Monte Carlo dosimetry of the 60Co sources of a new GZP3 HDR afterloading system.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to obtain the dosimetric parameters of the new GZP3 60Co high-dose-rate afterloading system launched by the Nuclear Power Institute of China, which is comprised of two different 60Co sources. METHODS: The Monte Carlo software Geant4 and EGSnrc were employed to derive accurate calculations of the dosimetric parameters of the new GZP3 60Co brachytherapy source in the range of 0-10 cm, following the formalism proposed by American Association of Physicists in Medicine reports TG43 and TG43U1. Results of the two Monte Carlo codes were compared to verify the accuracy of the data. The source was located in the center of a 30-cm-radius theoretical sphere water phantom. RESULTS: For channels 1 and 2 of the new GZP3 60Co afterloading system, the results of the dose-rate constant (Λ) were 1.115 cGy h-1 U-1 and 1.112 cGy h-1 U-1, and for channel 3 they were 1.116 cGy h-1 U-1 and 1.113 cGy h-1 U-1 according to the Geant4 and EGSnrc, respectively. The radial dose function in the range of 0.25-10.0 cm in a longitudinal direction was calculated, and the fitting formulas for the function were obtained. The polynomial function for the radial dose function and the anisotropy function (1D and 2D) with a [Formula: see text] of 0°-175° and an r of 0.5-10.0 cm were obtained. The curves of the radial function and the anisotropy function fitted well compared with the two Monte Carlo software. CONCLUSION: These dosimetric data sets can be used as input data for TPS calculations and quality control for the new GZP3 60Co afterloading system.

Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND Cervical cancer (CC) is the most frequent type of cancer among women and its poor prognosis is a main concern, while the prognostic factors for CC have still remained controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, influencing overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) of CC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The electronic databases of PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for identification of eligible studies published until June 2021. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses and assessment of publication bias were also conducted. RESULTS We selected 140 studies that involved 47 965 patients for the meta-analysis. The results revealed that age, cell type, depth of tumor invasion, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, hemoglobin level, histological grade, leukocytosis, lymph node involvement, lymph-vascular space invasion, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, parametrial invasion, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, resection margin, squamous cell carcinoma antigen level, thrombocytosis, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor volume were clinicopathological factors influencing OS and EFS of CC patients (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study comprehensively identified the prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, influencing OS, and EFS of CC patients. However, further large-scale prospective studies should be conducted to verify our findings and develop more accurate prognostic models for CC.

Effect of the dwell time deviation constraint on brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the effect of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) on brachytherapy treatment for cervical cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on 20 patients with radical cervical cancer. The DTDC values changed from 0.0 to 1.0 by a step size of 0.2. We adjusted the optimization objectives to ensure that all plans were optimized to a high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) D90 (the dose to 90% of the HRCTV) = 6 Gy, while keeping the dose to the organs at risk as low as possible. The dose-volume histogram parameters and the dwell time data were compared between plans with different DTDC values. RESULTS: The HRCTV volume covered by 150% of the prescription dose gradually increased with increasing DTDC values. As the DTDC value increased from 0.0 to 1.0, the effective dwell point proportion increased from 61.78% to 90.30%. The mean dwell time initially decreased with an increase in the DTDC value, reached the minimum value at DTDC = 0.8, then slightly increased at DTDC = 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: When using inverse planning simulated annealing optimization for radical cervical cancer cases, the recommended DTDC value is approximately 0.6 if the organ dose needs to be limited.

Dosimetric and delivery comparison of helical tomotherapy with dynamic jaw and fixed jaw for cervical carcinoma.

