Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 85
Filter
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 16(11): 755-62, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11722690

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare patient satisfaction with care in resident and attending physician internal medicine ambulatory care clinics. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire derived from the Visit-Specific Satisfaction Questionnaire (VSQ) and Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI) distributed from March 1998 to May 1998. SETTING: Four clinics based at a university teaching hospital and the associated Veterans' Affairs (VA) hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-eight patients of 76 resident and 25 attending physicians. RESULTS: Patients of resident physicians at the university site were more likely to be African American, male, have lower socioeconomic status and have lower physical and mental health scores on the Short Form-12 than patients of university attendings. Patients of resident and attending physicians at the VA site were similar. In multivariate analyses, patients of university attending physicians were more likely to be highly satisfied than patients of university residents on the VSQ-Physician (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 7.8) and the PSI-Physician (OR, 10.1; 95% CI, 3.7 to 27.4) summary scores. Differences were not seen on the summary scores at the VA site. Two individual items displayed significant differences between residents and attendings at both sites: "personal manner (courtesy, respect, sensitivity, friendliness) of the doctor" (P

Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Medical Staff, Hospital , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Patient Satisfaction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Health Status , Hospitals, Teaching , Hospitals, Veterans , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physician-Patient Relations , Social Class , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 16(9): 590-8, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11556939

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with the use of arterial blood gas (ABG) and pulse oximetry (PO) in the initial management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and arterial hypoxemia at presentation. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 944 outpatients and 1,332 inpatients with clinical and radiographic evidence of CAP prospectively enrolled from 5 study sites in the United States and Canada. ANALYSES: Separate multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to 1) compare measurement of ABG and PO within 48 hours of presentation across sites while controlling for patient differences, and 2) identify factors associated with arterial hypoxemia (PaO2 <60 mm Hg or SaO2 <90% for non-African Americans and <92% for African Americans) while breathing room air. RESULTS: Range of ABG use by site was from 0% to 6.4% (P =.06) for outpatients and from 49.2% to 77.3% for inpatients (P <.001), while PO use ranged from 9.4% to 57.8% for outpatients (P <.001) and from 47.9% to 85.1% for inpatients (P <.001). Differences among sites remained after controlling for patient demographic characteristics, comorbidity, and illness severity. In patients with 1 or more measurements of oxygenation at presentation, hypoxemia was independently associated with 6 risk factors: age >30 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 5.9), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.6), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1), respiratory rate >24 per minute (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.0), altered mental status (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3), and chest radiographic infiltrate involving >1 lobe (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 2.9). The prevalence of hypoxemia among those tested ranged from 13% for inpatients with no risk factors to 54.6% for inpatients with > or =3 risk factors. Of the 210 outpatients who had > or =2 of these risk factors, only 64 (30.5%) had either an ABG or PO performed. In the 48 outpatients tested without supplemental O2 with > or =2 risk factors 8.3% were hypoxemic. CONCLUSIONS: In the initial management of CAP, use of ABG and PO varied widely across sites. Increasing the assessment of arterial oxygenation among patients with CAP is likely to increase the detection of arterial hypoxemia, particularly among outpatients.


Subject(s)
Hypoxia/blood , Pneumonia/blood , Adult , Aged , Blood Gas Analysis/adverse effects , Community-Acquired Infections/blood , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Hypoxia/therapy , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Oximetry/adverse effects , Pneumonia/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Risk Factors
3.
Med Clin North Am ; 85(2): 423-56, xi, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11233954

ABSTRACT

This article focuses on the evaluation of patients with syncope, a symptom not a disease. Syncope is a transient loss of consciousness associated with loss of postural tone with spontaneous recovery. The authors discuss the utility of an indications for different diagnostic tests, the indications for hospital admission, and the management of patients with certain known causes of syncope, including vasovagal and arrhythmic.


