Preseptal cellulitis with Streptococcus pyogenes complicated by streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: A case report and review of literature.

Preseptal cellulitis, an infection of the eyelid and skin around the eye, can be distinguished from orbital cellulitis. It is common in children and is rarely complicated. Streptococcus pyogenes is one of the major pathogens causing preseptal cellulitis. Here, we report a case of a 46-year-old man with carcinoma of unknown primary presenting preseptal cellulitis of S. pyogenes complicated by streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and multiple metastatic abscesses involving right eyelid, subcutaneous tissue in the scalp, mediastinum, bilateral pleural spaces, pericardial space, and the left knee. Although he required a prolonged hospitalization, antibiotic therapy and multiple courses of debridement led to full recovery. A literature review revealed that there were only four cases of preseptal cellulitis with S. pyogenes in adults and two cases were complicated by streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The cases had either trauma or immunocompromising factors similar to our patient. All patients survived with antibiotic therapy and debridement, and the functional outcome was favorable. In summary, preseptal cellulitis caused by S. pyogenes can be severe in adult cases where immunocompromising factors and type of strain may play a role in the severity of the disease. Awareness of the risk of severe complications, treatment with appropriate antibiotic therapy, and timely debridement are crucial for favorable prognoses.

Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and nafamostat mesilate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat combined with favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment study in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive favipiravir alone (n = 24) or nafamostat with favipiravir (n = 21). The outcomes included changes in the World Health Organization clinical progression scale score, time to improvement in body temperature, and improvement in oxygen saturation (SpO2). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the changes in the clinical progression scale between nafamostat with favipiravir and favipiravir alone groups (median, -0.444 vs -0.150, respectively; least-squares mean difference, -0.294; P = 0.364). The time to improvement in body temperature was significantly shorter in the combination group (5.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-7.0) than in the favipiravir group (9.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-18.0; P =0.009). The changes in SpO2 were greater in the combination group than in the favipiravir group (0.526% vs -1.304%, respectively; least-squares mean difference, 1.831; P = 0.022). No serious adverse events or deaths were reported, but phlebitis occurred in 57.1% of the patients in the combination group. CONCLUSION: Although our study showed no differences in clinical progression, earlier defervescence, and recovery of SpO2 were observed in the combination group.

Identification of Odoribacter splanchnicus bacteremia using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA sequencing: A case report.

Odoribacter splanchnicus was recently reclassified from the genus Bacteroides. We present the first case of Odoribacter splanchnicus bacteremia following appendicitis. The species was identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and later confirmed with 16S rRNA sequencing. The patient was successfully managed with surgery and antibiotic administration for two weeks.