Decreased Prognostic Value of International Prognostic Score in Chinese Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated in the Contemporary Era.

BACKGROUND: The International Prognostic Score (IPS) was developed based on the data of Western advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated before 1992. Only a few studies ever evaluated the application value of IPS in Chinese population or in patients treated in the contemporary era whose outcomes has improved significantly than before. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving 208 previously untreated Chinese advanced HL patients, who were admitted to Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1, 1999 to April 30, 2015 and received uniform first-line treatment. The prognostic value of both IPS and the seven IPS factors for freedom-from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in this population. The statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier methodology, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 79 months (range, 15-210 months), the 5-year FFP and OS were 78.8% and 86.0% respectively, which improved obviously compared with the original IPS study. The IPS remained prognostic for both FFP (P = 0.041) and OS (P = 0.013), but the range narrowed obviously, with 5-year FFP ranging from 87.2% to 61.5%, 5-year OS ranging from 94.1% to 69.2%, and the separation of survival curves was not as good as before. Only two of the seven IPS factors showed a significant independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis: Stage IV (for FFP, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.219, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.148-3.948, P = 0.016; for OS, HR = 2.491, 95% CI: 1.159-5.355, P = 0.019) and hemoglobin <105 g/L (for FFP, HR = 2.136, 95% CI: 1.123-4.060, P = 0.021; for OS, HR = 2.345, 95% CI: 1.099-5.042, P = 0.028). A simple prognostic score calculated by adding one point each for any of the two factors was prognostic both for FFP (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) with the survival curves separating very well, but the range still narrowed. CONCLUSIONS: The IPS has decreased the prognostic value in Chinese advanced HL patients treated in the contemporary era. More prognostic factors are needed to supplement this original scoring system so as to identify different risk populations more accurately.

Prognostic value of pretreatment serum beta-2 microglobulin level in advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the modern era.

The prognostic value of pretreatment serum beta-2 microglobulin (B2MG) level in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated in the modern era has not been well established. We conducted a retrospective study involving 202 advanced classical HL (cHL) patients treated from 1998.5 to 2015.7 to evaluate the impact of serum B2MG level on prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that serum B2MG level ≥ 2.5 mg/L was an independent predictor for freedom from progression (FFP) (P = 0.001), lymphoma-specific survival (P = 0.030) and overall survival (P = 0.034). The 5-year FFP of patients with serum B2MG level ≥ 2.5 mg/L was 66.8%, compared with 89.7% in patients with B2MG level < 2.5 mg/L (P < 0.001). The traditionally used International Prognostic Score (IPS) remained prognostic for FFP (P = 0.013) but the predictive range narrowed, with 5-year FFP ranging from 90.9% to 62.3%. The 5-year FFP of the 44 patients with both IPS ≥ 3 and serum B2MG ≥ 2.5 mg/L was 50.7%, which was significantly worse than that of the 87 patients with only one of the two factors (81.9%, P < 0.001) or the 71 patients with both B2MG < 2.5 mg/L and IPS < 3 (91.1%, P < 0.001). The difference of FFP between the latter two groups was smaller but also significant (P = 0.038). In summary, our data suggest pretreatment serum B2MG level ≥ 2.5 mg/L was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in advanced cHL patients treated in the modern era. It improves IPS in predicting the outcomes as the combination of IPS and B2MG indentified a wider prognostic range than IPS alone with a sizable number of patients in different risk groups.

[Infection status and prognostic significance analysis of Epstein-Barr virus in 207 cases with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Epstein Barr virus (EBV) positive rate in untreated Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and investigate the prognostic significance of EBV status. METHODS: A total of 207 previously untreated patients with histologically confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma were enrolled in the study. The EBV infection status was confirmed through examining EBV-RNA (EBER) or EBV latent membrane protein-1. The correlation of clinical features and EBV infection status was analyzed, also the prognostic significance of EBV infection. RESULTS: A total of 66 cases were confirmed to be EBV positive Hodgkin's lymphoma (EBV⁺ HL) in all 207 cases, accounting for 31.9%. EBV⁺ HL group had more male patients (46/66, 69.7%) and mixed cellularity subtype (34/66, 51.5%) than EBV negative Hodgkin's lymphoma (EBV⁻ HL) group. The EBV positive rate had two peaks in age, respectively, in the age of 0-15 yeaR-old and >60 yeaR-old. During a median follow-up period of 35 months, EBV⁻ HL was significant better than EBV⁺ HL in overall survival (P=0.001), but no significant difference was found in progression-free survival (P=0.763). CONCLUSION: EBV positive is a poor prognostic factor for overall survival time in HL.