Subject(s)
Syncope/diagnosis , Syncope/therapy , Algorithms , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular , Electroencephalography , Hospitalization , Humans , Prognosis , Psychological Tests , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Syncope/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Arch Intern Med ; 161(2): 189-97, 2001 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11176732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inadequate treatments are reported for depressed patients cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs). Providing feedback and evidence-based treatment recommendations for depression to PCPs via electronic medical record improves the quality of interventions. METHODS: Patients presenting to an urban academically affiliated primary care practice were screened for major depression with the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD). During 20-month period, 212 patients met protocol-eligibility criteria and completed a baseline interview. They were cared for by 16 board-certified internists, who were electronically informed of their patients' diagnoses, and randomized to 1 of 3 methods of exposure to guideline-based advice for treating depression (active, passive, and usual care). Ensuing treatment patterns were assessed by medical chart review and by patient self-report at baseline and 3 months. RESULTS: Median time for PCP response to the electronic message regarding the patient's depression diagnosis was 1 day (range, 1-95 days). Three days after notification, 120 (65%) of 186 PCP responses indicated agreement with the diagnosis, 24 (13%) indicated disagreement, and 42 (23%) indicated uncertainty. Primary care physicians who agreed with the diagnoses sooner were more likely to make a medical chart notation of depression, begin antidepressant medication therapy, or refer to a mental health specialist (P<.001). There were no differences in the agreement rate or treatments provided across guideline exposure conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic feedback of the diagnosis of major depression can affect PCP initial management of the disorder. Further study is necessary to determine whether this strategy, combined with delivery of treatment recommendations, can improve clinical outcomes in routine practice.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Physicians, Family , Adolescent , Adult , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Internal Medicine , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Am J Med ; 109(5): 378-85, 2000 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11020394

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with pneumonia often remain hospitalized after becoming clinically stable, without demonstrated benefits on outcome. The purposes of this study were to assess the relation between length of hospital stay and daily medical care costs and to estimate the potential cost savings associated with a reduced length of stay for patients with pneumonia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: As part of a prospective study of adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia at a community hospital and two university teaching hospitals, daily medical care costs were estimated by multiplying individual charges by department-specific cost-to-charge ratios obtained from each hospital's Medicare cost reports. RESULTS: The median total cost of hospitalization for all 982 inpatients was $5, 942, with a median daily cost of $836, including $491 (59%) for room and $345 (41%) for non-room costs. Average daily non-room costs were 282% greater on the first hospital day, 59% greater on the second day, and 19% greater on the third day than the average daily cost throughout the hospitalization (all P <0.05), and were 14% to 72% lower on the last 3 days of hospitalization. Average daily room costs remained relatively constant throughout the hospital stay, with the exception of the day of discharge. A projected mean savings of $680 was associated with a 1-day reduction in length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Despite institutional differences in total costs, patterns of daily resource use throughout hospitalization were similar at all institutions. A 1-day reduction in length of stay might yield substantial cost-savings.