Context: Recently, the dynamic jaw mode has been introduced in our radiation oncology center second in China. Many studies showed that dynamic jaw mode in helical tomotherapy (HT) has the potential to improve organs at risk avoidance. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the plan quality and efficiency of dynamic jaw delivery compared to the regular HT delivery mode (fixed jaw mode) for cervical carcinoma. Settings and Design: Plan quality and efficiency were compared among the fixed jaw 2.5 cm mode, the dynamic jaw 2.5 cm mode, and the dynamic jaw 5.0 cm mode. Subjects and Methods A total of 20 patients with cervical carcinoma were chosen to compare the plan quality and treatment efficiency using regular HT mode (fixed jaw 2.5 cm field width) and HT dynamic jaw mode with width 2.5 cm and 5.0 cm field width. The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to planning target volume. Target coverage, homogeneity, conformity, sparing of organs at risk (OARs), monitor unit, and beam-on time were evaluated. Statistical Analysis Used: : The statistical significance of any difference among plans assessed the two-sided paired t-test. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 software. Results: For each of the 20 patients, the plans were clinically acceptable. The target coverage and sparing of most OARs were measured using the dynamic jaw. Conclusions: Cervical carcinoma should be treated with the dynamic jaw 2.5 cm mode. Considering the risk of long treatment time, the dynamic jaw 5.0 cm mode could be an option.

An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate an implementation method and the results of an inverse dose optimization algorithm, Gradient Based Planning Optimization (GBPO), for three-dimensional brachytherapy. METHODS: The GBPO used a quadratic objective function, and a dwell time modulation item was added to the objective function to restrict the dwell time variance. We retrospectively studied 4 cervical cancer patients using different applicators and 15 cervical cancer patients using the Fletcher applicator. We assessed the plan quality of GBPO by isodose lines for the patients using different applicators. For the 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, we utilized dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of HR-CTV (D100%, V150%) and organs at risk (OARs) (D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc) to evaluate the difference between the GBPO plans and the IPSA (Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing) plans, as well as the GBPO plans and the Graphic plans. RESULTS: For the 4 patients using different applicators, the dose distributions are conformable. For the 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, when the dwell time modulation factor (DTMF) is less than 20, the dwell time deviation reduces quickly; however, after the DTMF increased to 100, the dwell time deviation has no remarkable change. The difference in dosimetric parameters between the GBPO plans and the IPSA plans is not statistically significant (P>0.05). The GBPO plans have a higher D100% (3.57 ± 0.36, 3.38 ± 0.34; P<0.01) and a lower V150% (55.73 ± 4.06, 57.75 ± 3.79; P<0.01) than those of the Graphic plans. The differences in other DVH parameters are negligible between the GBPO plans and the Graphic plans. CONCLUSIONS: The GBPO plans have a comparable quality as the IPSA plans and the Graphic plans for the studied cervical cancer cases. The GBPO algorithm could be integrated into a three-dimensional brachytherapy treatment planning system after studying more sites.

Feasibility of using calibrated cone-beam computed tomography scans to validate the heart dose in left breast post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: In post-mastectomy radiotherapy, high-conformal techniques are a valid method for determining the dose distribution around a target. However, the proximity of critical structures is a reason for concern. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using calibrated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans as a valid tool for a timely heart dose evaluation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 170 retrospective CBCT scans of 17 patients who underwent high-conformal post-mastectomy irradiation. The delivered doses that were calculated using personalized calibrated CBCT were compared with the doses planned, using the dose-volume histogram dosimetric parameters. RESULTS: The heart volume that was evaluated using CBCT presented a mean increase of 6%; this discrepancy impacted the heart dose in 4 of 17 patients, with an absolute increase of V25 Gy (range, 2.5%-7.6%) and an increase in the mean dose (range, 1.1-3.4 Gy). The dose for the target, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Using CBCT to monitor the dose that is delivered to the heart is feasible, allowing for a timely shift to an adaptive plan if clinically necessary.

