CT-Based Radiomic Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Tumor Invasiveness in Lung Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Pure Ground-Glass Nodule.

It remains a challenge to preoperatively forecast whether lung pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) have invasive components. We aimed to construct a radiomic model using tumor characteristics to predict the histologic subtype associated with pGGNs. We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic features of pGGNs resected in 338 patients with lung adenocarcinoma between 2011-2016 at a single institution. A radiomic prediction model based on forward sequential selection and logistic regression was constructed to differentiate adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from invasive adenocarcinoma. The study cohort included 133 (39.4%), 128 (37.9%), and 77 (22.8%) patients with AIS, MIA, and invasive adenocarcinoma (acinar 55.8%, lepidic 33.8%, papillary 10.4%), respectively. The majority (83.7%) underwent sublobar resection. There were no nodal metastases or tumor recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 78 months. Three radiomic features-cluster shade, homogeneity, and run-length variance-were identified as predictors of histologic subtype and were selected to construct a prediction model to classify the AIS/MIA and invasive adenocarcinoma groups. The model achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 70.6%, 75.0%, 70.0%, and 0.7676, respectively. Applying the developed radiomic feature model to predict the histologic subtypes of pGGNs observed on CT scans can help clinically in the treatment selection process.

Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection Versus Segmentectomy for cT1N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The choice between wedge resection and segmentectomy as a sublobar resection method for patients with cT1N0 lung cancer remains debatable. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after wedge resection and segmentectomy for patients with cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The study enrolled 1002 consecutive patients with cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resection at the authors' institution between 2011 and 2017. A propensity score-matching analysis was used to compared the clinical outcomes between the wedge resection and segmentectomy groups. RESULTS: Wedge resection was performed for 810 patients (80.8%), and segmentectomy was performed for 192 patients (19.2%). Wedge resection resulted in better perioperative outcomes than segmentectomy. The multivariate analysis showed that the significant risk factors for poor disease-free survival (DFS) were elevated preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, total tumor diameter greater than 2 cm, and a consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio higher than 50%. After propensity-matching, no differences in overall survival or DFS were noted between the two matched groups. However, subgroup analysis showed that segmentectomy was associated with better DFS than wedge resection (p = 0.039) for the patients with a tumor diameter greater than 2 cm and a C/T ratio higher than 50%. CONCLUSION: Segmentectomy is the appropriate surgical method for sublobar resection in cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma patients with a tumor diameter greater than 2 cm and a C/T ratio higher than 50%. Wedge resection may be a safe and feasible sublobar resection method for patients with a tumor diameter of 2 cm or smaller or a C/T ratio of 50% or lower.