Does quantification of [11C]meta-hydroxyephedrine and [13N]ammonia kinetics improve risk stratification in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, cardiac sympathetic nervous system dysfunction is a predictor of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). This study compared abnormal innervation and perfusion measured by [11C]meta-hydroxyephedrine (HED) vs [13N]ammonia (NH3), conventional uptake vs parametric tracer analysis, and their SCA risk discrimination. METHODS: This is a sub-study analysis of the prospective PAREPET trial, which followed ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%) for events of SCA. Using n = 174 paired dynamic HED and NH3 positron emission tomography (PET) scans, regional defect scores (%LV extent × severity) were calculated using HED and NH3 uptake, as well as HED distribution volume and NH3 myocardial blood flow by kinetic modeling. RESULTS: During 4.1 years follow-up, there were 27 SCA events. HED defects were larger than NH3, especially in the lowest tertile of perfusion abnormality (P < .001). Parametric defects were larger than their respective tracer uptake defects (P < .001). SCA risk discrimination was not significantly improved with parametric or uptake mismatch (AUC = 0.73 or 0.70) compared to HED uptake defect scores (AUC = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Quantification of HED distribution volume and NH3 myocardial blood flow produced larger defects than their respective measures of tracer uptake, but did not lead to improved SCA risk stratification vs HED uptake alone.

Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurement provides incremental diagnostic and prognostic information. The objective of the current study was to investigate the application of a simplified model for the estimation of MFR using only the stress/rest myocardial activity ratio (MAR) in patients undergoing rest-stress cardiac PET MPI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rest and dipyridamole stress dynamic PET imaging was performed in consecutive patients using 82Rb or 13NH3 (n = 250 each). Reference standard MFR was quantified using a standard one-tissue compartment model. Stress/rest myocardial activity ratio (MAR) was calculated using the LV-mean activity from 2 to 6 minutes post-injection. Simplified estimates of MFR (MFREST) were then calculated using an inverse power function. For 13NH3, there was good correlation between MFR and MFREST values (R = 0.63), with similar results for 82Rb (R = 0.73). There was no bias in the MFREST values with either tracer. The overall diagnostic performance of MFREST for detection of MFR < 2 was good with ROC area under the curve (AUC) = 83.2 ± 1.2% for 13NH3 and AUC = 90.4 ± 0.7% for 82Rb. CONCLUSION: MFR was estimated with good accuracy using 82Rb and 13NH3 with a simplified method that relies only on stress/rest activity ratios. This novel approach does not require dynamic imaging or tracer kinetic modeling. It may be useful for routine quality assurance of PET MFR measurements, or in scanners where full dynamic imaging and tracer kinetic modeling is not feasible for technical or logistical reasons.

Reproducible Quantification of Regional Sympathetic Denervation with [11C]meta-Hydroxyephedrine PET Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Regional cardiac sympathetic denervation is predictive of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The reproducibility of denervation scores between automated software programs has not been evaluated. This study seeks to (1) compare the inter-rater reliability of regional denervation measurements using two analysis programs: FlowQuant® and Corridor4DM®; (2) evaluate test-retest repeatability of regional denervation scores. METHODS: N = 190 dynamic [11C]meta-hydroxyephedrine (HED) PET scans were reviewed from the PAREPET trial in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF ≤ 35%). N = 12 scans were excluded due to non-diagnostic quality. N = 178 scans were analyzed using FlowQuant and Corridor4DM software, each by two observers. Test-retest scans from N = 20 patients with stable heart failure were utilized for test-retest analysis. Denervation scores were defined as extent × severity of relative uptake defects in LV regions with < 75% of maximal uptake. Results were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability (RPC). RESULTS: Inter-observer, inter-software, and test-retest ICC values were excellent (ICC = 94% to 99%) and measurement variability was small (RPC < 11%). Mean differences between observers ranged .2% to 1.1% for Corridor4DM (P = .28), FlowQuant (P < .001), and between software programs (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated HED scores from both programs were predictive of SCA. CONCLUSION: Inter-rater reliability for both analysis programs was excellent and test-retest repeatability was consistent. The minimal difference in scores between FlowQuant and Corridor4DM supports their use in future trials.

Reliable quantification of myocardial sympathetic innervation and regional denervation using [11C]meta-hydroxyephedrine PET.

PURPOSE: Cardiac sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure patients. This study characterized the reproducibility and repeatability of [11C]meta-hydroxyephedrine (HED) positron emission tomography (PET) quantification of cardiac SNS innervation, regional denervation, and myocardial blood flow (MBF). METHODS: Dynamic HED PET-CT scans were performed 47 ± 22 days apart in 20 patients with stable heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Three observers, blinded to clinical data, used FlowQuant® to evaluate the test-retest repeatability and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of HED tracer uptake and clearance rates to measure global (LV-mean) retention index (RI), volume of distribution (VT), and MBF. Values were also compared with and without regional partial-volume correction. Regional denervation was quantified as %LV defect size of values < 75% of the LV-maximum. Test-retest repeatability and observer reproducibility were evaluated using intra-class-correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability (NPC). RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer correlations of both VT and RI were excellent (ICC = 0.93-0.99). Observer reproducibility (NPC = 3-13%) was lower than test-retest repeatability (NPC = 12-61%). Both regional (%LV defect size) and global (LV-mean) measures of sympathetic innervation were more repeatable using the simple RI model compared to VT (NPC = 12% vs. 19% and 30% vs. 54%). Using either model, quantification of regional denervation (defect size) was consistently more reliable than the global LV-mean values of RI or VT. Regional partial-volume correction degraded repeatability of both the global and regional VT measures by 2-12%. Test-retest repeatability of MBF estimation was relatively poor (NPC = 30-61%) compared with the RI. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of global and regional SNS innervation were most repeatable using the simple RI method of analysis compared with the more complex VT. Observer variability was significantly lower than the test-retest repeatability using a highly automated analysis program. These results support the use of the simple RI method for reliable analysis of HED PET images in clinical research studies for future evaluation of new therapies and for risk stratification in patients with heart failure.