Impact of positioning errors in the dosimetry of VMAT left-sided post mastectomy irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) adopted in post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has the capacity to achieve highly conformal dose distributions. The research aims to evaluate the impact of positioning errors in the dosimetry of VMAT left-sided PMRT. METHODS: A total of 18 perturbations where introduced in 11 VMAT treatment plans that shifted the isocenter from its reference position of 3, 5, 10 mm in six directions. The thoracic wall and supraclavicular clinical target volumes (CTVs), the heart and the left lung dose volume histograms (DVHs) of 198 perturbed plans were calculated. The absolute differences (∆) of the mean dose (Dm) and DVH endpoints Vx and Dy (percentage volume receiving x Gy, and dose covering y% of the volume, respectively) were used to compare the dosimetry of the reference vs perturbed plans. RESULTS: Isocenter shifts in the anterior and lateral directions lead to maximum disagreement between the CTVs dosimetry of perturbed vs reference plans. Isocenter shifts of 10 mm shown a decrease of D95, D98 and Dm of 12.8, 18.0, and 2.9% respectively, for the CTVs. For 5 mm isocenter shifts, these differences decreased to 3.2, 5.2, and 0.9%, respectively, and for 3 mm shifts to 1.0, 1.7, and 0.6%, respectively. For the organs at risk (OARs), only isocenter shifts in the right, posterior and inferior directions worsen the plan dosimetry, nevertheless not negligible lung ∆ V20 of + 2.6%, and heart ∆ V25 of + 1.6% persist for 3 mm shifts. CONCLUSIONS: Inaccuracy in isocenter positioning for VMAT left-sided PMRT irradiation may impact the dosimetry of the CTVs and OARs to a different extent, depending on the directions and magnitude of the perturbation. The acquired information could be useful for planning strategies to guarantee the accuracy of the treatment delivered.

Evaluation of interfraction setup variations for postmastectomy radiation therapy using EPID-based in vivo dosimetry.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy is technically difficult and can be considered one of the most complex techniques concerning patient setup reproducibility. Slight patient setup variations - particularly when high-conformal treatment techniques are used - can adversely affect the accuracy of the delivered dose and the patient outcome. This research aims to investigate the inter-fraction setup variations occurring in two different scenarios of clinical practice: at the reference and at the current patient setups, when an image-guided system is used or not used, respectively. The results were used with the secondary aim of assessing the robustness of the patient setup procedure in use. Forty eight patients treated with volumetric modulated arc and intensity modulated therapies were included in this study. EPID-based in vivo dosimetry (IVD) was performed at the reference setup concomitantly with the weekly cone beam computed tomography acquisition and during the daily current setup. Three indices were analyzed: the ratio R between the reconstructed and planned isocenter doses, γ % and the mean value of γ from a transit dosimetry based on a two-dimensional γ -analysis of the electronic portal images using 5% and 5 mm as dose difference and distance to agreement gamma criteria; they were considered in tolerance if R was within 5%, γ % > 90% and γ mean  < 0.4. One thousand and sixteen EPID-based IVD were analyzed and 6.3% resulted out of the tolerance level. Setup errors represented the main cause of this off tolerance with an occurrence rate of 72.2%. The percentage of results out of tolerance obtained at the current setup was three times greater (9.5% vs 3.1%) than the one obtained at the reference setup, indicating weaknesses in the setup procedure. This study highlights an EPID-based IVD system's utility in the radiotherapy routine as part of the patient's treatment quality controls and to optimize (or confirm) the performed setup procedures' accuracy.

Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Graphical optimization (GO) and inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) are the main treatment planning optimization techniques used in patients undergoing 3D brachytherapy treatment. This study aims to compare the dosimetric difference of plans optimized by GO and IPSA in cervical cancer brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 21 cervical cancer patients data sets consisted of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acquired with the Fletcher applicator in situ were transferred to the Oncentra brachytherapy planning system. For each patient, the treatment plan was initially optimized with GO to reach a maximal D90 tumor dose (6 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions), while keeping the dose to organs at risk (OARs) as low as possible. A second plan was then optimized with IPSA on the same CT images and data set (i.e., contours, catheters, and location of dwell points). Targets and OARs dose volume histograms and irradiation time were compared; data were analyzed with paired t-test; p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The plans with both optimizations meet the clinical requirements. The mean D90 of the clinical target volume was comparable for GO and IPSA. Similar values (p > 0.05) of target V100, V150, V200, HI, and CI were registered for GO and IPSA optimizations. Bladder and rectum D1cc and D2cc obtained by GO resulted in larger values than those obtained by IPSA (p = 0.002). V75 for bladder and rectum were slightly higher for IPSA, but without statistical difference (p > 0.05). The irradiation time was comparable (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In 3D brachytherapy of cervical cancer, GO and IPSA optimizations do not present a significant difference in target dose coverage; nevertheless, IPSA may reduce the maximum dose to normal tissue when compared with GO.

