Has There Been a Shift in Use of Subacute Rehabilitation Instead of Hospice Referral Since Immunotherapy Has Become Available?

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has rapidly become the mainstream treatment of multiple cancer types. Since the first drug approval in 2011, we have noted a decline in referrals from inpatient oncology to hospice and an increase in referrals to subacute rehabilitation (SAR) facilities, possibly with the aim of getting strong enough for immunotherapy and other promising drugs. This study explores outcomes after discharge to SAR, including rates of cancer-directed therapy after SAR, overall survival, and hospice use. METHODS: We performed an electronic chart review of patients discharged from our inpatient oncology units to SAR facilities from 2009 to 2017. Demographics, admission statistics, and post-discharge outcomes were gathered from discharge summaries and targeted chart searches. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-eight patients were referred to SAR 413 times. One hundred seventy-four patients (49%) returned to the oncology clinic before readmission or death, and only 117 (33%) ever received additional cancer-directed treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, or immunotherapy). Among all discharges, 28% led to readmissions within 30 days. Seventy-four patients (21%) were deceased within 30 days, only 31% of whom were referred to hospice. Palliative care involvement resulted in more frequent do not resuscitate code status, documented goals of care discussions, and electronic advance directives. CONCLUSION: A growing number of oncology inpatients are being discharged to SAR, but two thirds do not receive additional cancer therapy at any point, including a substantial fraction who are readmitted or deceased within 1 month. These data can help guide decision making and hospital discharge planning that aligns with patients' goals of care. More clinical data are needed to predict who is most likely to benefit from SAR and proceed to further cancer therapy.

Early Identification of Intracranial Hemorrhage Using a Predictive Nomogram

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictive signs and symptoms occurring in hospitalized adults with hematologic malignancies with intracranial hemorrhage (IH).
. SAMPLE & SETTING: In a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer center, a retrospective matched case-control design included adult inpatients with hematologic malignancies with (n = 39) and without (n = 39) IH.
. METHODS & VARIABLES: Conditional logistic regression, t test, and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess increased risks for IH and the development of a prognostic nomogram with signs, symptoms, and laboratory values relevant to IH. 
. RESULTS: Composite outcomes for signs, symptoms, and laboratory values were included in a prognostic nomogram that had good discriminative ability to predict IH, with a bootstrap corrected concordance index of 0.766 (95% confidence interval [0.657, 0.866]) and good calibration. Prognostic nomogram predicted patients with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (greater than 30.6), headache, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 140 or greater were more likely to have IH. 
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses should recognize that patients with the combination of prolonged APTT, SBP of 140 or greater, and headache are more likely to have IH.

Implementing the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in an Ambulatory Clinic for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications can occur in patients receiving cancer treatment and are the most common cause of death not directly related to malignancy. Established international best practices for recognition and management of early sepsis with bundled interventions reduce sepsis-related morbidity and mortality in many patient populations. Integration of these practices is common in emergency departments but has not been documented in ambulatory oncology clinics, where many patients with cancer present for evaluation of infectious symptoms. OBJECTIVES: The current quality improvement project embedded sepsis best practices into routine care for ambulatory clinic patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic disease or malignancies. METHODS: An interprofessional protocol was implemented that included guideline-based universal screening, nurse-activated standing orders for recommended interventions, and clinician-supported decision making for the first six hours. FINDINGS: Evaluation of implementation of the protocol showed improved timeliness and adherence to sepsis practice guidelines. Postintervention adherence to threshold times for obtaining blood cultures and blood lactate and start of antibiotics showed improvement. All recommended interventions were completed within the target time frame for the majority of patients.

The incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding among 1514 patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: implications for VTE prevention.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly diagnosed among individuals with hematologic malignancies. However, the risk of VTE among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is unclear. We examined the incidence and risk factors for VTE and bleeding among 1514 patients undergoing in-patient HSCT. No protocolized VTE prophylaxis was used. By HSCT day 180, 75 symptomatic VTE occurred in 70 patients (4.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6%-5.8%). Fifty-five (3.6%) were catheter-associated, 11 (0.7%) were non-catheter-associated deep venous thromboses, and 9 (0.6%) were pulmonary emboli. Thirty-four percent of VTE occurred at a platelet count less than 50 x10(9)/L; 13% occurred at a platelet count less than 20 x10(9)/L. In multivariate analysis, VTE was associated with prior VTE (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.6) and with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.0). Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 230 patients (15.2%; 95% CI, 13.4%-17.1%); 55 patients (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.7%-4.7%) had fatal bleeding. Bleeding was associated with anticoagulation (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.8-5.5), GVHD (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.8-3.3), and veno-occlusive disease (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6). In HSCT patients, VTE is primarily catheter-related and 3-fold less common than clinically significant bleeding. These findings warrant consideration when selecting VTE prophylaxis in HSCT patients.