Sex-Specific Left Ventricular and Aorta Size Cut-Off Values for Hemodynamically Significant Chronic Aortic Regurgitation　- Implications for Treatment in Asian Populations.

BACKGROUND: There are no sex-specific guidelines for chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). This retrospective study examined sex-specific differences and propose treatment criteria from an Asian AR cohort.Methods and Results: Consecutive 1,305 patients with moderate-severe AR or greater at 3 tertiary centers in Taiwan and Japan (2008-2022) were identified. Study endpoints were aortic valve surgery (AVS), all-cause death (ACD), and cardiovascular death (CVD). The median follow up was 3.9 years (interquartile range 1.3-7.1 years). Compared with men (n=968), women (n=337) were older, had more advanced symptoms, more comorbidities, larger indexed aorta size (iAortamax) and indexed left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (LVESDi; P<0.001 for all). Symptomatic status was poorly correlated with the degree of LV remodeling in women (P≥0.18). Women received fewer AVS (P≤0.001) and men had better overall 10-year survival (P<0.01). Ten-year post-AVS survival (P=0.9) and the progression of LV remodeling were similar between sexes (P≥0.16). Multivariable determinants of ACD and CVD were age, advanced symptoms, iAortamax, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LVESDi, LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi), and Taiwanese ethnicity (all P<0.05), but not female sex (P≥0.05). AVS was associated with better survival (P<0.01). Adjusted LVEF, LVESDi, LVESVi, and iAortamaxcut-off values for ACD were 53%, 24.8 mm/m2, 44 mL/m2, and 25.5 mm/m2, respectively, in women and 52%, 23.4 mm/m2, 52 mL/m2, and 23.2 mm/m2, respectively, in men. CONCLUSIONS: Early detection and intervention using sex-specific cut-off values may improve survival in women with AR.

Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques (PREVENT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death are often caused by rupture and thrombosis of lipid-rich atherosclerotic coronary plaques (known as vulnerable plaques), many of which are non-flow-limiting. The safety and effectiveness of focal preventive therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention of vulnerable plaques in reducing adverse cardiac events are unknown. We aimed to assess whether preventive percutaneous coronary intervention of non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques improves clinical outcomes compared with optimal medical therapy alone. METHODS: PREVENT was a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial done at 15 research hospitals in four countries (South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and New Zealand). Patients aged 18 years or older with non-flow-limiting (fractional flow reserve >0·80) vulnerable coronary plaques identified by intracoronary imaging were randomly assigned (1:1) to either percutaneous coronary intervention plus optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone, in block sizes of 4 or 6, stratified by diabetes status and the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention in a non-study target vessel. Follow-up continued annually in all enrolled patients until the last enrolled patient reached 2 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven target-vessel revascularisation, or hospitalisation for unstable or progressive angina, assessed in the intention-to-treat population at 2 years. Time-to-first-event estimates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test. This report is the principal analysis from the trial and includes all long-term analysed data. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02316886, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2015, and Sept 29, 2021, 5627 patients were screened for eligibility, 1606 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to percutaneous coronary intervention (n=803) or optimal medical therapy alone (n=803). 1177 (73%) patients were men and 429 (27%) were women. 2-year follow-up for the primary outcome assessment was completed in 1556 (97%) patients (percutaneous coronary intervention group n=780; optimal medical therapy group n=776). At 2 years, the primary outcome occurred in three (0·4%) patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention group and in 27 (3·4%) patients in the medical therapy group (absolute difference -3·0 percentage points [95% CI -4·4 to -1·8]; p=0·0003). The effect of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention was directionally consistent for each component of the primary composite outcome. Serious clinical or adverse events did not differ between the percutaneous coronary intervention group and the medical therapy group: at 2 years, four (0·5%) versus ten (1·3%) patients died (absolute difference -0·8 percentage points [95% CI -1·7 to 0·2]) and nine (1·1%) versus 13 (1·7%) patients had myocardial infarction (absolute difference -0·5 percentage points [-1·7 to 0·6]). INTERPRETATION: In patients with non-flow-limiting vulnerable coronary plaques, preventive percutaneous coronary intervention reduced major adverse cardiac events arising from high-risk vulnerable plaques, compared with optimal medical therapy alone. Given that PREVENT is the first large trial to show the potential effect of the focal treatment for vulnerable plaques, these findings support consideration to expand indications for percutaneous coronary intervention to include non-flow-limiting, high-risk vulnerable plaques. FUNDING: The CardioVascular Research Foundation, Abbott, Yuhan Corp, CAH-Cordis, Philips, and Infraredx, a Nipro company.