An automated dose verification software for brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To report an implementation method and the results of independent brachytherapy dose verification software (DVS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The DVS was developed based on Visual C++ and adopted a modular structure design. The DICOM RT files exported from a treatment planning system (TPS) were automatically loaded into the DVS. The DVS used the TG-43 formalism for dose calculation. A total of 15 cervical cancer patients who underwent brachytherapy were retrospectively selected to test the DVS. Dosimetric parameters and γ analysis (0.1 cm, 5%) were used to evaluate the dose differences between the DVS and the TPS. RESULTS: Compared with the TPS dose, the γ pass rates of the dose calculated by the DVS were higher than 98%. For the clinical target volume (CTV), the dosimetric differences were less than 0.63% for D90% and D100%. For the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, the agreement of D0.1cc, D1cc, and D2cc were within a 0.78% level. CONCLUSIONS: With minimal human-computer interactions, the DVS can verify the accuracy of doses calculated by the TPS.

Setup in a clinical workflow and impact on radiotherapy routine of an in vivo dosimetry procedure with an electronic portal imaging device.

High conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy are widely used in overloaded radiotherapy departments. In vivo dosimetric screening is essential in this environment to avoid important dosimetric errors. This work examines the feasibility of introducing in vivo dosimetry (IVD) checks in a radiotherapy routine. The causes of dosimetric disagreements between delivered and planned treatments were identified and corrected during the course of treatment. The efficiency of the corrections performed and the added workload needed for the entire procedure were evaluated. The IVD procedure was based on an electronic portal imaging device. A total of 3682 IVD tests were performed for 147 patients who underwent head and neck, abdomen, pelvis, breast, and thorax radiotherapy treatments. Two types of indices were evaluated and used to determine if the IVD tests were within tolerance levels: the ratio R between the reconstructed and planned isocentre doses and a transit dosimetry based on the γ-analysis of the electronic portal images. The causes of test outside tolerance level were investigated and corrected and IVD test was repeated during subsequent fraction. The time needed for each step of the IVD procedure was registered. Pelvis, abdomen, and head and neck treatments had 10% of tests out of tolerance whereas breast and thorax treatments accounted for up to 25%. The patient setup was the main cause of 90% of the IVD tests out of tolerance and the remaining 10% was due to patient morphological changes. An average time of 42 min per day was sufficient to monitor a daily workload of 60 patients in treatment. This work shows that IVD performed with an electronic portal imaging device is feasible in an overloaded department and enables the timely realignment of the treatment quality indices in order to achieve a patient's final treatment compliant with the one prescribed.

A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of dose calculation is crucial to the quality of treatment planning and, consequently, to the dose delivered to patients undergoing radiation therapy. Current general calculation algorithms such as Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) and Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC) have shortcomings in regard to severe inhomogeneities, particularly in those regions where charged particle equilibrium does not hold. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the PBC and CCC algorithms in lung cancer radiotherapy using Monte Carlo (MC) technology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four treatment plans were designed using Oncentra Masterplan TPS for each patient. Two intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were developed using the PBC and CCC algorithms, and two three-dimensional conformal therapy (3DCRT) plans were developed using the PBC and CCC algorithms. The DICOM-RT files of the treatment plans were exported to the Monte Carlo system to recalculate. The dose distributions of GTV, PTV and ipsilateral lung calculated by the TPS and MC were compared. RESULT: For 3DCRT and IMRT plans, the mean dose differences for GTV between the CCC and MC increased with decreasing of the GTV volume. For IMRT, the mean dose differences were found to be higher than that of 3DCRT. The CCC algorithm overestimated the GTV mean dose by approximately 3% for IMRT. For 3DCRT plans, when the volume of the GTV was greater than 100 cm(3), the mean doses calculated by CCC and MC almost have no difference. PBC shows large deviations from the MC algorithm. For the dose to the ipsilateral lung, the CCC algorithm overestimated the dose to the entire lung, and the PBC algorithm overestimated V20 but underestimated V5; the difference in V10 was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: PBC substantially overestimates the dose to the tumour, but the CCC is similar to the MC simulation. It is recommended that the treatment plans for lung cancer be developed using an advanced dose calculation algorithm other than PBC. MC can accurately calculate the dose distribution in lung cancer and can provide a notably effective tool for benchmarking the performance of other dose calculation algorithms within patients.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.

