'You get this conflict between you as a person and you in your role that changes you': A thematic analysis of how inpatient psychiatric healthcare staff in the UK experience restraint, seclusion, and other restrictive practices.

A high proportion of psychiatric inpatients experience Restrictive Practice (RP) during admission. Numerous reports have highlighted adverse effects on patients and staff. However, qualitative research focussed on experience, impact, and coping mechanisms of healthcare staff in the UK is limited. Therefore, this study explored psychiatric healthcare staff experience of RP on inpatient wards in the UK. Eight semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews, of ~60 min, were conducted via telephone/Skype and transcribed verbatim. A critical realist epistemology was used to thematically analyse data. Three themes were identified: the coexistence of accountability, power and subjection; impacts on the individual and professional relationships, and coping with difficult experiences and emotions. Restrictive practice can negatively affect staff experience, working relationships, and wellbeing. Opportunities for support could mediate adverse effects. Future research could further explore coping mechanisms and organizational factors contributing to negative staff experiences.

Living 'in between' outside and inside: The forensic psychiatric unit as an impermanent assemblage.

This paper presents analysis from 'a study of staff and patient experiences of the restrictive environments of a forensic psychiatric unit. The paper conceptualises the forensic unit as an impermanent assemblage, enacted in and through practices that hold a future life outside the unit simultaneously near, yet far. We show how the near-far relations between life inside and outside the unit operate in three ways; 1) in relation to the 'care pathway', 2) practices of dwelling, and 3) creating and maintaining connections to life 'beyond' the unit. The paper concludes with a discussion about possible ways to overcome the limitations to recovery that can arise through practices of impermanence.

Examining professionals' perspectives on sexuality for service users of a forensic psychiatry unit.

Very little is known about the sexual activities of psychiatric patients during their stay in hospital and beyond. In this article, we have explored how mental health professionals working within a forensic psychiatric unit construct the issue of patient sexuality in order to ascertain the range of sexual possibilities open to patients. Drawing on interviews with twenty four participants--psychiatrists and clinical psychologists (clinical staff), we examined how participants made sense of patient sexuality and their clinical judgments in relation to them. Using a thematic analysis, we were able to identify a number of relevant themes emerging, including a) what the limits of acceptable sexual behaviour were judged to be, b) discrimination against transgender and same sex relationships, c) vulnerability among female patients and therapeutic efficacy, and d) an abject fear of patient pregnancy. Furthermore, a general concern throughout was the putative professional conflict between the clinical and ward staff. Further discussion regarding the potential for clearer policy on patient sexuality and further training for professionals is developed in the final section.

Transformations of self and sexuality: psychologically modified experiences in the context of forensic mental health.

Forensic mental health inpatients in medium-secure settings have a limited capacity for sexual expression during their stay in hospital. This is due to a number of factors, including a lack of willingness on behalf of staff to engage with sexual issues, as a result of safety fears and ambiguity regarding the ability of the patient to consent. Furthermore, UK forensic medium-secure units do not provide conjugal suites for patients to have sexual relations, with their spouse or other patients. To date, there is no empirical research on how forensic psychiatric patients (or service users) manage their sexuality, while in hospital and when released into the community. Here, we present an analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients at a UK medium forensic unit, in order to explore these issues further. More specifically, we examine how the public exclusion of sexuality from these units results in sexuality being experienced as sectioned off or amputated, such that a new form of sexuality emerges, one that has been cultivated by the psychologically informed practices operating within the unit. This process, we argue, produces a psychologically modified experience, a new form of self-relation that continues to modify when released into the broader ecology of the community.