Reduction of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with permanent pacemakers as a predictor of heart failure and mortality outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Frequent right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with cardiomyopathy. The impact of RV pacing on left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) and clinical outcomes is unclear. METHODS: We analyzed GLS via two-dimensional speckle tracking and LV ejection fraction (EF) on pre- and post-implantation transthoracic echocardiograms of patients undergoing dual chamber pacemaker implantation. We collected long-term data on strain, LVEF, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients (mean age 76 ± 12 years; 59 [54%] female) were followed for mean 23 ± 17 months. Mean baseline LVEF was 58 ± 11% and mean GLS was -17 ± 4%. Twenty-four (22%) patients had an absolute decrease in LVEF > 10% and 43 (39%) patients had a relative reduction of GLS > 15%. Among patients with a reduction of GLS, a larger proportion of patients had RV pacing burden ≥20% (67% vs. 46%; p = .048). Compared to patients without GLS reduction, more patients with a reduction in GLS reached a composite endpoint of HF hospitalization, CRT upgrade or death (47% vs. 16%; p = .001). CONCLUSION: Reduction in LV GLS was seen in nearly four in 10 patients undergoing pacemaker implantation and was significantly associated with increased RV pacing burden. LV GLS reduction was associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. LV GLS may have utility in predicting outcomes among patients with RV pacing.

Population-Level Prevalence of Rare Variants Associated With Atrial Fibrillation and its Impact on Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Whole exome sequencing may identify rare pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (LPVs) that are linked to atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of LPVs associated with AF on a population level on outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the association of LPVs with AF and their impact on clinical outcomes using the UK Biobank, a national repository of participants with available whole exome sequencing data. METHODS: A total of 200,631 individuals in the UK Biobank were studied. Incident and prevalent AF, comorbidities, and outcomes were identified using self-reported assessments and hospital stay operative, and death registry records. LPVs were determined using arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy gene panels with LOFTEE and ClinVar to predict variants of functional significance. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, there was a modestly increased prevalence of LPVs among 9,585 patients with AF (2.0% vs 1.7%, respectively; P = 0.01). Among those with prevalent AF at <45 years of age, 4.2% were LPV carriers. LPVs in TTN and PKP2 were associated with AF with adjusted odds ratios of 2.69 (95% CI: 1.57-4.61) and 2.69 (95% CI: 1.54-4.68), respectively. There was no significant difference in combined ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality among patients who have AF with and without LPVs (25.1% vs 23.8%; P = 0.49). Among participants with AF and available cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data, LPV carriers had lower left ventricular ejection fractions than non-LPV carriers (42% vs 52%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF had a modestly increased prevalence of LPVs. Among reference arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy genes, the contribution of rare variants to AF risk at a population level is modest and its impact on outcomes appears to be limited, despite an association of LPVs with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction among patients with AF.

Managing Opioid Withdrawal for Hospital Patients in Custody.

Dr. Brown, a hospitalist, admits Mark, a patient transferred from a local jail for management of cellulitis. The patient, who was taken into custody two days prior to hospital admission, has a history of intravenous heroin use. Mark explains that he had been prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance therapy for opioid use disorder for several years prior to being arrested and had not used other opioids during that time. As a policy, the jail where Mark is detained does not prescribe opioid agonists, and his maintenance therapy was stopped upon his arrival there. Dr. Brown discovers that Mark is diaphoretic and appears distressed. Mark's symptoms suggest to Dr. Brown that, in addition to having cellulitis, Mark is actively withdrawing from opioids. Mark tells Dr. Brown that he has felt "horrible" since his buprenorphine-naloxone therapy was stopped and that he now has intense cravings for opioids. He asks Dr. Brown to help alleviate the withdrawal symptoms. Dr. Brown, who is accustomed to treating opioid withdrawal with opioid replacement therapy, wonders if she should initiate ORT for Mark while he is in the hospital.

Extent of resection and overall survival for patients with atypical and malignant meningioma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with atypical and malignant meningioma is guarded; whether the extent of resection is associated with survival-based outcomes in this population remains poorly defined. This study investigated the association between gross total resection (GTR) and all-cause mortality in patients with atypical and malignant meningioma. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify 575 and 64 patients betweens the ages of 18 and 70 years who were diagnosed with atypical and malignant meningioma, respectively, between 2004 and 2009. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the adjusted impact of GTR versus subtotal resection on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar for patients who did undergo GTR and patients who did not undergo GTR. The 5-year overall survival rates were 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.2%-94.5%) and 78.2% (95% CI, 70.0%-84.3%) for patients with atypical meningioma who did and did not undergo GTR, respectively, and 64.5% (95% CI, 45.9%-78.1%) and 41.1% (95% CI, 17.9%-63.1%) for patients with malignant meningioma who did and did not undergo GTR, respectively. After adjustments for available, pertinent confounding variables, GTR was associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients with atypical (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.67; P < .001) and malignant meningioma (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of resection is a powerful predictor of outcome for patients with atypical and malignant meningioma. These data highlight the hazard associated with the presence of gross tumor bulk after surgery and suggest a value for more extensive resections that should be balanced against the additional potential morbidity.