ABSTRACT
Background: Anemia is the most common nutritional disease in pregnancy with significant adverse maternofetal outcome. The objective of the present study is to study the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the pregnancy outcomes of women with severe anemia. Methodology: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at LHMC and SSK Hospital, Delhi. The study included all antenatal women admitted at a gestational age of >26 weeks (third trimester) with severe anemia and hemoglobin level of 7 g/dL. In our study, a total of 4031 women were included as cases during study period (July to December 2022) and 6659 women as controls from pre-COVID-19 period (July to December 2019). Results: In present study, a total of 4031 women delivered during study period as compared to 6659 in control period. In the present study, the prevalence of anemia was observed to be 74.7% in the study group and 51.6% in the control group (P < 0.001). Mean hemoglobin level was significantly lower in study group as compared to the control groups P<0.05. Microcytic hypochromic anemia was the most common morphological type of anemia in both groups. Serum ferritin, serum iron, serum B12, and folic acid levels among cases were significantly (P < 0.05) lower as compared to controls. Odds of fetal growth restriction were 1.4 times higher among study group as compared to control groups. The odds of newborn complications such as low birth weight were 2.49 (95% CI: 1.04-5.91) and need for nursery or NICU admission were 4.84 times (95% CI: 0.48-48.24) higher in cases as compared to controls. Low birth rate was higher in cases and was found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic had indirect impact on adverse maternal and fetal outcome in women with severe anemia.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Close monitoring of patients in the first 2 hours after cesarean delivery (CD) is crucial. Delays in shifting of the post-CD patients led to a chaotic environment in the postoperative ward, suboptimal monitoring, and inadequate nursing care. Our aim was to increase the percentage of post-CD patients shifted from transfer trolley to bed within 10 minutes of arrival in the postoperative ward from a baseline of 64% to 100%, and to maintain that rate for more than 3 weeks. METHODS: A quality improvement team including physicians, nurses, and workers was constituted. Problem analysis revealed lack of communication among the caregivers as the main cause of delay. The percentage of post-CD patients shifted from trolley to bed within 10 minutes of being wheeled into the postoperative ward out of the total number of post-CD patients transferred from the operation theater to the postoperative ward was taken as the outcome indicator for the project. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles based on the Point of Care Quality Improvement methodology were undertaken to achieve the target. Main interventions were: 1) written information of patient being transferred to operation theater for CD sent to the postoperative ward; 2) stationing of a duty doctor in the postoperative ward; and 3) keeping a buffer of 1 vacant bed in the postoperative ward. The data were plotted weekly as a dynamic time series chart and signals of change were observed. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent (172 out of 206) of women were shifted in time by 3 weeks. After Plan-Do-Study-Act 4, the percentages kept improving leading to a median shift from 85.6% to 100% after 10 weeks post-initiation of the project. Sustainment was confirmed by continuing observations for 6 more weeks to ensure that the changed protocol was assimilated in the system. We found that all women were shifted within 10 minutes of their arrival in postoperative ward from trolley to bed. CONCLUSION: Providing high-quality care to patients must be a priority for all health care providers. High-quality care is timely, efficient, evidence based, and patient-centric. Delays in transfer of postoperative patients to the monitoring area can be detrimental. The point of Care Quality Improvement methodology is useful and effective in solving complex problems by understanding and fixing the various contributory factors one by one. Reorganization of processes and available manpower without any extra investment in terms of infrastructure and resources is pivotal for long term success of a quality improvement project.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Quality Improvement , Humans , Female , Quality of Health Care , PatientsABSTRACT
A single undiagnosed COVID-19 positive patient admitted in the green zone has the potential to infect many Health Care Workers (HCWs) and other patients at any given time with resultant spread of infection and reduction in the available workforce. Despite the existing triaging strategy at the Obstetric unit of a tertiary hospital in New Delhi, where all COVID-19 suspects obstetric patients were tested and admitted in orange zone and non-suspects in green zone, asymptomatic COVID-19 positive patients were found admitted in the green zone. This was the trigger to undertake a quality improvement (QI) initiative to prevent the admission of asymptomatic COVID-19 positive patients in green zones. The QI project aimed at reducing the admission of COVID-19 positive patients in the green zone of the unit from 20% to 10% in 4 weeks' time starting 13/6/2020 by means of dynamic triaging. A COVID-19 action team was made and after an initial analysis of the problem multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were run to test the change ideas. The main change ideas were revised testing strategies and creating gray Zones for patients awaiting COVID-19 test results. The admission of unsuspected COVID-19 positive cases in the green zone of the unit reduced from 20% to 0% during the stipulated period. There was a significant reduction in the number of HCWs, posted in the green zone, being quarantined or test positive for COVID-19 infection as well. The authors conclude that Quality Improvement methods have the potential to develop effective strategies to prevent spread of the deadly Corona virus.