Addition of rituximab is not associated with survival benefit compared with CHOP alone for patients with stage I diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The role of rituximab in combination with CHOP regimen in patients with stage I diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains to be defined. We aimed to compare CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) with CHOP alone and determine the value of radiotherapy in these patients. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2009, 140 untreated patients with stage I DLBCL were retrospectively analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were treated in R-CHOP group and 62 in CHOP group. Ninety-one patients received additional radiotherapy at the end of chemotherapy. The different treatment groups were well-balanced with respect to baseline characteristics. Complete response (CR) rate was 77% both in R-CHOP and CHOP groups (P=0.945). After a median follow-up period of 56 months, patients received R-CHOP regimen had similar 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (76% vs. 85%; log-rank P=0.215) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (90% vs. 96%; log-rank P=0.175) compared with those with CHOP alone. Patients with radiotherapy had significantly increased 5-year PFS compared with those who had chemotherapy alone (86% vs. 71%; log-rank P=0.005). At multivariate analysis, patients who had CR (P=0.008) and received radiotherapy (P=0.003) were significantly associated with superior PFS. CONCLUSIONS: CHOP alone could be as effective as R-CHOP regimen and additional radiotherapy would be necessary for stage I or stage I non-bulky DLBCL patients.

[A analysis of the outcome and prognostic factors in 415 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of treatment, survival and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: A total of previously untreated 415 patients with histologically confirmed Hodgkin lymphoma admitted in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from February 1999 to February 2011 were included in this study. Their short-term and long-term survivals, as well as prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: For the whole group, 371 cases (89.4%) had complete remission (CR), 33 cases (8.0%) had partial remission (PR) and 11 cases (2.7%) experienced disease progression. The CR rates for stage I, II, III and IV patients were 96.6% (56/58), 92.0% (219/238), 83.6% (51/61) and 77.6% (45/58), respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 90.6%, 84.1% and 92.5%. The stage I-II patients were significantly better than stage III-IV patients in terms of 5-year DFS rate (94.5% vs. 79.2%, P < 0.001), 5-year PFS rate (91.2% vs. 66.4%, P < 0.001) and 5-year OS rate (97.0% vs. 81.5%, P < 0.001). For stage I-II patients, combined modality therapy was related to better DFS, PFS and OS as compared with radiotherapy alone, and was associated with a better PFS compared with chemotherapy alone. There was a trend that consolidative radiotherapy could improve the long-term survival for stage III-IV patients who achieved disease remission after chemotherapy. What's more, consolidative radiotherapy could significantly improve PFS for those stage II-IV patients who achieved PR after chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that clinical stage and pathological type were independent prognostic factors for the 5-year DFS rate (both P < 0.05), and the stage, elevated serum ß2-microglobulin and none-ABVD/BEACOP chemotherapy regimen were independent prognostic factors for 5-year PFS rate and 5-year overall survival rate (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HL treated in China have a good prognosis. Combined modality therapy is the preferred treatment for stage I-II patients. Consolidative radiotherapy is recommended to those of stage III-IV patients who experienced PR after chemotherapy. Stage, serum ß2-microglobulin and first-line chemotherapy regimen significantly affect the prognosis for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Comparison of dose-dense ABVD and standard ABVD in the treatment of early unfavorable and advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.

This retrospective analysis compared standard regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) with the dose-dense ABVD regimen (ABVD-21) in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Patients who had early-stage unfavorable or advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) according to German Hodgkin Study Group criteria from March 1999 to February 2011 were analyzed for treatment response, long-term survival and hematological toxicity. There were 85 patients in the ABVD-21 group and 118 patients in the ABVD group respectively. The complete remission rates after completion of treatment were 92.9% and 90.7% for ABVD-21 and ABVD, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 62 months, no significant difference was found in projected 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (84.7% and 94.1% respectively for ABVD-21; 81.4% and 91.5% for ABVD). Subgroup analyses showed that ABVD-21 was significantly better than ABVD for patients with IPS≥3 in terms of PFS and OS rates. Grade 3 to 4 leukopenia (51.8% vs. 28.8%, P=0.001) and neutropenia (57.6% vs. 39.0%, P=0.009) were more common with ABVD-21. We were led to conclude that dose-dense ABVD did not result in better tumor control and overall survival than did ABVD for early-stage unfavorable HL. However, patients at high risk, for example, with IPS≥3, may benefit from dose-dense ABVD.