Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 19(4): 1137-46, 2001 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11181679

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the incidence and outcomes of bleeding and chemotherapy dose modifications associated with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000/microL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred nine patients with solid tumors or lymphoma were followed-up during 1,262 chemotherapy cycles complicated by thrombocytopenia for development of bleeding, delay or dose reduction of the subsequent cycle, survival, and resource utilization. The association between survival and bleeding or dose modification was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Predisposing factors were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: Bleeding occurred during 9% of cycles among patients with previous bleeding episodes (P <.0001), baseline platelets less than 75,000/microL (P <.0001), bone marrow metastases (P =.001), poor performance status (P =.03), and cisplatin, carboplatin, carmustine or lomustine administration (P =.0002). Major bleeding episodes resulted in shorter survival and higher resource utilization (P <.0001). Chemotherapy delays occurred during 6% of cycles among patients with more than five previous cycles (P =.003), radiotherapy (P =.03), and disseminated disease (P =.04). They experienced similar clinical outcomes but used significantly more resources. Dose reductions occurred during 15% of cycles but were not associated with poor clinical outcomes or excess resource utilization. Significantly shorter survival and higher resource utilization were observed among the 20% of patients who failed to achieve an adequate response to platelet transfusion. CONCLUSION: The incidence of bleeding is low among solid tumor patients overall but exceeds 20% in some subgroups. These subgroups are easily identifiable using routinely available clinical information. A clinical prediction rule is being developed. Poor response to platelet transfusion is a clinically and financially significant downstream effect of thrombocytopenia and warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/economics , Hemorrhage/etiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Patient Care/economics , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/complications , Humans , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Lymphoma/economics , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasms/mortality , Platelet Transfusion , Proportional Hazards Models
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 18(21): 3699-706, 2000 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11054443

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether antibiotic regimens with similar rates of response differ significantly in the speed of response and to estimate the impact of this difference on the cost of febrile neutropenia. METHODS: The time point of clinical response was defined by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of alternative objective and subjective definitions. Data from 488 episodes of febrile neutropenia, treated with either of two commonly used antibiotics (coded A or B) during six clinical trials, were pooled to compare the median time to clinical response, days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and estimated costs. RESULTS: Response rates were similar; however, the median time to clinical response was significantly shorter with A-based regimens (5 days) compared with B-based regimens (7 days; P =.003). After 72 hours of therapy, 33% of patients who received A but only 18% of those who received B had responded (P =.01). These differences resulted in fewer days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization with A-based regimens (7 and 9 days) compared with B-based regimens (9 and 12 days, respectively; P <.04) and in significantly lower estimated median costs ($8,491 v $11,133 per episode; P =.03). Early discharge at the time of clinical response should reduce the median cost from $10,752 to $8,162 (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Despite virtually identical rates of response, time to clinical response and estimated cost of care varied significantly among regimens. An early discharge strategy based on our definition of the time point of clinical response may further reduce the cost of treating non-low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Fever/drug therapy , Neutropenia/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fever/economics , Fever/etiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/economics , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/economics , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/etiology , Health Care Costs , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/complications , Neutropenia/economics , Prospective Studies , Quality of Health Care , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...