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Pneumonia/economics , Adult , Aged , Boston , Cohort Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/economics , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nova Scotia , Pennsylvania , Process Assessment, Health Care , Severity of Illness Index
7.
J Gen Intern Med ; 15(9): 638-46, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11029678

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the presentation, resolution of symptoms, processes of care, and outcomes of pneumococcal pneumonia, and to compare features of the bacteremic and nonbacteremic forms of this illness. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five medical institutions in 3 geographic locations. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients and outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics, respiratory and nonrespiratory symptoms, and physical examination findings were obtained from interviews or chart review. Severity of illness was assessed using a validated prediction rule for short-term mortality in CAP. Pneumococcal pneumonia was categorized as bacteremic; nonbacteremic, pure etiology; or nonbacteremic, mixed etiology. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight (6.9%) of 2,287 patients (944 outpatients, 1,343 inpatients) with CAP had pneumococcal pneumonia. Sixty-five (41%) of the 158 with pneumococcal pneumonia were bacteremic; 74 (47%) were nonbacteremic with S. pneumoniae as sole pathogen; and 19 (12%) were nonbacteremic with S. pneumoniae as one of multiple pathogens. The pneumococcal bacteremia rate for outpatients was 2.6% and for inpatients it was 6.6%. Cough, dyspnea, and pleuritic pain were common respiratory symptoms. Hemoptysis occurred in 16% to 22% of the patients. A large number of nonrespiratory symptoms were noted. Bacteremic patients were less likely than nonbacteremic patients to have sputum production and myalgias (60% vs 82% and 33% vs 57%, respectively; P <.01 for both), more likely to have elevated blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels, and more likely to receive penicillin therapy. Half of bacteremic patients were in the low risk category for short-term mortality (groups I to III), similar to the nonbacteremic patients. None of the 32 bacteremic patients in risk groups I to III died, while 7 of 23 (30%) in risk group V died. Intensive care unit admissions and pneumonia-related mortality were similar between bacteremic and nonbacteremic groups, although 46% of the bacteremic group had respiratory failure compared with 32% and 37% for the other groups. The nonbacteremic pure etiology patients returned to household activities faster than bacteremic patients. Symptoms frequently persisted at 30 days: cough (50%); dyspnea (53%); sputum production (48%); pleuritic pain (13%); and fatigue (63%). CONCLUSIONS: There were few differences in the presentation of bacteremic and nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. About half of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia patients were at low risk for mortality. Symptom resolution frequently was slow.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Pneumococcal , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/microbiology , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/mortality , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
8.
Am J Med ; 107(1): 5-12, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10403346

