ABSTRACT
A pilot study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose FUDR administered through the hepatic artery for the treatment of cancer involving the liver. Three dose schedules were used beginning with a dose of 0.5 mg FUDR/kg/day for 2 weeks followed by normal saline infusion for 2 weeks (schedule A). Elevation of serum bilirubin was the sole indication to deescalate to schedule B (0.3 mg FUDR/kg/day for two weeks followed by saline infusion for 4 weeks). Tolerance to this schedule escalated the patient to schedule C (0.5 mg FUDR/kg/day for 2 weeks followed by normal saline infusion for 4 weeks). Eighteen patients were treated, sixteen with metastatic colon cancer, one with metastatic leiomyosarcoma, and one with hepatoma. The patient with hepatoma developed progressive disease after one cycle of therapy. Of the 17 patients with metastatic cancer only 5 patients failed therapy yielding a 70% response rate. High-dose FUDR was well tolerated with only six patients requiring deescalation to schedule B. Elevation of alkaline phosphatase and glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase was universal. Two patients developed peptic ulceration. Sclerosing cholangitis was not observed. We conclude that high-dose FUDR administered through the hepatic artery is as safe as conventional dose infusion therapy but probably not more effective. The safety of high-dose FUDR infusion therapy suggests that sclerosing cholangitis is association with hepatic arterial infusion therapy is not related to the FUDR dose.
Subject(s)
Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Floxuridine/administration & dosage , Hepatic Artery , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
It has been documented that changes in the histopathologic subtype of small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) may occur after chemotherapy. The significance of such changes with respect to response to treatment has not yet been studied. In a retrospective review of 25 patients, we correlated their response from chemotherapy with morphologic changes seen in subsequent histologic material. Eleven patients responded to therapy and 14 failed to respond. A difference in original histologic subtype was found in 10 (71%) of the nonresponders and in only two (18%) of the responders. The difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). We conclude that patients with "pure" SCCL in the initial biopsy specimen who fail to respond to chemotherapy are likely to have mixed or combined histologic subtypes in subsequent tissue specimens, although we cannot preclude their pre-existence. An attempt to search for different histologic subtypes is warranted in patients who do not respond to chemotherapy regimens considered to be efficacious in SCCL.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Small Cell/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Carcinoma, Small Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
There is no evidence that combination chemotherapy is superior to single agents in the treatment of advanced, hormone-resistant carcinoma of the prostate. We are reporting the preliminary results of a randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide (CTX) with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM'). Thirty-one patients were randomized and 30 of them were evaluable for response. Sixteen patients were treated with CTX and 14 with FAM'. On the CTX arm, eight (50%) of the patients had stable disease (SD) and eight (50%) had progressive disease (PD). On the FAM' arm, one (7%) patient had partial response (PR), five (36%) patients had SD and eight (57%) failed to respond. The difference in response rates between the two regimens was not significant (P greater than .72). The median time to progression (MTP) of all patients treated with CTX was six weeks and the MTP of patients treated with FAM' was 16 weeks (P less than .007). This difference in MTP could be explained in part by the unequal time to reevaluation between the two regimens. The MTP of the responders on CTX however, was 13 weeks, while for FAM' it was 33 weeks (P = .014). This difference suggests that FAM' has superior activity to CTX. Pain alleviation was seen in 25% of patients treated with CTX and in 64% of those treated with FAM' (P less than .01). Toxicity was tolerable on both regimens. We conclude that CTX and FAM' have similar response rates. Patients treated with FAM' enjoyed longer MTP and greater pain alleviation than those treated with CTX.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Inflammation/chemically induced , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Mitomycin , Mitomycins/administration & dosage , Mitomycins/adverse effects , Mucous Membrane/drug effects , Mucous Membrane/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Platelet Count , Random Allocation , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Twenty-four patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with a chemotherapeutic regimen consisting of 5-fluorouracil, CCNU, and vincristine (FCV). Twenty patients were evaluable for response and 22 were evaluable for drug toxicity. One patient (5%) showed partial response, eight patients (40%) had stabilization of disease, and the remaining 11 patients (55%) had progression of disease. There was no statistically significant difference between the median survivals of patients with stabilization and of those with progression of their disease (p greater than 0.01). We were unable to demonstrate objective efficacy of the FCV regimen in the schedule used.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Clinical Trials as Topic , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Lomustine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Vincristine/administration & dosageABSTRACT
We treated 19 patients who had hormone-resistant adenocarcinoma of the prostate (stage D-2) with 5-FU, doxorubicin, and mitomycin (FAM'). All patients had extremely poor prognostic factors. Of the 16 patients evaluable for response, 44% had stabilization of disease and 56% had progressive disease. The median survival time for the stable disease group was 48 weeks, whereas that for the nonresponders was 26 weeks. The difference in survival time was statistically significant (P less than 0.002). The FAM' regimen was well-tolerated with minimal nausea, no vomiting, and moderate hematologic toxicity.