Safety and Efficacy of Protamine Administration for Prevention of Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing TAVR.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether protamine administration for heparin reversal after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) reduces bleeding complications and affects patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: Occurrence of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This study included 873 patients undergoing TAVR, of whom 677 received protamine for heparin reversal. Standard access management included the use of pre-closure devices, manual compression, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or implantation of a covered stent graft, if necessary. The study complied with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and life-threatening and major bleeding, occurred less frequently in the protamine administration group (3.2%) compared with the control group (8.7%) (p = 0.003). This was driven mainly by lower rates of life-threatening and major bleeding in the protamine group (0.1% vs. 2.6% [p < 0.001] and 1.0% vs. 4.1% [p = 0.008], respectively). Furthermore, protamine administration resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay (11.1 ± 5.8 days vs. 12.7 ± 7.8 days; p = 0.05). In the overall cohort, stroke was observed in 1.9% and myocardial infarction in 0.2% of patients, with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that only protamine administration (odds ratio: 0.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.58; p = 0.001) and acute kidney injury (odds ratio: 5.82; 95% confidence interval: 2.02 to 16.77; p = 0.001) were independently associated with the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Protamine administration resulted in significantly lower rates of life-threatening and major bleeding complications compared with patients without heparin reversal. Occurrence of stroke and myocardial infarction was not increased by protamine administration.

Prognostic impact of cancer history in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of TAVI in cancer patients is currently unclear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate prognostic impact of cancer status (active cancer or previous cancer) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Consecutive TAVI patients in the Heart Center Bonn were enrolled and we stratified the patients into three groups: current cancer (active cancer), non-current cancer (previous cancer), or no cancer. The primary outcome was all-cause death within a 5-year follow-up. We evaluated mean aortic pressure gradient (mPG) values following TAVI (baseline mPG) and at the final follow-up (follow-up mPG). RESULTS: In total, 1568 TAVI patients were eligible and 298 patients (19.0%) had active or previous cancer. At the 5-year follow-up, cancer patients had a significantly worse prognosis than non-cancer patients (log rank, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, previous cancer was a significant predictor for 5-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001). Estimated mortality rates at 5-year follow-up rates among active cancer, previous cancer, and non-cancer were 84.0%, 65.8%, and 50.2% (long-rank P < 0.001), respectively. The hazard ratios of active cancer and previous cancer for 5-year mortality were 2.79 (P < 0.001) and 1.38 (P = 0.019) compared to non-cancer patients. We found significantly higher mPG during follow-up than at baseline in cancer patients (follow-up 8.10 vs baseline 7.40 mmHg; Wilcoxon P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Active, and also previous, cancer status are associated with less beneficial long-term prognosis in TAVI patients.