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the variation in length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia and to determine whether patients who are treated in hospitals with shorter mean stays have worse medical outcomes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied a cohort of 1,188 adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia who had been admitted to one community and three university teaching hospitals. We compared patients' mean length of stay, mortality, hospital readmission, return to usual activities, return to work, and pneumonia-related symptoms among the four study hospitals. All outcomes were adjusted for baseline differences in severity of illness and comorbidity. RESULTS: Adjusted interhospital differences in mean length of stay ranged from 0.9 to 2.3 days (P <0.001). When the risk of each medical outcome was compared between patients admitted to the hospital with the shortest length of stay and those admitted to longer stay hospitals, there were no differences in mortality [relative risk (RR) = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.7], hospital readmission (RR = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2), return to usual activities (RR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.3), or return to work (RR = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.0) during the first 14 days after discharge, or in the mean number of pneumonia-related symptoms 30 days after admission (P = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: We observed substantial interhospital variation in the lengths of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. The finding that medical outcomes were similar in patients admitted to the hospital with the shortest length of stay and those admitted to hospitals with longer mean lengths of stay suggests that hospitals with longer stays may be able to reduce the mean duration of hospitalization for this disease without adversely affecting patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Boston , Community-Acquired Infections/complications , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nova Scotia , Pennsylvania , Pneumonia/complications , Prospective Studies , Risk , Risk Factors
9.
Arch Intern Med ; 159(9): 970-80, 1999 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10326939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although understanding the processes of care and medical outcomes for patients with community-acquired pneumonia is instrumental to improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of care for this illness, limited information is available on how physicians manage patients with this illness or on medical outcomes other than short-term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To describe the processes of care and to assess a broad range of medical outcomes for ambulatory and hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted at 4 hospitals and 1 health maintenance organization in Pittsburgh, Pa, Boston, Mass, and Halifax, Nova Scotia. Data were collected via patient interviews and reviews of medical records for 944 outpatients and 1343 inpatients with clinical and radiographic evidence of community-acquired pneumonia. Processes of care and medical outcomes were assessed 30 days after presentation. RESULTS: Only 29.7% of outpatients had 1 or more microbiologic tests performed, and only 5.7% had an assigned microbiologic cause. Although 95.7% of inpatients had 1 or more microbiologic tests performed, a cause was established in only 29.6%. Six outpatients (0.6%) died, and 3 of these deaths were pneumonia related. Of surviving outpatients, 8.0% had 1 or more medical complications. At 30 days, 88.9% (nonemployed) to 95.6% (employed) of the surviving outpatients had returned to usual activities, yet 76.0% of outpatients had 1 or more persisting pneumonia-related symptoms. Overall, 107 inpatients (8.0%) died, and 81 of these deaths were pneumonia related. Most surviving inpatients (69.0%) had 1 or more medical complications. At 30 days, 57.3% (non-employed) to 82.0% (employed) of surviving inpatients had returned to usual activities, and 86.1% had 1 or more persisting pneumonia-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, conducted primarily at hospital sites with affiliated medical education training programs, virtually all outpatients and most inpatients had pneumonia of unknown cause. Although outpatients had an excellent prognosis, pneumonia-related symptoms often persisted at 30 days. Inpatients had substantial mortality, morbidity, and pneumonia-related symptoms at 30 days.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Pneumonia/therapy , Adult , Aged , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/microbiology , Pneumonia/mortality , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Arch Intern Med ; 159(4): 375-80, 1999 Feb 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10030311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with syncope frequently present with multitude of other symptoms but their significance in predicting morbidity or mortality has not been previously studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine if certain symptoms can be used to identify syncope patients at risk for cardiac arrhythmias, mortality, or recurrence of syncope. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1987 to February 1991, we prospectively evaluated patients with syncope from outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department services of a university medical center. These patients were interviewed, charts were reviewed, and detailed information on 19 symptoms and comorbidities was obtained. A cause of syncope was assigned using standardized diagnostic criteria. All patients were followed up at 3-month intervals for at least 1 year for recurrence of syncope and mortality. Patients in whom the cause of syncope was determined by medical history and physical examination alone were not included in our analysis. RESULTS: History and physical examination led to the cause of syncope in 222 of 497 patients enrolled. In the remaining 275 patients, the absence of nausea and vomiting before syncope (odds ratio, 7.1) and electrocardiographic abnormalities (odds ratio, 23.5) were predictors of arrhythmic syncope. Underlying cardiac disease was the only predictor of 1-year mortality. No symptom remained as independent predictor for 1-year mortality or syncope recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms, although important in assigning many noncardiac causes, are not useful in risk-stratifying patients whose cause of syncope cannot be identified by other history and physical examination. Triage decisions and management plans should be based on pre-existing cardiac disease or electrocardiographic abnormalities, which are important predictors of arrhythmic syncope and mortality.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Syncope/complications , Syncope/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Recurrence , Risk
11.
Am J Med Sci ; 317(2): 110-6, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10037114

