protocols for the care of patients with hip fractures have been shown to improve outcomes. A hip fracture protocol was implemented at our institution to standardize care, focusing on emergency care, pre-operative medical management, operative timing, and geriatrics co-management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this protocol. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients admitted to a single tertiary care institution who underwent operative management of a hip fracture between July 2012 and March 2020. Comparison of patient characteristics, hospitalization characteristics, and outcomes were performed between patients admitted before and after protocol implementation in 2017. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients treated for hip fracture were identified: 313 before and 204 after protocol implementation. Average age, average Charlson Comorbidity Index, percent female gender, and distribution of hip fracture diagnosis did not vary significantly between groups. There was a significant reduction in time from admission to surgical management, from 37.0 ± 47.7 to 28.5 ± 27.1 h (p = 0.0016), and in the length of hospital stay, from 6.3 ± 6.5 to 5.4 ± 4.0 days (p = 0.0013). The percentage of patients whose surgeries were performed under spinal anesthesia increased from 12.5 to 26.5% (p = 0.016). There was no difference in 90-day readmission rate or mortality at 30 days, 90 days, or 1 year between groups. CONCLUSION: With the implementation of an interdisciplinary hip fracture protocol, we observed significant and sustained reductions in time to surgery and hospital length of stay, important metrics in hip fracture management, without increased readmission or mortality. This has implications to minimize health care costs and improve outcomes for our aging population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, therapeutic.

Preoperative Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: A Guide to Diagnosis-Based Treatment.

Perioperative pain management remains an important focus of both patient and provider attention in orthopaedic trauma surgery. There is a constant effort to improve pain management while decreasing opioid consumption, and peripheral nerve blocks are a safe and effective way to achieve these two goals. This is particularly relevant because more procedures are being done in outpatient surgery centers, and the need to safely provide analgesia without the systemic risk of opioid medications is paramount. The primary goal of this article was to describe the diagnosis-based approach for the utilization of preoperative peripheral nerve blocks in perioperative care for orthopaedic trauma surgery procedures based on the experience and current practice at our center.

Intraoperative Fluoroscopy for Correcting Rotational Malalignment After Fixation of Tibial Shaft Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: A 29-year-old man previously treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for a right tibial shaft fracture presented with complaint of the foot pointing outward compared with uninjured side. He was diagnosed with tibial malrotation, and a novel intraoperative imaging technique was used for correction. CONCLUSION: Literature suggests that the prevalence of tibial malrotation after IMN fixation is greater than previously thought. This case highlights the need for a simple and reliable intraoperative approach to guide and confirm correction of tibial malrotation after IMN fixation, and it demonstrates a technique that can be implemented with immediate results.

2021 John Charnley Award: A protocol-based strategy when using hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures decreases mortality, length of stay, and complications.

AIMS: While interdisciplinary protocols and expedited surgical treatment improve the management of hip fractures in the elderly, the impact of such interventions on patients specifically undergoing arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture is not clear. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of an interdisciplinary protocol for the management of patients with a femoral neck fracture who are treated with an arthroplasty. METHODS: In 2017, our institution introduced a standardized interdisciplinary hip fracture protocol. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture between July 2012 and March 2020, and compared patient characteristics and outcomes between those treated before and after the introduction of the protocol. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were treated before the introduction of the protocol (35 (22.3%) with a THA), and 114 patients were treated after its introduction (37 (32.5%) with a THA). The demographic details and medical comorbidities were similar in the two groups. Patients treated after the introduction of the protocol had a significantly reduced median time between admission and surgery (22.8 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 18.8 to 27.7) compared with 24.8 hours (IQR 18.4 to 43.3) (p = 0.042), and a trend towards a reduced mean time to surgery (24.1 hours (SD 10.7) compared with 46.5 hours (SD 165.0); p = 0.150), indicating reduction in outliers. Patients treated after the introduction of the protocol had a significantly decreased rate of major complications (4.4% vs 17.2%; p = 0.005), decreased median hospital length of stay in hospital (4.0 days vs 4.8 days; p = 0.008), increased rate of discharge home (26.3% vs 14.7%; p = 0.030), and decreased one-year mortality (14.7% vs 26.3%; p = 0.049). The 90-day readmission rate (18.2% vs 21.7%; p = 0.528) and 30-day mortality (3.7% vs 5.1%; p = 0.767) did not significantly differ. Patients who underwent HA were significantly older than those who underwent THA (82.1 years (SD 10.4) vs 71.1 years (SD 9.5); p < 0.001), more medically complex (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 6.4 (SD 2.6) vs 4.1 (SD 2.2); p < 0.001), and more likely to develop delirium (8.5% vs 0%; p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: The introduction of an interdisciplinary protocol for the management of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture was associated with reduced time to surgery, length of stay, complications, and one-year mortality. Such interventions are critical in improving outcomes and reducing costs for an ageing population. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):3-8.

How to Avoid Failures in Tibial Plafond Fractures.

Tibial plafond fractures include a wide spectrum of injuries that show their complexity. Soft-tissue injury in tibial plafond fractures is much more important than bony injury. Commonly, a staged treatment, that is, temporary external fixation followed by definitive surgery when the soft tissue is ready, is performed. Knowledge of multiple surgical approaches is a prerequisite for open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plafond fractures because of the large variation of fracture patterns.