Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 61(6): 103497, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842293

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Various therapies have been tried for Covid disease including the use of antivirals, steroids, monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma. METHOD: The study was conducted on convalescent plasma transfused ICU patients. Part A of the study involves clinical outcomes based on gender, age, comorbidities, blood group,and the average length of stay. Part B investigates clinical outcomes in patients transfused with convalescent plasma before and after the November 2021 guidelines. Part C of the study includes patients in cytokine storm and the efficacy of tocilizumab in these patients. RESULT: Out of the 326 ICU patients transfused with convalescent plasma the overall mortality was 152 (53.3 %). On comparing blood groups and clinical outcomes, a clinically significant result was found. A clinically significant association was also seen on comparing the clinical outcome of 18-50 years and 61-70 years age group and in female gender patients. The average number of ICU days had a positive impact on the overall patient survival. Out of the patients in 'cytokine storm' (n = 109), on day 20, the survival percentage in the non-Tocilizumab group showed a downward trend throughout. However, in the Tocilizumab group, the survival percentage remained stable throughout till around day 50. CONCLUSION: Amongst the convalescent plasma transfused ICU patients, females, having blood group B, and an average length of stay of fewer than 20 days had a better chance of survival. The patients given tocilizumab and convalescent plasma had a better chance of survival compared to tocilizumab alone.


Subject(s)
Blood Group Antigens , COVID-19 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Cytokines , Intensive Care Units , COVID-19 Serotherapy
2.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 9(8): 4170-4173, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33110827

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most common sleep-disordered breathing characterized by repeated cessation or reduction in airflow during sleep. OSA occurs in both obese and nonobese individual. This study was designed to compare the clinical and polysomnographic data between obese and nonobese patients with OSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included all the patients diagnosed as between November 2013 and December 2014. The patients were classified into nonobese (n = 23) and obese (n = 72) groups if their body mass index (BMI) was <27.5 and ≥27.5, respectively. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software program, version 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 95 patients of OSA, of which 23 (44.4%) were nonobese and 72 (75.78%) were obese with a mean BMI of 24.37 ± 3.09 and 34.27 ± 8.34 kg/m2, respectively. Characteristics, such as male predominance, higher BMI, neck circumference, and loud snoring, were significantly higher in obese group (P < 0.05) as compared to nonobese. Mild OSA (AHI 5-15) was significantly higher in nonobese patients (39.13% vs. 5.55%, P < 0.00001), whereas severe OSA (AHI >30) was higher in obese patients as compared with nonobese (66.66% vs. 30.43%, P = 0.002). When comparing comorbidities, the hypertension was significantly higher in the obese (47.22% vs. 13.04%, P = 0.003) than the nonobese patients. The incidence of diabetes (37.50% vs. 17.39%) and hypothyroidism (16.66% vs. 4.34%) was also higher in obese group as compared with nonobese. No significant difference was found for mean age, racial origin (Asian/African), and ESS score between obese and nonobese patients. CONCLUSION: Obstructive sleep apnoea is not restricted to only obese individual; rather it also occurs in nonobese. The severity of OSA in nonobese has generally less as compared with obese and its early identification required high index of suspicion.

3.
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci ; 57(1): 48-64, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26410986

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) are subsets of sleep-disordered breathing. Awareness about OSA and its consequences amongst the general public as well as the majority of primary care physcians across India is poor. This necessiated the development of the INdian initiative on Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (INOSA) guidelines under the auspices of Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. OSA is the occurrence of an average five or more episodes of obstructive respiratory events per hour of sleep with either sleep related symptoms or comorbidities or ≥ 15 such episodes without any sleep related symptoms or comorbidities. OSAS is defined as OSA associated with daytime symptoms, most often excessive sleepiness. Patients undergoing routine health check-up with snoring, daytime sleepiness, obesity, hypertension, motor vehicular accidents and high risk cases should undergo a comprehensive sleep evaluation. Medical examiners evaluating drivers, air pilots, railway drivers and heavy machinery workers should be educated about OSA and should comprehensively evaluate applicants for OSA. Those suspected to have OSA on comprehensive sleep evaluation should be referred for a sleep study. Supervised overnight polysomnography (PSG) is the "gold standard" for evaluation of OSA. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the mainstay of treatment of OSA. Oral appliances are indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate OSA who prefer oral appliances to PAP, or who do not respond to PAP or who fail treatment attempts with PAP or behavioural measures. Surgical treatment is recommended in patients who have failed or are intolerant to PAP therapy.


Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Humans , India , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology
4.
Lung India ; 32(4): 422-34, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26180408

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) are subsets of sleep-disordered breathing. Awareness about OSA and its consequences among the general public as well as the majority of primary care physicians across India is poor. This necessitated the development of the Indian initiative on obstructive sleep apnea (INOSA) guidelines under the auspices of Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. OSA is the occurrence of an average five or more episodes of obstructive respiratory events per hour of sleep with either sleep-related symptoms or co-morbidities or ≥15 such episodes without any sleep-related symptoms or co-morbidities. OSAS is defined as OSA associated with daytime symptoms, most often excessive sleepiness. Patients undergoing routine health check-up with snoring, daytime sleepiness, obesity, hypertension, motor vehicular accidents, and high-risk cases should undergo a comprehensive sleep evaluation. Medical examiners evaluating drivers, air pilots, railway drivers, and heavy machinery workers should be educated about OSA and should comprehensively evaluate applicants for OSA. Those suspected to have OSA on comprehensive sleep evaluation should be referred for a sleep study. Supervised overnight polysomnography is the "gold standard" for evaluation of OSA. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the mainstay of treatment of OSA. Oral appliances (OA) are indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate OSA who prefer OA to PAP, or who do not respond to PAP or who fail treatment attempts with PAP or behavioral measures. Surgical treatment is recommended in patients who have failed or are intolerant to PAP therapy.

5.
Indian J Med Res ; 140(3): 451-68, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25366217

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) are subsets of sleep-disordered breathing. Awareness about OSA and its consequences amongst the general public as well as the majority of primary care physcians across India is poor. This necessiated the development of the INdian initiative on Obstructive sleep apnoea (INOSA) guidelines under the auspices of Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. OSA is the occurrence of an average five or more episodes of obstructive respiratory events per hour of sleep with either sleep related symptoms or co-morbidities or ≥ 15 such episodes without any sleep related symptoms or co-morbidities. OSAS is defined as OSA associated with daytime symptoms, most often excessive sleepiness. Patients undergoing routine health check-up with snoring, daytime sleepiness, obesity, hypertension, motor vehicular accidents and high risk cases should undergo a comprehensive sleep evaluation. Medical examiners evaluating drivers, air pilots, railway drivers and heavy machinery workers should be educated about OSA and should comprehensively evaluate applicants for OSA. Those suspected to have OSA on comprehensive sleep evaluation should be referred for a sleep study. Supervised overnight polysomnography (PSG) is the "gold standard" for evaluation of OSA. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the mainstay of treatment of OSA. Oral appliances are indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate OSA who prefer oral appliances to PAP, or who do not respond to PAP or who fail treatment attempts with PAP or behavioural measures. Surgical treatment is recommended in patients who have failed or are intolerant to PAP therapy.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , India , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnostic imaging , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Snoring/physiopathology , Snoring/surgery , Ultrasonography
6.
Vet Med Int ; 2012: 672107, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22577609

ABSTRACT

Hepatic disease is often treatable and has a predictable prognosis when a definitive diagnosis is made. The aim of clinicopathological evaluation of hepatobiliary affections is to identify and characterize hepatic damage and dysfunction, identify possible primary causes of secondary liver disease, differentiate causes of icterus, evaluate potential anaesthetic risks, assess prognosis and response to xenobiotics, and monitor response to therapy. This paper describes the different diagnostic methods and imaging techniques employed in diagnosis of hepatobiliary affections in dogs. Besides reviewing the significant clinical manifestations and imaging structural abnormalities in diagnostic approach to different hepatic affections, it also depicts radiographic, ultrasonographic, and wherever applicable, the laparoscopic characterization of different hepatic affections and target lesions encountered in clinical cases presented in the Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, COVAS, Palampur in the year 2007-2008.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...