Who needs to be screened for primary aldosteronism?

The prevalence of patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) is about 5%-15% in hypertensive patients, and it is common cause of secondary hypertension in clinical practice. Two major causes of PA are noted, namely bilateral adrenal hyperplasia and aldosterone-producing adenoma, and the general diagnosis is based on three steps: (1) screening, (2) confirmatory testing, and (3) subtype differentiation (Figure 1). The recommendation for screening patients is at an increased risk of PA, here we focus on which patients should be screened for PA, not only according to well-established guidelines but for potential patients with PA. We recommend screening for 1) patients with resistant or persistent hypertension, 2) hypertensive patients with hypokalemia (spontaneous or drug-induced), 3) young hypertensive patients (age <40 years), and 4) all hypertensive patients with a history of PA in first-degree relatives. Moreover, we suggest screening for 1) hypertensive patients themselves or first-degree relatives with early target organ damage, such as stroke and other diseases, 2) all hypertensive patients with a concurrent adrenal incidentaloma, 3) hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea, 4) hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation unexplained by structural heart defects and/or other conditions resulting in the arrhythmia, 5) hypertensive patients with anxiety and other psychosomatic symptoms, and 6) hypertensive patients without other comorbidities to maintain cost-effectiveness.

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) as a screening tool for primary aldosteronism (PA).

The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is the standard screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). Because of the poor reproducibility of the ARR, repeat testing is recommended if the result is not compatible with the clinical condition. Various methods to measure renin are used in different hospitals in Taiwan, and the ARR cutoff values also differ among laboratories. The Task Force of Taiwan PA recommend using plasma renin activity (PRA) to calculate ARR instead of direct renin concentration (DRC) unless PRA is unavailable, because PRA is widely used in international guidelines and most studies.

How should anti-hypertensive medications be adjusted before screening for primary aldosteronism?

Anti-hypertensive medications may affect plasma renin activity and/or plasma aldosterone concentration, misleading the interpretation of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio when screening for primary aldosteronism. The Task Force of Taiwan PA recommends that, when necessary, using α-adrenergic receptor blocking agents, centrally acting α-adrenergic agonists, and/or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers should be considered to control blood pressure before screening for PA. We recommend temporarily holding ß-adrenergic receptor blocking agents, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and all diuretics before screening for PA. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the recommendations.

Accurate Prediction of Retrograde Collateral Channel Crossing in Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention.

Successful collateral channel (CC) crossing is an essential step in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). We previously developed a dedicated CC score based on CC size and tortuosity to facilitate target CC selection. Validation and comparison to other scoring systems were lacking. Thus, the aims of this study were to (1) validate the CC score in a larger independent cohort, and (2) compare its accuracy and clinical usefulness with the J-channel score. All coronary CTO PCIs attempted by experienced high-volume operators from January 2017 to December 2021 were enrolled. The CC and J-channel scores were calculated for all attempted CCs with bi-plane high-resolution cine angiography images. CC crossing success was defined as guidewire reaching the distal true lumen retrogradely. In total, 502 patients who received CTO PCI were included. The retrograde approach was utilized in 244 target CTOs, and a total of 329 CCs were attempted. The overall CC crossing rate was 67.8% (223 of 329) and final technical success rate 92.2% (225 of 244). The average CC score was 2.0 and average J-channel score was 0.71. The sensitivity and specificity of successful CC crossing with the CC score ≥2 were 81.2%, and 84.0%, respectively. Comparison between the CC score (area under the curve 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.90) and the J-channel score (area under the curve 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.67) demonstrated superior predictive performance of the CC score (p <0.001). The CC score was an easy-to-use and accurate tool for the prediction of successful CC crossing in retrograde CTO PCI. The CC score can help operators select the ideal target CC, thereby facilitating final procedural success.