ABSTRACT

Upright tilt testing is commonly used in the evaluation of patients with syncope to provoke hypotension and/or bradycardia in the laboratory. The most common type of response is provocation of neurally mediated syndrome (vasovagal syncope). The American College of Cardiology Expert Consensus has proposed indications for tilt testing. The most common indication is recurrent syncope of unexplained cause. Upright tilt testing methods have not been standardized. The most common protocols in this country use a tilt angle of 60-80 degrees and use isoproterenol infusion after a period of drug-free tilt testing. The sensitivity of upright tilt testing is estimated to be 67-83%, and the specificity is between 75 and 100%. The reproducibility of the test has been variable. In patients with unexplained syncope, positive responses are found to be 50% without the use of isoproterenol and 64% with the use of isoproterenol. Many different treatments have been used. At this time, there is no consensus regarding the most effective treatment. Beta-blockers and fludrocortisone plus salt are the most commonly used drugs. Pacemakers have been used, but their role is ill-defined at this time.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Syncope/etiology , Syncope/physiopathology , Tilt-Table Test , Adrenergic beta-Agonists , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Isoproterenol , Sensitivity and Specificity , Syncope/diagnosis , Tilt-Table Test/methods
12.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 29(3): 267-86, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10642902

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Using the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Depression Guideline Panel's recommendations as its focus, this article describes a step-by-step approach for disseminating a paper-based depression guideline to primary care physicians via a commercially available electronic medical record (EMR) system. METHOD: Description of the author's approach to disseminate an evidence-based depression treatment guideline to a group of primary care physicians using a commercially available EMR system and to evaluate the results. RESULTS: We review clinical considerations and practical barriers faced in this process with the expectation that our experiences can guide others attempting to disseminate psychiatric treatment guideline via EMR systems. CONCLUSIONS: The EMR offers critical efficiencies in disseminating state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines and in directing the primary care physicians' use of them. Still, well-designed, randomized controlled trials are necessary to demonstrate their effectiveness at enhancing patient outcomes for major depression in primary care settings.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Computer Communication Networks/statistics & numerical data , Depression , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/standards , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/therapy , Humans , Pennsylvania , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
13.
Med Care ; 36(7): 977-87, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9674616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The authors describe the relation of provider characteristics to processes, costs, and outcomes of medical care for elderly patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: Using Medicare claims data, Medicare beneficiaries discharged from Pennsylvania hospitals during 1990 with community-acquired pneumonia were identified. Claims data were used to ascertain mortality, readmissions, use of procedures and physician consultations, and the costs of care. The relationship of these measures to provider characteristics was analyzed using regression techniques to adjust for patient characteristics, including comorbidity and microbial etiology. RESULTS: Among 22,294 pneumonia episodes studied, 30-day mortality was 17.0%. After adjusting for patient characteristics, 30-day mortality and readmission rates were unrelated to hospital teaching status or urban location or to physician specialty. Use of procedures and physician consultations was more common and costs were 11% higher among patients discharged from teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals. Similarly, costs were 15% higher at urban hospitals compared with rural hospitals. General internists and medical subspecialists used more procedures and had higher costs than family practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Processes and costs of care for community-acquired pneumonia varied by provider characteristics, but neither mortality nor readmission rates did. These differences cannot be explained by clinical variables in the database. Further studies should determine whether less costly patterns of care for pneumonia, and perhaps other conditions, could replace more costly ones without compromising patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/economics , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/classification , Medicine/classification , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pneumonia/economics , Specialization , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Female , Health Services Research , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Reporting/economics , Male , Medicare/economics , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania , United States
14.
JAMA ; 279(18): 1452-7, 1998 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9600479

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Many groups have developed guidelines to shorten hospital length of stay in pneumonia in order to decrease costs, but the length of time until a patient hospitalized with pneumonia becomes clinically stable has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To describe the time to resolution of abnormalities in vital signs, ability to eat, and mental status in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and assess clinical outcomes after achieving stability. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. SETTING: Three university and 1 community teaching hospital in Boston, Mass, Pittsburgh, Pa, and Halifax, Nova Scotia. PATIENTS: Six hundred eighty-six adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to resolution of vital signs, ability to eat, mental status, hospital length of stay, and admission to an intensive care, coronary care, or telemetry unit. RESULTS: The median time to stability was 2 days for heart rate (< or =100 beats/min) and systolic blood pressure (> or =90 mm Hg), and 3 days for respiratory rate (< or =24 breaths/min), oxygen saturation (> or =90%), and temperature (< or =37.2 degrees C [99 degrees F]). The median time to overall clinical stability was 3 days for the most lenient definition of stability and 7 days for the most conservative definition. Patients with more severe cases of pneumonia at presentation took longer to reach stability. Once stability was achieved, clinical deterioration requiring intensive care, coronary care, or telemetry monitoring occurred in 1% of cases or fewer. Between 65% to 86% of patients stayed in the hospital more than 1 day after reaching stability, and fewer than 29% to 46% were converted to oral antibiotics within 1 day of stability, depending on the definition of stability. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimates of time to stability in pneumonia and explicit criteria for defining stability can provide an evidence-based estimate of optimal length of stay, and outline a clinically sensible approach to improving the efficiency of inpatient management.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pneumonia/therapy , Adult , Boston , Cohort Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Female , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nova Scotia , Pennsylvania , Pneumonia/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
15.
Am J Med ; 104(1): 17-27, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9528715

