Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
N C Med J ; 84(6)2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: E-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among US youth and are regularly used on school grounds. We assessed school staff's awareness of students' e-cigarette use, response by schools, and resources needed to address use, and examined e-cigarettes confiscated by school staff in North Carolina to guide prevention and identify needed resources. METHODS: In May 2019, staff from a random sample of 25 of 451 North Carolina public and charter high schools were invited to complete an online survey and semistructured interview; 12 schools consented to ≥ 1 component (survey, N = 514; interviews, N = 35). Staff knowledge and perceptions of students' e-cigarette use and school tobacco policies were assessed, including school efforts to address e-cigarette use. E-cigarette products confiscated by nine schools from students during the 2018-2019 school year were collected. LIMITATIONS: Only 12 public high schools participated, and these schools might not be representative of all North Carolina high schools. Quantitative surveys were not collected from all staff at participating schools; however, the response rate was 62% and included different staff positions and both urban and rural schools. Finally, e-cigarette products collected by schools might not be representative of all devices used by students. RESULTS: Among surveyed staff, 33% observed students using e-cigarettes on school grounds; 86% believed e-cigarette use somewhat or largely contributes to learning disruptions. Overall, 94% of respondents knew their school's policy prohibits student e-cigarette use on school grounds, and 57% were not confident their school has resources to help students quit. From 35 interviews, themes included concern that schools' tobacco-free policies do not deter use and additional resources are needed to address e-cigarette use in schools. Of 336 collected devices, there were different e-cigarette types and most (65%) e-liquid bottles were flavored. CONCLUSION: Efforts are warranted to incorporate evidence-based curricula; educate staff, parents, and youth regarding health risks of e-cigarette use; and help youth quit e-cigarettes.

4.
N C Med J ; 81(6): 377-380, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33139469

ABSTRACT

The passage of the Affordable Care Act had a great impact on the landscape of public health programming and clinical preventive care in North Carolina. Large funding measures have supported community-based prevention efforts and led to policy, systems, and environmental changes to support a healthier population.


Subject(s)
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Public Health , Anniversaries and Special Events , Humans , North Carolina , United States
7.
N C Med J ; 79(4): 235-239, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991615

ABSTRACT

In North Carolina, our public health infrastructure consists of a state health department and 85 local health departments representing all 100 counties. The state health department, local health departments, health systems, and clinical providers work literally and figuratively as a team to improve the health of our citizens. In this article, we provide examples of the critical role of public health practitioners as part of the broader team addressing health, specifically in the areas of chronic disease, communicable disease, oral health, environmental health, and maternal and child health.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Public Health , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Dental Health Services/organization & administration , Humans , Maternal-Child Health Services/organization & administration , North Carolina
8.
N C Med J ; 79(3): 157-162, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735617

ABSTRACT

Like many states, North Carolina faces an opioid crisis that has rapidly intensified in recent years. Addressing this epidemic requires interventions such as judicious prescribing of opioids, community based prevention efforts, broader naloxone distribution, law enforcement efforts to curb drug trafficking, and harm reduction efforts like safe syringe programs. Expanding access to treatment and recovery services, as well as affordable health insurance for individuals with substance use disorder or at risk for developing a disorder, is also critical. North Carolina has made significant progress, but we have much more work to do.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Epidemics , Harm Reduction , Health Services Accessibility , Law Enforcement , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/poisoning , Drug Overdose/etiology , Drug Trafficking , Humans , Insurance, Health , Needle-Exchange Programs , North Carolina/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation
9.
N C Med J ; 79(2): 95-98, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29563302

ABSTRACT

In working to improve the health of North Carolinians, a broader emphasis has been placed on determinants of health, or non-medical drivers of health. Critical examples of health determinants are adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs, that affect early brain development and lifelong health and function. Multiple organizations and communities have come together to acknowledge the importance of prevention, address toxic stress and trauma in childhood, promote resiliency and trauma-informed care, and invest in the future of North Carolina through its children. This issue of the NCMJ highlights the prevalence and magnitude of ACEs in North Carolina and the effects on our children and the impact into adulthood, and how people and communities can come together to improve public health over the life course by addressing ACEs.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Child Health , Child Welfare , Public Health , Child , Child Abuse/prevention & control , Child Abuse/psychology , Child Abuse/rehabilitation , Humans , North Carolina
10.
J Urban Health ; 92(2): 291-303, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25670210