Low- or standard-dose edoxaban versus antiplatelet therapy for leaflet thrombus and cerebral thromboembolism after TAVR: A prespecified analysis of randomized ADAPT-TAVR trial.

BACKGROUND: The risks of leaflet thrombosis and the associated cerebral thromboembolism are unknown according to different anticoagulation dosing after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim was to evaluate the incidence of leaflet thrombosis and cerebral thromboembolism between low-dose (30 mg) or standard-dose (60 mg) edoxaban and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after TAVR. METHODS: In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the ADAPT-TAVR trial, the primary endpoint was the incidence of leaflet thrombosis on 4-dimensional computed tomography at 6-months. Key secondary endpoints were new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and neurological and neurocognitive dysfunction. RESULTS: Of 229 patients enrolled in this study, 118 patients were DAPT group and 111 were edoxaban group (43 [39.1%] 60 mg vs 68 [61.3%] 30 mg). There was a significantly lower incidence of leaflet thrombosis in the standard-dose edoxaban group than in the DAPT group (2.4% vs 18.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.55; P = .03). However, no significant difference was observed between low-dose edoxaban and DAPT (15.0% vs 18.3%; OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.32-1.81; P = .58). Irrespective of different antithrombotic regiments, the percentages of patients with new cerebral lesions on brain MRI and worsening neurological or neurocognitive function were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In patients without an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR, the incidence of leaflet thrombosis was significantly lower with standard-dose edoxaban but not with low-dose edoxaban, as compared with DAPT. However, this differential effect of edoxaban on leaflet thrombosis was not associated with a reduction of new cerebral thromboembolism and neurological dysfunction.

Frequency, Predictors, and Clinical Impact of Valvular and Perivalvular Thrombus After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical aortic valve complex (valvular and perivalvular) thrombus is not rare after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The risk factors and clinical implications of these findings remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the frequency, predictors, and clinical outcome of aortic valve complex thrombus after TAVR. METHODS: In the ADAPT-TAVR (Anticoagulation Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Embolization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) trial comparing edoxaban vs dual antiplatelet therapy in TAVR patients without an indication for chronic anticoagulation, the frequency of valvular (subclinical leaflet thrombus) and perivalvular (supravalvular, subvalvular, and sinus of Valsalva) thrombus was evaluated by 4-dimensional computed tomography at 6 months. The association of these phenomena with new cerebral thromboembolism on brain magnetic resonance imaging, neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction, and clinical outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Among 211 patients with 6-month computed tomography evaluations, 91 patients (43.1%) had thrombus at any aortic valve complex, 30 (14.2%) patients had leaflet thrombus, and 78 (37.0%) patients had perivalvular thrombus. A small maximum diameter of the stent at the valve level and low body surface area were independent predictors of aortic valve complex and perivalvular thrombus, and decreased renal function was an independent predictor of leaflet thrombus. No significant differences were observed in new cerebral lesions, neurologic or neurocognitive functions, or clinical outcomes among patients with or without valvular or perivalvular thrombus. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical aortic valve complex (valvular and perivalvular) thrombus was common in patients who had undergone successful TAVR. However, these imaging phenomena were not associated with new cerebral thromboembolism, neurologic or neurocognitive dysfunction, or adverse clinical outcomes. (Anticoagulation Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Embolization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [ADAPT-TAVR]; NCT03284827).

Differentiation of Alkyl- and Plasmenyl-phosphatidylcholine by Endogenous Sphingomyelin RT-XLOGP3 Regression for Coronary Artery Disease Plasma Lipidomics Analysis.