Reirradiation of patients who were previously treated with radiotherapy is vastly challenging. Pulsed low-dose rate (PLDR) external beam radiotherapy has the potential to reduce normal tissue toxicities while providing significant tumor control for recurrent cancers. This work investigates treatment planning techniques for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-based PLDR treatment of various sites, including cases with pancreatic and prostate cancer. A total of 20 patients with clinical recurrence were selected for this study, including 10 cases with pancreatic cancer and 10 with prostate cancer. Large variations in the target volume were included to test the ability of IMRT using the existing treatment planning system and optimization algorithm to deliver uniform doses in individual gantry angles/fields for PLDR treatments. Treatment plans were generated with 10 gantry angles using the step-and-shoot IMRT delivery technique, which can be delivered in 3-minute intervals to achieve an effective low dose rate of 6.7cGy/min. Instead of dose constraints on critical structures, ring structures were mainly used in PLDR-IMRT optimization. In this study, the PLDR-IMRT plans were compared with the PLDR-3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) plans and the PLDR-RapidArc plans. For the 10 cases with pancreatic cancer that were investigated, the mean planning target volume (PTV) dose for each gantry angle in the PLDR-IMRT plans ranged from 17.6 to 22.4cGy. The maximum doses ranged between 22.9 and 34.8cGy. The minimum doses ranged from 8.2 to 17.5cGy. For the 10 cases with prostate cancer that were investigated, the mean PTV doses for individual gantry angles ranged from 18.8 to 22.6cGy. The maximum doses per gantry angle were between 24.0 and 34.7cGy. The minimum doses per gantry angle ranged from 4.4 to 17.4cGy. A significant reduction in the organ at risk (OAR) dose was observed with the PLDR-IMRT plan when compared with that using the PLDR-3DCRT plan. The volume receiving an 18-Gy (V18) dose for the left and right kidneys was reduced by 10.6% and 12.5%, respectively, for the pancreatic plans. The volume receiving a 45-Gy (V45) dose for the small bowel decreased from 65.3% to 45.5%. For the cases with prostate cancer, the volume receiving a 40-Gy (V40) dose for the bladder and the rectum was reduced significantly by 25.1% and 51.2%, respectively. When compared with the RapidArc technique, the volume receiving a 30-Gy (V30) dose for the left and the right kidneys was lower in the IMRT plans. For most OARs, no significant differences were observed between the PLDR-IMRT and the PLDR-RapidArc plans. These results clearly demonstrated that the PLDR-IMRT plan was suitable for PLDR pancreatic and prostate cancer treatments in terms of the overall plan quality. A significant reduction in the OAR dose was achieved with the PLDR-IMRT plan when compared with that using the PLDR-3DCRT plan. For most OARs, no significant differences were observed between the PLDR-IMRT and the PLDR-RapidArc plans. When compared with the PLDR-3DCRT plan, the PLDR-IMRT plan could provide superior target coverage and normal tissue sparing for PLDR reirradiation of recurrent pancreatic and prostate cancers. The PLDR-IMRT plan is an effective treatment choice for recurrent cancers in most cancer centers.

Optimization strategies for pulsed low-dose-rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers.