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the patterns of antimicrobial use, costs of antimicrobial therapy, and medical outcomes by institution in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The route, dose, and frequency of administration of all antimicrobial agents prescribed within 30 days of presentation were recorded for 927 outpatients and 1328 inpatients enrolled in the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) multicenter, prospective cohort study. Total antimicrobial costs were estimated by summing drug costs, using average wholesale price for oral agents and institutional acquisition prices for parenteral agents, plus the costs associated with preparation and administration of parenteral therapy. Thirty-day outcome measures were mortality, subsequent hospitalization for outpatients, and hospital readmission for inpatients. RESULTS: Significant variation (P <0.05) in prescribing practices occurred for 17 of the 23 antimicrobial agents used in outpatients across 5 treatment sites, and for 18 of the 20 parenteral agents used in inpatients across 4 treatment sites. The median duration of antimicrobial therapy for treatment site ranged from 11 to 13 days for outpatients (P=0.01), and from 13 to 15 days for inpatients (P=0.49). The overall median cost of antimicrobial therapy was $12.90 for outpatients, and ranged from $10.80 to $58.90 among treatment sites (P <0.0001). The overall median cost of antimicrobial therapy was $228.70 for inpatients, and ranged from $183.70 to $315.60 among sites (P <0.0001). Mortality and hospital readmission for inpatients were not significantly different across sites after adjusting for baseline differences in patient demographic characteristics, comorbidity, and illness severity. Although subsequent hospitalization for outpatients differed by site, the rate was lowest for the site with the lowest antimicrobial costs. CONCLUSION: Variations in antimicrobial prescribing practices by treatment site exist for outpatients and inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. Although variation in antimicrobial prescribing practices across institutions results in significant differences in antimicrobial costs, patients treated at institutions with the lowest antimicrobial costs do not demonstrate worse medical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/economics , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/economics , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia/economics , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission , Pneumonia/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
Ann Emerg Med ; 31(3): 376-80, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9506497

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, causes, and outcomes of patients hospitalized within 30 days of initiating outpatient treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: Patients were enrolled in the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team's multicenter, prospective cohort study of CAP. All hospitalizations within 30 days of study enrollment of patients initially treated as outpatients for CAP were recorded. Two physicians used a set of predetermined definitions to independently categorize the reasons for these subsequent hospitalizations. Thirty-day mortality rate and measures of resolution of pneumonia were assessed. The setting included three university teaching hospitals, a community teaching hospital, and a staff model medical practice within a health maintenance organization. RESULTS: Of the 944 enrollees with CAP initially treated in the outpatient setting, 71 (7.5%) were subsequently hospitalized within 30 days. The reason for subsequent hospitalization was CAP related in 40 patients and comorbidity related in 26 patients; 5 refused an initial offer of hospitalization. Ninety percent of pneumonia-related hospitalizations occurred within 10 days of initial presentation. Patients who were subsequently hospitalized required a median of 14 days to return to usual activities compared with 6 days for those who were not hospitalized (P<.0001). Patients with a subsequent hospitalization had a higher 30-day mortality rate, 4.2% compared with .3% (P<.01). CONCLUSION: A small proportion of patients with CAP initially treated in the outpatient setting are subsequently hospitalized. Such patients face a higher risk of delayed recovery or death. However, the vast majority of outpatients, whether subsequently hospitalized or not, had a successful resolution of their illness. Subsequent hospitalization by 10 days after initial outpatient treatment seems a reasonable screening tool for potentially unsatisfactory quality of care for patients with CAP.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Community-Acquired Infections , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nova Scotia/epidemiology , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/therapy , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Treatment Failure
17.
JAMA ; 278(17): 1440-5, 1997 Nov 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9356004

ABSTRACT

Community-acquired pneumonia is an important cause of acute respiratory symptoms (eg, cough) in the ambulatory care setting. Distinguishing pneumonia from other causes of respiratory illnesses, such as acute bronchitis and upper respiratory tract infections, has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. The reference standard for diagnosing pneumonia is chest radiography, but it is likely that many physicians rely on the patient's history and their physical examination to diagnose or exclude this disease. A review of published studies of patients suspected of having pneumonia reveals that there are no individual clinical findings, or combinations of findings, that can rule in the diagnosis of pneumonia for a patient suspected of having this illness. However, some studies have shown that the absence of any vital sign abnormalities or any abnormalities on chest auscultation substantially reduces the likelihood of pneumonia to a point where further diagnostic evaluation may be unnecessary. This article reviews the literature on the appropriate use of the history and physical examination in diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Physical Examination , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Decision Trees , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Medical History Taking , Pneumonia/physiopathology , Radiography
18.
Arch Intern Med ; 157(13): 1453-9, 1997 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9224224