Accurate identification between alkyl- and plasmenyl-phosphatidylcholine (PC(O-) and PC(P-)) isomers is a major analytical challenge in lipidomics studies due to a lack of structure-specific ions in conventional tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods and the absence of universal retention time (RT) references. Given the importance of PC(O-) and PC(P-), an easy-to-apply method for current research is urgently needed. In this study, we present a quadratic RT-XLOGP3SM regression model that uses endogenous sphingomyelin (SM) species in blood samples as retention time (RT) indicators to predict the RTs of PC(O-) and PC(P-) species by coupling their calculated partition coefficients based on XLOGP3. The prediction results were obtained with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.12 min (1.3%) for the RRHD (rapid resolution high definition) nonlinear LC condition. A lipidomic analysis with RT-XLOGP3SM regression was used to study lipid regulation in coronary artery disease (CAD) outpatient plasma samples, and we found that the types of exhibited regulation were highly dependent on the lipid subclasses in comparison to the healthy control group. In conclusion, given that the quadratic RT-XLOGP3SM regression model predicts the RTs of PC species based on the relative value of XLOGP3 and the RTs of endogenous SM species, it can be expected that most of the C18-based lipidomics analyses could apply this method to increase the identification ability of the PC(O-) and PC(P-) subclasses and to improve the understanding of their physiological functions.

Results of streamlining TAVR procedure towards a minimalist approach: a single center experience in Taiwan.

Trans-femoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) performed under conscious sedation (LACS) is not yet become routine practice in Taiwan. We aimed to compared the results between patients received general anesthesia (GA) versus LACS. Our cohort was divided into 3 groups: initial 48 patients received TF-TAVR under routine GA (GA group), subsequent 50 patients under routine LACS (LACS group 1), and recent 125 patients under LACS (LACS group 2). The baseline, procedural characteristics and all outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively compared. From Sep 2010 to July 2019, a total of 223 patients were included. The procedure time (157.6 ± 39.4 min vs 131.6 ± 30.3 vs 95.2 ± 40.0, < 0.0001), contrast medium consumption (245.6 ± 92.6 ml vs 207.8 ± 77.9 vs 175.1 ± 64.6, < 0.0001), length of intensive care unit (2 [1-5] days vs 2 [1-3] vs 1 [1-1], P = 0.0001) and hospital stay (9 [7-13] days vs 8 [6-11] vs 6 [5-9], P = 0.0001) decreased significantly with LACS, combined with a trend of less hospital acquired pneumonia (12.5% vs 6.0% vs 5.6%, P = 0.427). 1-year survival rate were also different among 3 groups (83.3% vs 90.0% vs 93.6%, P = 0.053). In our single center experience, a "minimalist" approach of TF-TAVR procedure resulted in less medical resources usage, along with more favorable clinical outcomes.

Renal Impact of Culprit-Only versus Multi-Vessel Revascularization for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The optimal strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial. We aimed to elucidate the renal and cardiovascular impact of culprit-only (C) revascularization versus additional interventions on non-infarct-related arteries. Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant literature. A total of 96,812 subjects [C-PCI: 69,986; multi-vessel (MV)-PCI: 26,826] in nine studies (one randomized control trial; eight observational cohort studies) were enrolled. Results: MV-PCI was associated with a higher kidney event rate [relative risk (RR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.49; p < 0.001]. However, the all-cause mortality rate was comparable both during admission (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94-1.22; p = 0.30) and at one year (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79-1.16; p = 0.65). MV-PCI was associated with a greater risk of stroke (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.32; p < 0.001) and bleeding events (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07-1.51; p = 0.006), but reduced risk of recurrent MI (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.97; p = 0.009) and repeat revascularization (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.71; p = 0.004). No increased risk of coronary artery bypass grafting was present (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.38-3.17; p = 0.87). Conclusions: C-PCI was associated with a lower rate of renal dysfunction but not all-cause mortality in patients with CS complicating acute MI.

Quantification of cardiac pumping mechanics in TAVI patients: A pilot study utilizing minimally invasive method for pressure-volume analysis.

The ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC) and left ventricle (LV) mechanics are crucial and play an important role in the pathophysiology of aortic stenosis (AS). The pressure-volume (PV) analysis is a powerful tool to study VAC and LV mechanics. We proposed a novel minimally-invasive method for PV analysis in patients with severe AS receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Patients with severe AS were prospectively enrolled in a single center. LV pressure and cardiac output were recorded before and after TAVI. We constructed the PV loop for analysis by analyzing LV pressure and the assumed flow. 26 patients were included for final analysis. The effective arterial elastance (Ea) decreased after TAVI (3.7 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.1 mmHg/mL, p < 0.0001). The LV end-systolic elastance (Ees) did not change immediately after TAVI (2.4 ± 1.3 vs. 2.6 ± 1.1 mmHg/mL, p = 0.3670). The Ea/Ees improved after TAVI (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.0001), demonstrating an immediate improvement of VAC. The stroke work (SW) did not change (7669.6 ± 1913.8 vs. 7626.2 ± 2546.9, p = 0.9330), but the pressure-volume area (PVA) decreased (14469.0 ± 4974.1 vs. 12177.4 ± 4499.9, p = 0.0374) after TAVI. The SW/PVA increased after TAVI (0.55 ± 0.12 vs. 0.63 ± 0.08, p < 0.0001) representing an improvement of LV efficiency. We proposed a novel minimally invasive method for PV analysis in patients with severe AS receiving TAVI. The VAC and LV efficiency improved immediately after TAVI.

Impact of leaflet thrombosis on valve haemodynamic status after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of subclinical leaflet thrombosis, characterised by hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT), on the valve haemodynamic function and durability of the bioprosthetic valve, is not yet determined. We determined the impact of HALT on valve haemodynamics after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and the predictors of haemodynamic structural valve deterioration (SVD). METHODS: The Anticoagulation vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Embolization after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement(ADAPT-TAVR) trial is a multicenter, randomised trial that compared edoxaban and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who had undergone successful TAVR. The presence of HALT was evaluated by four-dimensional CT at 6 months and serial echocardiography performed at baseline, immediately post-TAVR and after 6 months. SVD was defined as at least one of the following: (1) mean transprosthetic gradient ≥20 mm Hg, (2) change in the mean gradient ≥10 mm Hg from baseline, or (3) new or increase in intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation of at least ≥1 grade, resulting in moderate or greater regurgitation. RESULTS: At 6 months, HALT was found in 30 of 211 (14.2%) patients. The presence of HALT did not significantly affect aortic valve mean gradients (with vs without HALT; 14.0±4.8 mm Hg vs 13.7±5.5 mm Hg; p=0.74) at 6 months. SVD was reported in 30 of 206 patients (14.6%) at 6-month follow-up echocardiography. Older age (OR: 1.138; 95% CI: 1.019 to 1.293; p=0.033), use of aortic valve size ≤23 mm (OR: 6.254; 95% CI: 2.230 to 20.569; p=0.001) and mean post-TAVR pressure gradient (OR: 1.233; 95% CI: 1.123 to 1.371; p<0.001) were independent predictors of haemodynamic SVD; however, the presence of HALT was not identified as a predictor of SVD. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had undergone successful TAVR, aortic valve haemodynamic status was not influenced by the presence of HALT. Although HALT was not a predictor of haemodynamic SVD at 6 months, it warrants further longer-term follow-up to evaluate the effect on long-term valve durability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03284827 (https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov).

Effect of Edoxaban Versus Antiplatelet Therapy on Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Thromboembolism After TAVI According to Major Clinical and Anatomic Factors in Prespecified Subgroup Analysis from the ADAPT-TAVR Trial.

It is unknown whether edoxaban versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has differential treatment effects on leaflet thrombosis, cerebral thromboembolism, and neurologic or neurocognitive dysfunction according to clinical and anatomic factors after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. To investigate the relative effects of edoxaban and DAPT on leaflet and cerebral thromboembolism in patients with major risk factors. The primary end point of this study was the incidence of leaflet thrombosis on computed tomography at 6 months. The secondary end points were new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Cox regression models assessed the consistency of the treatment effects in the prespecified subgroups. The favorable effect of edoxaban versus DAPT on the leaflet thrombosis was consistent across multiple clinical or anatomic subgroups, without significant interaction between the drug effect and each subgroup (p for interaction for age = 0.597, gender = 0.557, body mass index = 0.866, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score = 0.307, valve type = 0.702, edoxaban reduction criteria = 0.604, and valve morphology = 0.688). However, the incidence of new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and worsening of neurologic and neurocognitive function were not significantly different between the groups among the various key subgroups. The relative effects of edoxaban and DAPT on the risk of leaflet thrombosis, cerebral thromboembolism, and neurologic dysfunction were consistent across a diverse spectrum of clinical or anatomical factors. Further studies are required to define tailored antithrombotic therapy for high-risk groups with specific clinical or anatomic characteristics.