Pulsed low-dose-rate radiotherapy (PLDR) has been proven to be a valid method of reirradiation. Previous studies of recurrent cancer radiotherapy were mainly based on conventional 3D CRT and VMAT delivery techniques. There are difficulties in IMRT planning using existing commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) to meet the PLDR protocol. This work focuses on PLDR using ten-field IMRT and a commercial TPS for two specific sites: recurrent lung cancers and head and neck cancers. Our PLDR protocol requires that the maximum dose to the PTV be less than 0.4 Gy and the mean dose to be 0.2 Gy per field. We investigated various planning strategies to meet the PLDR requirements for 20 lung and head and neck patients. The PTV volume for lung cases ranged from 101.7 to 919.4 cm3 and the maximum dose to the PTV ranged from 0.22 to 0.39 Gy. The PTV volume for head and neck cases ranged from 66.2 to 282.1 cm3 and the maximum dose to the PTV ranged from 0.21 to 0.39 Gy. With special beam arrangements and dosimetry parameters, it is feasible to use a commercial TPS to generate quality PLDR IMRT plans for lung and head and neck reirradiation.

Investigation of pulsed IMRT and VMAT for re-irradiation treatments: dosimetric and delivery feasibilities.

Many tumor cells demonstrate hyperradiosensitivity at doses below ~50 cGy. Together with the increased normal tissue repair under low dose rate, the pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR), which separates a daily fractional dose of 200 cGy into 10 pulses with 3 min interval between pulses (~20 cGy/pulse and effective dose rate 6.7 cGy min−1), potentially reduces late normal tissue toxicity while still providing significant tumor control for re-irradiation treatments. This work investigates the dosimetric and technical feasibilities of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based PLDR treatments using Varian Linacs. Twenty one cases (12 real re-irradiation cases) including treatment sites of pancreas, prostate, pelvis, lung, head-and-neck, and breast were recruited for this study. The lowest machine operation dose rate (100 MU min−1) was employed in the plan delivery. Ten-field step-and-shoot IMRT and dual-arc VMAT plans were generated using the Eclipse TPS with routine planning strategies. The dual-arc plans were delivered five times to achieve a 200 cGy daily dose (~20 cGy arc−1). The resulting plan quality was evaluated according to the heterogeneity and conformity indexes (HI and CI) of the planning target volume (PTV). The dosimetric feasibility of retaining the hyperradiosensitivity for PLDR was assessed based on the minimum and maximum dose in the target volume from each pulse. The delivery accuracy of VMAT and IMRT at the 100 MU min−1 machine operation dose rate was verified using a 2D diode array and ion chamber measurements. The delivery reproducibility was further investigated by analyzing the Dynalog files of repeated deliveries. A comparable plan quality was achieved by the IMRT (CI 1.10­1.38; HI 1.04­1.10) and the VMAT (CI 1.08­1.26; HI 1.05­1.10) techniques. The minimum/maximum PTV dose per pulse is 7.9 ± 5.1 cGy/33.7 ± 6.9 cGy for the IMRT and 12.3 ± 4.1 cGy/29.2 ± 4.7 cGy for the VMAT. Six out of the 186 IMRT pulses (fields) were found to exceed 50 cGy maximum PTV dose per pulse while the maximum PTV dose per pulse was within 40 cGy for all the VMAT pulses (arcs). However, for VMAT plans, the dosimetric quality of the entire treatment plan was less superior for the breast cases and large irregular targets. The gamma passing rates for both techniques at the 100 MU min−1 dose rate were at least 94.1% (3%/3 mm) and the point dose measurements agreed with the planned values to within 2.2%. The average root mean square error of the leaf position was 0.93 ± 0.83 mm for IMRT and 0.53 ± 0.48 mm for VMAT based on the Dynalog file analysis. The RMS error of the leaf position was nearly identical for the repeated deliveries of the same plans. In general, both techniques are feasible for PLDR treatments. VMAT was more advantageous for PLDR with more uniform target dose per pulse, especially for centrally located tumors. However, for large, irregular and/or peripheral tumors, IMRT could produce more favorable PLDR plans. By taking the biological benefit of PLDR delivery and the dosimetric benefit of IMRT and VMAT, the proposed methods have a great potential for those previously-irradiated recurrent patients.