ABSTRACT

Secondhand smoke exposure is a concern in multiunit housing, where smoke can migrate between apartments. In 2012, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene conducted a cross-sectional mail and phone survey among a random sample of low-income and market-rate multiunit housing owners and managers in NYC. The study compared experiences and attitudes regarding smoke-free policies between owners/managers (owners) with and without low-income units. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the correlates of smoke-free residential unit rules and interest in adopting new smoke-free rules. Perceived benefits and challenges of implementing smoke-free rules were also examined. Overall, one-third of owners prohibited smoking in individual units. Among owners, nearly one-third owned or managed buildings with designated certified low-income units. Owners with low-income units were less likely than those without to have a smoke-free unit policy (26 vs. 36 %, p < 0.01) or be aware that owners can legally adopt smoke-free building policies (60 vs. 70 %, p < 0.01). In the final model, owners who believed that owners could legally adopt smoke-free policies were more likely to have a smoke-free unit policy, while current smokers and owners of larger buildings were less likely to have a policy. Nearly three quarters of owners without smoke-free units were interested in prohibiting smoking in all of their building/units (73 %). Among owners, correlates of interest in prohibiting smoking included awareness that secondhand smoke is a health issue and knowledge of their legal rights to prohibit smoking in their buildings. Current smokers were less likely to be interested in future smoke-free policies. Educational programs promoting awareness of owners' legal right to adopt smoke-free policies in residential buildings may improve the availability of smoke-free multiunit housing.


Subject(s)
Housing/statistics & numerical data , Smoke-Free Policy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , New York City , Public Housing/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Urban Health
11.
Am J Public Health ; 105(4): e61-4, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25713971

ABSTRACT

Studies have linked the consumption of sugary drinks to weight gain, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Since 2006, New York City has taken several actions to reduce consumption. Nutrition standards limited sugary drinks served by city agencies. Mass media campaigns educated New Yorkers on the added sugars in sugary drinks and their health impact. Policy proposals included an excise tax, a restriction on use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, and a cap on sugary drink portion sizes in food service establishments. These initiatives were accompanied by a 35% decrease in the number of New York City adults consuming one or more sugary drinks a day and a 27% decrease in public high school students doing so from 2007 to 2013.


Subject(s)
Beverages , Carbohydrates , Health Education/organization & administration , Nutrition Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Assistance/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Mass Media , New York City , Social Marketing , Taxes
12.
Prev Med Rep ; 2: 488-91, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26844107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the recent trends in youth smoking behaviors, and examine cigar and smokeless tobacco use patterns among youth smokers in New York City. METHODS: Data, analyzed in 2014, were from the New York City Youth Risk Behavior Survey, a cross-sectional survey conducted bi-annually since 1997 in a representative sample of New York City public high school students (2001-2013), n = 59,122. RESULTS: Cigarette smoking declined 53%, from 17.6% in 2001 to 8.2% in 2013 (p < 0.001). The proportion of cigar use among smokers doubled, from 22.2% in 2001 to 45.9% in 2013 (p < 0.001), while the proportion of smokeless tobacco use among smokers increased by 400% between 2001 and 2013 (4.2% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Youth cigarette smoking rates in New York City decreased, while cigar smoking and smokeless tobacco use among smokers increased considerably. These data highlight trends in youth smoking behaviors within the context of New York City's comprehensive tobacco control program and stress the need for additional activity to spur further declines in cigarette smoking and reverse the trends in cigar and smokeless tobacco use among New York City youth. Results demonstrate the need for continuous surveillance and action by the public health community to counteract tobacco industry promotion of other products.

13.
Tob Control ; 24(e1): e10-3, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24365700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While tobacco taxes and smoke-free air regulations have significantly decreased tobacco use, tobacco-related illness accounts for hundreds of thousands of annual deaths. Experts are considering additional strategies to further reduce tobacco consumption. METHODS: We investigated smokers' (n=2118) and non-smokers' (n=2210) opinions on existing and theoretical strategies, including tax and retailer-based strategies in New York City, across three cross-sectional surveys. RESULTS: Compared with smokers, non-smokers were significantly more likely (p<0.05) to favour all tobacco control strategies. Overall, 25% of smokers surveyed favoured increasing taxes on cigarettes, climbing to 60% if taxes were used to fund healthcare programmes. Among non-smokers, 72% favoured raising taxes, increasing to 83% if taxes were used to fund healthcare programmes. 54% of non-smoking New Yorkers favoured limiting the number of tobacco retail licences, as did 30% of smokers. The most popular retail-based strategies were raising the minimum age to purchase cigarettes from 18 to 21, with 60% of smokers and 69% of non-smokers in favour, and prohibiting retailers near schools from selling tobacco, with 51% of smokers and 69% of non-smokers in favour. Keeping tobacco products out of customers' view, prohibiting tobacco companies from paying retailers to display or advertise tobacco products and prohibiting price promotions were favoured by more than half of non-smokers surveyed, and almost half of smokers. CONCLUSIONS: While the support level varied between smokers and non-smokers, price and retail-based tobacco control strategies were consistently supported by the public, providing useful information for jurisdictions examining emerging tobacco control strategies.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Commerce , Public Opinion , Smoking Prevention , Taxes , Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products/economics , Age Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , New York City , Public Policy , Schools , Smoking/economics , Smoking Cessation , Nicotiana , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Use Disorder/prevention & control
14.
Tob Control ; 24(5): 497-500, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24789607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2011, New York City (NYC) parks and beaches became smoke-free. There is currently little research evaluating the impact of such laws on smoking behaviour at the population level. METHODS: We used an interrupted time-series study design to analyse data from the New York State Adult Tobacco Survey to assess the law's impact using the rest of New York State as a comparison. Trends in how frequently respondents noticed people smoking in parks and beaches were analysed between the third quarter of 2009 and the fourth quarter of 2012, comparing NYC to the rest of the state. RESULTS: The trend in the frequency of NYC residents noticing people smoking in local parks and beaches decreased significantly over the six quarters after the law took effect. There was no comparable decline among residents in the rest of the state. An increase in the number of respondents who never noticed people smoking in NYC contributed to this decline. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with previous studies and provide population-level evidence that suggest the law has reduced smoking in parks and on beaches.


