Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Mycobacteriol ; 6(1): 1-8, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28317797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of indeterminate and tuberculoid leprosy is often difficult due to limited and confounding signs and symptoms. In the current study, we evaluated the utility of new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Mycobacterium leprae-specific DNA sequences in the pseudogene regions of ML1545, ML2180, and ML2179 for PCR-based diagnosis of indeterminate leprosy (IND) and leprosy cases across the immunological spectrum. The sensitivity was compared with that of RLEP PCR. METHODS: DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens of 220 leprosy cases, which were divided into IND (41), tuberculoid form (3), borderline tuberculoid (42), midborderline (3), borderline lepromatous (n=59), and lepromatous leprosy (72) cases. PCR positivity of both multiplex and RLEP PCR were compared in all the samples. A decision tree was constructed using the classification and regression trees algorithm to predict the probability of PCR positivity with the new multiplex PCR scheme in various clinical groups of leprosy. Sensitivity of each pseudogene target was determined using real-time PCR assays, and specificity was confirmed by PCR amplification of DNA extracted from three other mycobacterial species and skin biopsies of 44 non-leprosy cases. RESULTS: A multiplex PCR positivity of 75.61% was noted in IND cases when compared to that of 58.54% using RLEP PCR (P < 0.05). Enhanced multiplex PCR positivity was noted across various clinical groups in comparison to RLEP PCR. The decision tree classifier has predicted statistically significant probability for multiplex PCR positivity among RLEP-PCR negative group and clinical groups with a low bacillary load. CONCLUSION: This new multiplex PCR scheme can support the diagnosis of indeterminate and tuberculoid forms of leprosy with limited clinical manifestations and can be implemented in basic clinical/diagnostic setting that possess conventional PCR facilities.


Subject(s)
Leprosy, Lepromatous/diagnosis , Leprosy, Paucibacillary/diagnosis , Leprosy, Tuberculoid/diagnosis , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Mycobacterium leprae/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Biopsy , Child , Child, Preschool , DNA, Bacterial , Decision Trees , Female , Humans , Infant , Leprosy, Lepromatous/microbiology , Leprosy, Paucibacillary/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium leprae/isolation & purification , Pseudogenes/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skin/microbiology , Skin/pathology , Young Adult
2.
Infect Genet Evol ; 45: 285-289, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27642139

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Objective of this study was to identify the strain diversity of Mycobacterium leprae in terms of SNP types and subtypes stratified as per genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms, in clinical isolates of leprosy patients from a tertiary care leprosy center in South India. Further, the associations of SNP types with clinical outcomes in leprosy were also investigated. METHODS: DNA was extracted from excisional skin biopsies of a total of 172 newly diagnosed untreated leprosy patients from a clinic in Tamil Nadu, in south India, that also serves patients from neighboring states. All the leprosy patients were those who voluntarily reported at the clinic during the study period of one year i.e., 2015. Clinical and histopathological details were collected at diagnosis and leprosy was confirmed through bacteriological smear examination and PCR for M. leprae specific RLEP region. SNP types and subtypes were determined by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of PCR products. RESULTS: M. leprae specific RLEP gene amplification was achieved in 160 out of 172 patients. Among 160 specimens 118(73.75%) were type 1 and 42 (26.25%) were type 2 and on subtyping it was noted that 88/160 (55.00%) were 1D, 25/160 (15.62%) 1C, 5/160 (3.12%) 1A, 33/160 (20.62%) 2G and 9/160 (5.62%) were 2H. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that subtype 1D is predominant in the south Indian population. We also noted 2G, 1C and 1A in the patient sample tested. Additionally we identified subtype 2H for the first time in India.


Subject(s)
Genome, Bacterial/genetics , Leprosy/microbiology , Mycobacterium leprae/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Leprosy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Epidemiology , Phylogeography , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...