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advanced age has become a well-recognized risk factor for death in patients with pneumonia. It may also be associated with reduced symptom reporting, raising the possibility that diagnosis and treatment may be delayed in older patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between age and the presenting symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This study was conducted at inpatient and outpatient facilities at 3 university hospitals, 1 community hospital, and 1 staff-model health maintenance organization. Patients included adults (age > or = 18 years) with clinical and radiographic evidence of pneumonia, who were able to complete a baseline interview. The presence of 5 respiratory symptoms and 13 nonrespiratory symptoms were recorded during a baseline patient interview. A summary symptom score was computed as the total number of symptoms at presentation. RESULTS: The 1812 eligible study patients were categorized into 4 age groups: 18 through 44 years (43%), 45 through 64 years (25%), 65 through 74 years (17%), and 75 years or older (15%). For 17 of the 18 symptoms, there were significant decreases in reported prevalence with increasing age (P < .01). In a linear regression analysis, controlling for patient demographics, comorbidity, and severity of illness at presentation, older age remained associated with lower symptom scores (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory and nonrespiratory symptoms are less commonly reported by older patients with pneumonia, even after controlling for the increased comorbidity and illness severity in these older patients. Recognition of this phenomenon by clinicians and patients is essential given the increased mortality in elderly patients with pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Community-Acquired Infections/etiology , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/etiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
19.
J Gen Intern Med ; 12(7): 423-30, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9229281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of resolution of symptoms and return to premorbid health status and assess the association of these outcomes with health care utilization in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient facilities at three university hospitals, one community hospital, and one staff-model health maintenance organization. PATIENTS: Five hundred seventy-six adults (aged > or = 18 years) with clinical and radiographic evidence of pneumonia, judged by a validated pneumonia severity index to be at low risk of dying. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The presence and severity of five symptoms (cough, fatigue, dyspnea, sputum, and chest pain) were recorded through questionnaires administered at four time points: 0, 7, 30, and 90 days from the time of radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia. A summary symptom score was tabulated as the sum of the five individual severity scores. Patients also provided responses to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and reported the number of and reason for outpatient physician visits. Symptoms and health status 30 days before pneumonia onset (prepneumonia) were obtained at the initial interview. All symptoms, except pleuritic chest pain, were still commonly reported at 30 days, and the prevalence of each symptom at 90 days was still nearly twice prepneumonia levels. Physical health measures derived from the SF-36 Form declined significantly at presentation but continued to improve over all three follow-up time periods. Patients with elevated symptom scores at day 7 or day 30 were significantly more likely to report pneumonia-related ambulatory care visits at the subsequent day 30 or day 90 interviews, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-specific symptom resolution and recovery of the premorbid physical health status requires more than 30 days for many patients with pneumonia. Delayed resolution of symptoms is associated with increased utilization of outpatient physician visits.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Pneumonia/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Aged , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/physiopathology , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Health Status , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nova Scotia , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/physiopathology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
20.
Ann Intern Med ; 127(1): 76-86, 1997 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9214258

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To review the literature on diagnostic testing in syncope that remains unexplained after initial clinical assessment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search. STUDY SELECTION: Published papers were selected if they addressed diagnostic testing in syncope, near syncope, or dizziness. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were identified as population studies, referral studies, or case series. DATA SYNTHESIS: After a thorough history, physical examination, and electrocardiography, the cause of syncope remains undiagnosed in 50% of patients. In such patients, information may be derived from the results of carefully selected diagnostic tests, especially 1) electrophysiologic studies in patients with organic heart disease, 2) Holter monitoring or telemetry in patients known to have or suspected of having heart disease, 3) loop monitoring in patients with frequent events and normal hearts, 4) psychiatric evaluation in patients with frequent events and no injury, and 5) tilt-table testing in patients who have infrequent events or in whom vasovagal syncope is suspected. Hospitalization is indicated for high-risk patients, especially those with known heart disease and elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: A flexible, focused approach is required to diagnose syncope. Features of the initial history and physical examination help guide diagnostic testing.


Subject(s)
Syncope/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/methods , Electrophysiology , Exercise Test , Heart Diseases/complications , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Syncope/psychology , Tilt-Table Test
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...