Impact of post-implantation time on bioresorbable vascular scaffold outcomes for type C versus non-type C coronary lesions: A longer-term study.

BACKGROUND: We have demonstrated that bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) for ACC/AHA type C lesions was associated with higher risks of long-term target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target lesion failure (TLF). We determined the specific time after which higher risks of BVS for type C lesions are reduced in a longer-term follow-up. METHODS: We analyzed data of 457 patients (59 ± 12 years, 87% male) with 714 BVS implanted for 529 lesions and a median follow-up of 56.4 (48.6-62.6) months. Patients with BVS for at least one type C lesion (N = 177) at index intervention and all non-type C lesions (N = 280) were compared for TLF (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, TLR). We specified the interactions between the non-type C versus type C group and the event-free survival times dichotomized at 24, 30, 32, 33, 36, and 39 months respectively. RESULTS: The type C group had more multivessel disease (86% versus 65%, p < 0.001), left anterior descending artery treated (68% versus 53%, p = 0.002), intravascular imaging used (48% vs. 25%, p < 0.001), and BVS (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.001) implanted with a longer total length (57 ± 21 vs. 29 ± 8 mm, p < 0.001). The TLR or TLF was higher (both log-rank p < 0.05) in the type C than in the non-type C group. However, the risks of TLR (hazard ratio: 3.6, 95% CI = 1.1-11.6) and TLF (hazard ratio: 3.8, 95% CI = 1.2-12.1) for type C lesions only remained higher until 24 months post-BVS implantation. CONCLUSION: BVS provides a longer-term advantage, particularly for type C lesions with the majority requiring long stenting.

Association of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Beta-Blockers in Patients with and without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Long-Term Follow-Up Results of the T-SPARCLE and T-PPARCLE Registry in Taiwan.

Beta-blockers are widely used, but the benefit is now challenged in patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the present coronary reperfusion era. We aimed to identify the risk factors of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and the long-term effect of beta-blockers in two large cohorts in Taiwan. Two prospective observational cohorts, including patients with known atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (T-SPARCLE) and patients with at least one risk factor of ASCVD but without clinically evident ASCVD (T-PPARCLE), were conducted in Taiwan. The primary endpoint is the time of first occurrence of a MACE (cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest with resuscitation). Between December 2009 and November 2014, with a median 2.4 years follow-up, 11,747 eligible patients (6921 and 4826 in T-SPARCLE and T-PPARCLE, respectively) were enrolled. Among them, 273 patients (2.3%) met the primary endpoint. With multivariate Cox PH model analysis, usage of beta-blocker was lower in patients with MACE (42.9% vs. 52.4%, p < 0.01). In patients with ASCVD, beta-blocker usage was associated with lower MACEs (hazard ratio 0.72; p < 0.001), but not in patients without ASCVD. The event-free survival of beta-blocker users remained higher during the follow-up period (p < 0.005) of ASCVD patients. In conclusion, in ASCVD patients, reduced MACE was associated with beta-blocker usage, and the effect was maintained during a six-year follow-up. Prescribing beta-blockers as secondary prevention is reasonable in the Taiwanese population.

On-Table Catheter-Based Neurosalvage Performed by Cardiologists for Embolic Complication during an Endovascular Procedure.