Subject(s)
Smoke-Free Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bathing Beaches/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Parks, Recreational/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
15.
Tob Control ; 24(4): 362-8, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24610054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Light smokers represent an increasing share of adult smokers in various parts of the world including New York City (NYC). Since 2007, the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has aired hard-hitting antitobacco media campaigns paired with time-limited nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) giveaways. We evaluated an original antitobacco media campaign, developed to increase awareness of smoking risks and encourage cessation service use among light smokers in NYC. METHODS: We compared cessation service request volume during the campaign to historical periods without ads targeting light smokers. We used a cross-sectional online panel survey to assess the ad's perceived effectiveness and its impact on learning something new, quit intentions and concern for smoking-related health risks among non-daily, light daily and heavy daily smokers. RESULTS: The proportion of light smokers among smokers requesting cessation services increased 50% (from 13% to 20%) relative to previous time-limited NRT giveaways. Compared to heavy daily smokers, non-daily (aOR: 1.95, p<0.05) and light daily (aOR: 2.27, p<0.05) smokers were more likely to express increased concern about smoking-related health risks after viewing the ad. Perceived effectiveness of the ad did not differ by smoker type. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that light smokers were receptive to a targeted antitobacco message encouraging use of cessation services. The campaign appears to have been particularly effective in increasing smoking-related health concerns in this group. The lack of difference in perceived ad effectiveness by smoker type suggests the potential to develop such ads without sacrificing broad impact.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mass Media , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Young Adult
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(41): 921-4, 2014 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25321069

ABSTRACT

Quitting smoking substantially reduces smokers' risk for smoking-related morbidity and mortality and can increase life expectancy by up to a decade. Most smokers want to quit and make at least one medical provider visit annually. Health care providers can play an important role in helping smokers quit by documenting patients' tobacco use, advising smokers to quit, and providing evidence-based cessation treatments or referrals for treatment, but many providers and practices do not regularly take these actions. Systems to increase provider screening and delivery of cessation interventions are available; in particular, electronic health records (EHRs) can be powerful tools to facilitate increased cessation interventions. This analysis reports on an EHR-based pay-for-improvement initiative in 19 community health centers (CHCs) in New York City (NYC) that sought to increase smoking status documentation and cessation interventions. At the end of the initiative, the mean proportion of patients who were documented as smokers in CHCs had increased from 24% to 27%, whereas the mean proportion of documented smokers who received a cessation intervention had increased from 23% to 54%. Public health programs and health systems should consider implementing strategies to equip and train clinical providers to use information technology to increase delivery of cessation interventions.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation , Smoking Prevention , Adult , Community Health Centers , Feedback , Humans , New York City , Quality Improvement
18.
Public Health Nutr ; 17(11): 2484-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To contrast mean values of Na:K with Na and K mean intakes by demographic factors, and to calculate the prevalence of New York City (NYC) adults meeting the WHO guideline for optimal Na:K (<1 mmol/mmol, i.e. <0·59 mg/mg) using 24 h urinary values. DESIGN: Data were from the 2010 Community Health Survey Heart Follow-Up Study, a population-based, representative study including data from 24 h urine collections. SETTING: Participants were interviewed using a dual-frame sample design consisting of random-digit dial telephone exchanges that cover NYC. Data were weighted to be representative of NYC adults as a whole. SUBJECTS: The final sample of 1656 adults provided 24 h urine collections and self-reported health data. RESULTS: Mean Na:K in NYC adults was 1·7 mg/mg. Elevated Na:K was observed in young, minority, low-education and high-poverty adults. Only 5·2 % of NYC adults had Na:K in the optimal range. CONCLUSIONS: Na intake is high and K intake is low in NYC adults, leading to high Na:K. Na:K is a useful marker and its inclusion for nutrition surveillance in populations, in addition to Na and K intakes, is indicated.


Subject(s)
Potassium, Dietary/analysis , Sodium, Dietary/analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity , New York City , Nutrition Policy , Risk Factors , World Health Organization , Young Adult
19.
Am J Public Health ; 104(6): e5-8, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24825232

ABSTRACT

In 2002, New York City implemented a comprehensive tobacco control plan that discouraged smoking through excise taxes and smoke-free air laws and facilitated quitting through population-wide cessation services and hard-hitting media campaigns. Following the implementation of these activities through a well-funded and politically supported program, the adult smoking rate declined by 28% from 2002 to 2012, and the youth smoking rate declined by 52% from 2001 to 2011. These improvements indicate that local jurisdictions can have a significant positive effect on tobacco control.


Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Prevention , Adolescent , Adult , Health Promotion , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Cessation/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...