Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 9(3): 203-6, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17298616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The publication of the BSG guidelines in 2002 provided a framework for the follow up of patients with colorectal polyps. The aim of the present study was to determine whether they had, or were being correctly adhered to in a moderately sized District General Hospital. METHOD: A total of 598 patients were on the waiting list for colonoscopy at Airedale General Hospital (AGH) in February 2005. Of these, 203 were being followed up as a result of the previous finding of a polyp. RESULTS: Only 14.8% of patients had been or were being followed up according to the BSG guidelines. The majority of the 85.2% of patients who did not comply with follow up did so as a result of over investigation. Seventy-eight per cent of the low-risk group and 55% of the intermediate-risk group had been colonoscoped, or were waiting to have colonoscopy, too soon or too frequently according to the BSG guidelines. Twenty-four patients with hyperplastic polyps were being followed up incorrectly, as were 17 patients discovered to have a polyp pathology on flexible sigmoidoscopy. It was established that 131 extra colonoscopies had been, or were planned to be performed unnecessarily. CONCLUSION: These data have major implications with regard to patient safety, service provision and cost to the NHS.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/standards , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, District , Humans , Patient Compliance , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom , Unnecessary Procedures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...