Objectives: To report our experience and clinical results of neurosalvage techniques, performed by interventional cardiologists without moving the patient, to manage cerebral thromboembolic complications. Background: Iatrogenic emboli may be released during an endovascular procedure, causing permanent neurological complications and catastrophic outcomes. Methods: Between July 2013 and December 2017, a total of eight patients suffered from embolic complications during endovascular procedures (two radiofrequency catheter ablation, five coronary angiogram/angioplasty, and one subclavian artery angioplasty). Catheter-based neurosalvage was attempted by experienced interventional cardiologists promptly in the same catheterization room. Results: The embolized locations were the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery in four patients, the M2/M3 segments in three, and the basilar artery in one. Access to the supra-aortic vessels was achieved. Local intra-arterial thrombolysis was given in five patients (63%) and balloon angioplasty in three (38%). Intra-arterial thrombectomy with a stent retriever was attempted in three patients but failed in one. A combination of different techniques was used in three patients (38%). Final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 3 flow was achieved in seven patients (88%). Favorable clinical outcomes at 1-month follow-up (modified Rankin scale of 0-2) were observed in seven patients (88%), and none of the patients had died at 12 months. Conclusions: Our experience demonstrated that acute embolic complications during an endovascular procedure can be salvaged by interventional cardiologists with acceptable angiographic and clinical results.

Effects of short-term oral anticoagulation following surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for patients after surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR); however, the potential benefits remain controversial. This study evaluated the effects of short-term OAC following bAVR. METHODS: From 2010 to 2017, total 450 patients who underwent bAVR were enrolled. The outcomes of patients who did (OAC group) and who did not receive OAC (without-OAC group) after bAVR were compared. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential confounders, and a 1:1 matched cohort was formed. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD). RESULTS: A total of 175 (39%) patients received OAC after bAVR. The median follow-up period was 2.9 years, the median duration of OAC use was 4 months; 162 pairs of patients were identified after the PSM. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of 1-year embolism/ischemic stroke between the OAC and without-OAC group in PSM cohort (0.62% vs. 1.89% for embolism, p = 0.623; 0 vs. 1.23% for ischemic stroke, p = 0.499). The prevalence of 1-year intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between OAC and without-OAC group was also comparable (0.62% vs. 0.62%, p = 1). The OAC group had a lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR):0.488, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.259-0.919). There was also a trend for reduced BVD in the OAC group (aHR: 0.661, 95% CI: 0.339-1.290). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that short-term OAC use after bAVR was associated with lower all-cause mortality. The prevalence of 1-year embolism/ischemic stroke/ICH were comparable despite of OAC use.

Cardiovascular Risk Reduction After Renal Denervation According to Time in Therapeutic Systolic Blood Pressure Range.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to lower blood pressure (BP), but its effects on cardiovascular events have only been preliminarily evaluated. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) of BP is associated with cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of catheter-based RDN on TTR and its association with cardiovascular outcomes in the GSR (Global SYMPLICITY Registry). METHODS: Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled and treated with radiofrequency RDN. Office and ambulatory systolic blood pressure (OSBP and ASBP) were measured at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postprocedure and used to derive TTR. TTR through 6 months was assessed as a predictor of cardiovascular events from 6 to 36 months using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: As of March 1, 2022, 3,077 patients were enrolled: 42.2% were female; mean age was 60.5 ± 12.2 years; baseline OSBP was 165.6 ± 24.8 mm Hg; and baseline ASBP was 154.3 ± 18.7 mm Hg. Patients were prescribed 4.9 ± 1.7 antihypertensive medications at baseline and 4.8 ± 1.9 at 36 months. At 36 months, mean changes were -16.7 ± 28.4 and -9.0 ± 20.2 mm Hg for OSBP and ASBP, respectively. TTR through 6 months was 30.6%. A 10% increase in TTR after RDN through 6 months was associated with significant risk reductions from 6 to 36 months of 15% for major adverse cardiovascular events (P < 0.001), 11% cardiovascular death (P = 0.010), 15% myocardial infarction (P = 0.023), and 23% stroke (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were sustained BP reductions and higher TTR through 36 months after RDN. A 10% increase in TTR through 6 months was associated with significant risk reductions in major cardiovascular events from 6 to 36 months. (Global SYMPLICITY Registry [GSR] DEFINE; NCT01534299).