Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 137(11): 1558-67, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19327197

ABSTRACT

We investigated the percentage of dogs that could be vaccinated against rabies by conducting a pilot campaign in N'Djaména, Chad. Owners were charged US$4.13 per dog vaccinated, and 24% of all dogs in the three city districts covered by the campaign were vaccinated. Total campaign costs were US$7623, resulting in an average of US$19.40 per vaccinated dog. This is five times more expensive than the cost per animal vaccinated during a previous free vaccination campaign for dog-owners, conducted in the same districts. The free campaign, which vaccinated 2605 more dogs than this campaign, cost an additional US$1.45 per extra dog vaccinated. Campaigns in which owners are charged for vaccinations result in lower vaccination rates than in free campaigns. Public health officials can use these results when evaluating the costs and benefits of subsidizing dog rabies vaccination programmes.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Mass Vaccination/veterinary , Rabies Vaccines/economics , Rabies/veterinary , Animals , Cat Diseases/economics , Cat Diseases/prevention & control , Cats , Chad , Developing Countries , Dog Diseases/economics , Dogs , Fees and Charges , Female , Haplorhini , Humans , Male , Mass Vaccination/economics , Monkey Diseases/economics , Monkey Diseases/prevention & control , Rabies/economics , Rabies/prevention & control
2.
Bull World Health Organ ; 81(10): 739-44, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14758434

ABSTRACT

Canine rabies, and thus human exposure to rabies, can be controlled through mass vaccination of the animal reservoir if dog owners are willing to cooperate. Inaccessible, ownerless dogs, however, reduce the vaccination coverage achieved in parenteral campaigns. This study aimed to estimate the vaccination coverage in dogs in three study zones of N'Djaména, Chad, after a pilot free parenteral mass vaccination campaign against rabies. We used a capture-mark-recapture approach for population estimates, with a Bayesian, Markov chain, Monte Carlo method to estimate the total number of owned dogs, and the ratio of ownerless to owned dogs to calculate vaccination coverage. When we took into account ownerless dogs, the vaccination coverage in the dog populations was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI), 84-89%) in study zone I, 71% (95% CI, 64-76%) in zone II, and 64% (95% CI, 58-71%) in zone III. The proportions of ownerless dogs to owned dogs were 1.1% (95% CI, 0-3.1%), 7.6% (95% CI, 0.7-16.5%), and 10.6% (95% CI, 1.6-19.1%) in the three study zones, respectively. Vaccination coverage in the three populations of owned dogs was 88% (95% CI, 84-92%) in zone I, 76% (95% CI, 71-81%) in zone II, and 70% (95% CI, 66-76%) in zone III. Participation of dog owners in the free campaign was high, and the number of inaccessible ownerless dogs was low. High levels of vaccination coverage could be achieved with parenteral mass vaccination. Regular parenteral vaccination campaigns to cover all of N'Djaména should be considered as an ethical way of preventing human rabies when post-exposure treatment is of limited availability and high in cost.


Subject(s)
Dogs/immunology , Mass Vaccination/methods , Rabies Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rabies/prevention & control , Animals , Animals, Domestic , Bayes Theorem , Chad , Community Participation , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Ownership , Pilot Projects , Rabies/veterinary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL