Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster administered by intradermal or intramuscular route in Thai older adults

IntroductionIntradermal (ID) vaccination may alleviate COVID-19 vaccine shortages and vaccine hesitancy due to systemic reactogenicity among older adults. ObjectivesTo compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of fractional ID and standard intramuscular (IM) booster vaccination of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines in older adults. MethodsParticipants aged [≥]65 years who previously vaccinated with 2-dose ChAdOx1 were randomized to receive one of the four booster vaccinations: 0.1mL ID mRNA-1273, 0.5mL IM mRNA-1273, 0.1mL ID BNT162b2 and 0.3mL IM BNT162b2. Immunogenicity as measured by anti-receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) IgG against Wuhan, neutralising antibody (NAb) against Wuhan and Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.4/5, and IFN{gamma}-producing cells. Local and systemic adverse effects (AEs) were self-reported via an electronic diary card. ResultsOf the 210 participants enrolled, 70.5% were female and median age was 77.5 years (interquartile range (IQR): 71.0-84.0). Following the booster dose, both ID vaccination induced 37% lower levels of anti-RBD IgG than IM vaccination of the same vaccine. NAb against ancestral and Omicron BA.1 strains was highest following IM mRNA-1273 (1,718 and 617), followed by ID mRNA-1273 (1,212 and 318), IM BNT162b2 (713 and 230), and ID BNT162b2 (587 and 148), respectively. Spike-specific IFN{gamma} responses were similar or higher in the ID groups when compared with their respective IM groups. Vaccine delivery through ID route tended to have lower systemic AEs, although more local AEs reported in ID mRNA-1273 group. ConclusionsFractional ID vaccination induced immunogenicity and reactogenicity comparable to IM and may be an alternative option for older people. Key pointsO_LIFractional dose intradermal mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination induces robust immunogenicity in adults aged [≥]65 years. C_LIO_LIFor each vaccine, intradermal route induced lower humoral but similar or higher cellular immune responses than IM route. C_LIO_LIIntradermal mRNA-1273 vaccination induced similar immunogenicity to intramuscular BNT162b2 vaccination. C_LIO_LIImmune responses were marginally lower among participants aged [≥]80 years than among participants aged 65-79 years. C_LIO_LISystemic reaction was lower following intradermal mRNA COVID-19 vaccination compared with intramuscular vaccination. C_LI

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults.

We evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous COVID-19 primary series vaccination schedules. Participants were randomized to one of seven groups that received two-dose homologous BNT162b2 or heterologous combinations of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2, with 4 weeks interval. Of 210 participants, median age was 38 (19-60) years, 51% were female. The groups that received BNT162b2 as second dose induced the highest virus-specific IgG response against the ancestral strain [BNT162b2: geometric mean concentration (GMC) 2133-2249, 95%CI 1558 to 3055; ChAdOx1: 851-1201, 95%CI 649 to 1522; CoronaVac: 137-225, 95%CI 103-286 BAU/mL], neutralising antibodies (NAb) against Beta and Delta, and interferon gamma response. All groups induced low to negligible NAb against Omicron. A BNT162b2 booster (3rd dose) following heterologous CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 regimens induced >140-fold increase in NAb titres against Omicron. Our findings indicate that heterologous regimens using BNT162b2 as the second dose may be considered an alternative schedule to maximize immune response.

The immunogenicity and safety of different COVID-19 booster vaccination following CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary series

The CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech) and ChAdOx1(Oxford-AstraZeneca) are two widely used COVID-19 vaccines. We examined the immunogenicity of four COVID-19 booster vaccine: BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm Biotech), ChAdOx1, 30g-BNT162b2 and 15g-BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), in healthy adults who received a two-dose CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 8-12 weeks earlier. Among the 352 participants (179 CoronaVac and 173 ChAdOx1 participants), 285 (81%) were female, and median age was 39(IQR: 31-47) years. 98%(175/179) and 99%(172/173) of Coronavac and ChAdOx1 participants remained seropositive at baseline. Two weeks post-booster, both 30g- and 15g-BNT162b2 induced the highest anti-RBD IgG concentration (BAU/mL); Coronavac-prime: 30g-BNT162b2, 5152.2(95%CI 4491.7-5909.8); 15g-BNT162b2, 3981.1(3397.2-4665.4); ChAdOx1, 1358.0(1141.8-1615.1); BBIBP-CorV, 154.6(92.11-259.47); ChAdOx1-prime: 30g-BNT162b2, 2363.8(2005.6-2786.1; 15g-BNT162b2, 1961.9(1624.6-2369.1); ChAdOx1, 246.4(199.6-304.2); BBIBP-CorV, 128.1(93.5-175.4). Similarly, both 30g- and 15g-BNT162b2 boosting induced the highest neutralizing antibodies (nAb) titres against all variants and highest T-cell response evaluated by interferon gamma released asssays. While all BNT162b2 or heterologous ChAdOx1-boosted participants had nAb against Omicron, these were <50% for BBIBP-CorV and 75% for homologous ChAdOx1-boosted participants. There was significant decrease in nAb (>4-fold) 16-20 weeks post booster. Heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 following CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 primary series is most immunogenic. A lower dose BNT162b2 may be considered as booster in settings with limited vaccine supply.

Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine

BackgroundResponding to SARS-CoV-2 Delta variants escaped the vaccine-induced immunity and waning immunity from the inactivated whole virus vaccine, Thailand recently proposed a heterologous inactivated whole virus vaccine (CoronaVac) viral vector vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) prime-boost vaccine regimen(I/V). This study aims to evaluate the immunogenicity and adverse events of this regimen by comparison with homologous CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and convalescent serum. MethodImmunogenicity was evaluated by the level of IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S1 subunit) (anti-S RBD). At 2 weeks following the second dosage, a selection of random samples was tested for plaque reduction neutralisation (PRNT) and Pseudotype-Based Microneutralization test (PVNT) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs). The safety profile of heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 prime-boost vaccine regimen was described by interviewing at the 1-month visit. ResultBetween April to August 2021,426 participants were included in the study, with 155 obtaining CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(I/V),32 obtaining homologous CoronaVac(I/I),47 obtaining homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(V/V),169 with history covid-19 infection. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of anti-S RBD level in the I/V group compare 2wks and 4 wks (873.9 vs 639,p=0.00114).At 4 wks, GMTs of anti-S RBD level in I/V group was 639, 95% CI 63-726,and natural infection group 177.3, 95% CI 42-221, and V/V group 211.1, 95% CI 77-152, and I/I group 108.2, 95% CI 77-152; all p<0.001).At 2 wks, The GMTs of 50%PRNT of 19 sampling from the I/V group is 434.5, 95% CI 326-579, against wild type and 80.4, 95% CI 56-115, against alpha and 67.4, 95% CI 48-95, against delta and 19.8, 95% CI 14-30, against beta; all p<0.001. At 2 wks, The GMTs of 50%PVNT of 15 sampling from the I/V group is 597.8, 95% CI 368-970, against wild type and 163.9, 95% CI 89-301, against alpha and 157.7, 95% CI 66-378, against delta. The AEs in the I/V schedule were well tolerated and generally unremarkable. ConclusionThe I/V vaccination is a mixed regimen that induced higher immunogenicity and shall be considered for responding to Delta Variants when only inactivated whole virus vaccine and viral vector vaccine was available.