Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Environ Qual ; 49(1): 38-49, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33016359

ABSTRACT

Grain producers are challenged to maximize crop production while utilizing nutrients efficiently and minimizing negative impacts on water quality. There is a particular concern about nutrient export to the Gulf of Mexico via loss from subsurface drainage systems. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of crop rotation, tillage, crop residue removal, swine manure applications, and cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crops on nitrate-N (NO3 -N) and total reactive phosphorus (TRP) loss via subsurface drainage. The study was evaluated from 2008 through 2015 using 36 0.4-ha plots outfitted with a subsurface drainage water quality monitoring system. Results showed that when swine manure was applied before both corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], drainage water had significantly higher 8-yr-average flow-weighted NO3 -N concentrations compared with swine manure applied before corn only in a corn-soybean rotation. The lowest NO3 -N loss was 15.2 kg N ha-1  yr-1 from a no-till corn-soybean treatment with rye cover crop and spring application of urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) to corn. The highest NO3 -N loss was 29.5 kg N ha-1  yr-1 from swine manure applied to both corn and soybean. A rye cover crop reduced NO3 -N loss, whereas tillage and residue management had little impact on NO3 -N loss. Losses of TRP averaged <32 g P ha-1  yr-1 from all treatments. Corn yield was negatively affected by both no-till management and cereal rye cover crops. Results showed that cropping management affected N leaching but impacts on P leaching were minimal.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Water Quality , Animals , Nitrogen/analysis , Glycine max , Swine , Zea mays
2.
J Environ Manage ; 252: 109582, 2019 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31614262

ABSTRACT

A long-term poultry manure fertilizer study was initiated in 1998 and continued until 2009 under corn-soybean (CS) rotation. To match changing landscape trends, the plots were switched to continuous corn (CC) from 2010 to 2017. In both CS and CC phases, poultry manure (PM) was applied at the crop rotation recommended agronomic N rate and either half (CC phase) or double (CS phase) the recommended rate. Urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) was applied to comparison plots at the crop recommended application rate (168 kg N ha-1 and 224 kg N ha-1 for the CS and CC phases, respectively) throughout the study. The objectives of this study include evaluation of the economic benefits of long-term PM application at various rates (PM2, PM, and PM0.5), and the impact of poultry manure application on soil health and nutrient levels, crop yield, and drainage water quality. Lower NO3-N concentrations were reported in drainage from PM treated plots when compared to UAN fertilizer applied at the same agronomic rate. Of the parameters tested for soil health analysis after twenty years of repeat application, particulate organic matter (POM) present was significantly greater in the PM treated soils (6.1-6.7 g kg soil-1) when compared to UAN plots (4.6 g kg soil-1), showing potential for stabilized soil particles, increased infiltration and water-holding capacity. The results show a consistent positive impact of manure application on corn and soybean yields when compared to yields observed in UAN treated plots. During the CS phase, we estimated the same average revenue per dollar spent for PM and UAN treatments, while the average return rate for PM2 was 1% lower; during CC phase,15% increased return rates were observed when PM0.5 and PM were compared against the UAN treatment. When managed properly, PM application to cropland is a sustainable option for diversifying agroecosystems, improving soil health and improving farm economics.


Subject(s)
Manure , Soil , Animals , Fertilizers , Nitrogen , Poultry , Water Quality
3.
J Environ Qual ; 38(6): 2412-21, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875797

ABSTRACT

Bacteria transport in soils primarily occurs through soil mesopores and macropores (e.g., biopores and cracks). Field research has demonstrated that biopores and subsurface drains can be hydraulically connected. This research was conducted to investigate the importance of surface connected and disconnected (buried) biopores on Escherichia coli (E. coli) transport when biopores are located near subsurface drains. A soil column (28 by 50 by 95 cm) was packed with loamy sand and sandy loam soils to bulk densities of 1.6 and 1.4 Mg m(-3), respectively, and containing an artificial biopore located directly above a subsurface drain. The sandy loam soil was packed using two different methods: moist soil sieved to 4.0 mm and air-dried soil manually crushed and then sieved to 2.8 mm. A 1-cm constant head was induced on the soil surface in three flushes: (i) water, (ii) diluted liquid swine (Sus scrofa) manure 48 h later, and (iii) water 48 h after the manure. Escherichia coli transport to the drain was observed with either open surface connected or buried biopores. In surface connected biopores, E. coli transport was a function of the soil type and the layer thickness between the end of the biopore and drain. Buried biopores contributed flow and E. coli in the less sorptive soil (loamy sand) and the sorptive soil (sandy loam) containing a wide (i.e., with mesopores) pore space distribution prevalent due to the moist soil packing technique. Biopores provide a mechanism for rapidly transporting E. coli into subsurface drains during flow events.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli , Soil Microbiology , Soil , Animals , Manure/microbiology , Swine , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...