Association between estradiol levels in early pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia after frozen embryo transfer.

Introduction: The failure of remodeling the spiral arteries is associated with the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Estradiol (E2) plays a crucial role in placentation and may be involved in the development of preeclampsia. However, there is a lack of data in this area. This study aims to assess the association between serum estradiol levels in early pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients who conceived after frozen embryo transfer (FET) using data from a database at a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. The study period spanned from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the adjusted effect of E2 levels on the risk of preeclampsia. We compared the odds ratios of preeclampsia across quartiles of E2 levels and assessed their significance. Results: Serum E2 levels at the fifth gestational week were significantly different between women with and without preeclampsia after FET programmed cycles (607.5 ± 245.4 vs. 545.6 ± 294.4 pg/ml, p=0.009). A multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that E2 levels in early pregnancy were independent risk factors for preeclampsia. We observed an increased odds ratio of preeclampsia with increasing quartiles of estradiol levels after adjusting for potential confounders in FET programmed cycles. When comparing quartiles 3 and 4 (E2 > 493 pg/ml at the fifth gestational week) to quartiles 1 and 2, the odds ratios of preeclampsia were significantly higher. Conclusion: We found that serum E2 levels in early pregnancy may impact the risk of preeclampsia, particularly following FET programmed cycles. The association between E2 levels in early pregnancy and preeclampsia deserves further investigation.

The value of LH maximum level in predicting optimal oocyte yield following GnRH agonist trigger.

Background: Risk factors associated with a suboptimal response to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists include a high or low body mass index (BMI), prolonged use of oral contraceptive pills, and low luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on either the start or trigger days of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). However, this approach may increase the need for a dual trigger and may also result in a higher incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in hyper-responders. We aimed to investigate whether the maximum LH level during stimulation can serve as a predictive factor for achieving an optimal oocyte yield using the GnRH agonist trigger alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all antagonist protocols or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols triggered with GnRH agonist only between May 2012 and December 2022. Subjects were divided into three groups, depending on basal LH level and LH maximum level. The freeze-all strategy was implemented in all cycles: Group 1, consistently low LH levels throughout COS; Group 2, low basal LH level with high LH max level during COS; Group 3, consistently high LH levels throughout COS. The primary outcome was the oocyte yield rate. The secondary outcome includes the number of collected oocytes, suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger, oocyte maturity rate, fertilized rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. The pregnancy outcomes were calculated for the first FET cycle. Results: Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analysis showed that Group 1 (cycles with consistently low LH levels throughout COS) remains an independent predictor of suboptimal response (OR: 6.99; 95% CI 1.035-47.274). Group 1 (b = -12.72; 95% CI -20.9 to -4.55) and BMI (b = -0.25; 95% CI -0.5 to -0.004) were negatively associated with oocyte yield rate. Patients with low basal LH but high LH max levels had similar clinical outcomes compared to those with high LH max levels through COS. Conclusions: The maximum LH level during COS may serve as an indicator of LH reserve and could be a more reliable predictor of achieving an optimal oocyte yield when compared to relying solely on the basal LH level. In the case of hyper-responders where trigger agents (agonist-only or dual trigger) are being considered, we propose a novel strategy that incorporates the maximum LH level, rather than just the basal or trigger-day LH level, as a reference for assessing LH reserve. This approach aims to minimize the risk of obtaining suboptimal oocyte yield and improve overall treatment outcomes.

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval.

PURPOSE: For poor ovarian responders (PORs), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist was commonly used for prevention of premature LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) over the past two decades. The application of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) recently increased, but the role of PPOS for PORs was uncertain. We aimed to analyze the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and the outcome of oocyte retrieval among PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol for PORs. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study, which enrolled the PORs (defined by the Bologna criteria) undergoing COS with PPOS or flexible GnRH antagonist protocol during January 2018 to December 2021. We compared the incidence of premature LH surge (LH > 10 mIU/mL) and the outcome of oocyte retrieval between the PPOS group and the GnRH antagonist group. RESULTS: A total of 314 women were recruited, with 54 in the PPOS group and 260 in the GnRH antagonist group. The PPOS group had lower incidence of premature LH surges compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol group (5.6% vs 16.9%, P value 0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (3.4 vs 3.8, P value 0.066) and oocyte retrieval rates (88.9% vs 88.0%, P value 0.711). CONCLUSION: Compared with PPOS, GnRH antagonist protocol had higher risk of premature LH surges for PORs but may not affect pregnancy rates. PPOS is suitable for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, but should not totally replace GnRH antagonist protocol for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Clinical use of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone compared with vaginal progesterone as luteal support in in vitro fertilization: A randomized controlled study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy, tolerability and patient satisfaction between aqueous subcutaneous progesterone (Prolutex, 25 mg/vial; IBSA) and vaginal progesterone (Crinone, 90 mg/tube; Merck) as luteal support for fresh embryo transfers in in-vitro fertilization (IVF). MATERIALS & METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 65 patients who underwent IVF were recruited and randomly assigned to either the Prolutex (25 mg daily, n = 33) or Crinone (90 mg daily, n = 32) group. The luteal support regimens were given daily, starting from two days after oocyte pickup. If the serum pregnancy test was positive, luteal support was continued until 7 weeks of gestation. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and serum progesterone level at the mid-luteal phase and at 4 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were drug tolerability and patient satisfaction assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates (Prolutex 25.0% versus Crinone 33.3%, p = 0.699), serum progesterone levels and patient satisfaction between Prolutex and Crinone group. Although the patients that had received Prolutex complained of more local pain at the injection sites, they also had less annoying vaginal discharges and vulvar discomforts. CONCLUSION: Prolutex is of comparable efficacy and patient satisfaction to Crinone, and its availability means patients have more options in regards to the routes of progesterone administration as luteal phase support during IVF.

Rare clinical manifestations of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma presenting as colorectal cancer: A report of two cases.

OBJECTIVE: To report two cases of for primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) to present with gastrointestinal manifestations that mimic colorectal cancer. CASE REPORT: There were two patients with initial presentations of fatigue with iron deficiency anemia, and tenesmus with bloody stool. Tumors of the ascending colon and rectum were detected by colonofiberoscope, and pathologic reports of tumor biopsies revealed adenocarcinoma of suspected gynecologic origin. Both patients underwent optimal debulking surgery without macroscopic residual tumor, and then received adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: PPSC can clinically present like primary colorectal carcinoma. The differential diagnosis requires special staining of several markers for tumor tissues.