Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Molecules ; 28(23)2023 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38067494

ABSTRACT

Opioid receptor agonists, particularly those that activate µ-opioid receptors (MORs), are essential analgesic agents for acute or chronic mild to severe pain treatment. However, their use has raised concerns including, among others, intestinal dysbiosis. In addition, growing data on constipation-evoked intestinal dysbiosis have been reported. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) creates an obstacle to continuing treatment with opioid analgesics. When non-opioid therapies fail to overcome the OIC, opioid antagonists with peripheral, fast first-pass metabolism, and gastrointestinal localized effects remain the drug of choice for OIC, which are discussed here. At first glance, their use seems to only be restricted to constipation, however, recent data on OIC-related dysbiosis and its contribution to the appearance of several opioid side effects has garnered a great of attention from researchers. Peripheral MORs have also been considered as a future target for opioid analgesics with limited central side effects. The properties of MOR antagonists counteracting OIC, and with limited influence on central and possibly peripheral MOR-mediated antinociception, will be highlighted. A new concept is also proposed for developing gut-selective MOR antagonists to treat or restore OIC while keeping peripheral antinociception unaffected. The impact of opioid antagonists on OIC in relation to changes in the gut microbiome is included.


Subject(s)
Narcotic Antagonists , Opioid-Induced Constipation , Humans , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Constipation/chemically induced , Constipation/drug therapy , Constipation/metabolism , Opioid-Induced Constipation/drug therapy , Dysbiosis/chemically induced , Dysbiosis/drug therapy , Receptors, Opioid/metabolism
2.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 16(8)2023 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37631030

ABSTRACT

The current treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) is unsatisfactory; therefore, effective novel agents or combination-based analgesic therapies are needed. Herein, oral tolperisone, pregabalin, and duloxetine were tested for their antinociceptive effect against rat partial sciatic nerve ligation (pSNL)-induced tactile allodynia described by a decrease in the paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) measured by a dynamic plantar aesthesiometer. On day 7 after the operation, PWTs were assessed at 60, 120, and 180 min post-treatment. Chronic treatment was continued for 2 weeks, and again, PWTs were measured on day 14 and 21. None of the test compounds produced an acute antiallodynic effect. In contrast, after chronic treatment, tolperisone and pregabalin alleviated allodynia. In other experiments, on day 14, the acute antiallodynic effect of the tolperisone/pregabalin or duloxetine combination was measured. As a novel finding, a single dose of the tolperisone/pregabalin combination could remarkably alleviate allodynia acutely. It also restored the neuropathy-induced elevated CSF glutamate content. Furthermore, the combination is devoid of adverse effects related to motor and gastrointestinal transit functions. Tolperisone and pregabalin target voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, respectively. The dual blockade effect of the combination might explain its advantageous acute analgesic effect in the present work.

3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(9)2023 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37175678

ABSTRACT

Despite the large arsenal of analgesic medications, neuropathic pain (NP) management is not solved yet. Angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1) has been identified as a potential target in NP therapy. Here, we investigate the antiallodynic effect of AT1 blockers telmisartan and losartan, and particularly their combination with morphine on rat mononeuropathic pain following acute or chronic oral administration. The impact of telmisartan on morphine analgesic tolerance was also assessed using the rat tail-flick assay. Morphine potency and efficacy in spinal cord samples of treated neuropathic animals were assessed by [35S]GTPγS-binding assay. Finally, the glutamate content of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was measured by capillary electrophoresis. Oral telmisartan or losartan in higher doses showed an acute antiallodynic effect. In the chronic treatment study, the combination of subanalgesic doses of telmisartan and morphine ameliorated allodynia and resulted in a leftward shift in the dose-response curve of morphine in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay and increased CSF glutamate content. Telmisartan delayed morphine analgesic-tolerance development. Our study has identified a promising combination therapy composed of telmisartan and morphine for NP and opioid tolerance. Since telmisartan is an inhibitor of AT1 and activator of PPAR-γ, future studies are needed to analyze the effect of each component.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Neuralgia , Rats , Animals , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Telmisartan/pharmacology , Telmisartan/therapeutic use , Losartan/therapeutic use , Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate) , Drug Tolerance , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Morphine/pharmacology , Morphine/therapeutic use , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Glutamates/therapeutic use
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(17)2022 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36076962

ABSTRACT

Current treatment approaches to manage neuropathic pain have a slow onset and their use is largely hampered by side-effects, thus there is a significant need for finding new medications. Tolperisone, a centrally acting muscle relaxant with a favorable side effect profile, has been reported to affect ion channels, which are targets for current first-line medications in neuropathic pain. Our aim was to explore its antinociceptive potency in rats developing neuropathic pain evoked by partial sciatic nerve ligation and the mechanisms involved. Acute oral tolperisone restores both the decreased paw pressure threshold and the elevated glutamate level in cerebrospinal fluid in neuropathic rats. These effects were comparable to those of pregabalin, a first-line medication in neuropathy. Tolperisone also inhibits release of glutamate from rat brain synaptosomes primarily by blockade of voltage-dependent sodium channels, although inhibition of calcium channels may also be involved at higher concentrations. However, pregabalin fails to affect glutamate release under our present conditions, indicating a different mechanism of action. These results lay the foundation of the avenue for repurposing tolperisone as an analgesic drug to relieve neuropathic pain.


Subject(s)
Neuralgia , Tolperisone , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Glutamic Acid , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Pregabalin/pharmacology , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Rats , Tolperisone/pharmacology , Tolperisone/therapeutic use
5.
Neurochem Res ; 47(11): 3272-3284, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35945308

ABSTRACT

Phenylephrine (PE) is a canonical α1-adrenoceptor-selective agonist. However, unexpected effects of PE have been observed in preclinical and clinical studies, that cannot be easily explained by its actions on α1-adrenoceptors. The probability of the involvement of α2- and ß-adrenoceptors in the effect of PE has been raised. In addition, our earlier study observed that PE released noradrenaline (NA) in a [Ca2+]o-independent manner. To elucidate this issue, we have investigated the effects of PE on [3H]NA release and α1-mediated smooth muscle contractions in the mouse vas deferens (MVD) as ex vivo preparation. The release experiments were designed to assess the effects of PE at the presynaptic terminal, whereas smooth muscle isometric contractions in response to electrical field stimulation were used to measure PE effect postsynaptically. Our results show that PE at concentrations between 0.3 and 30 µM significantly enhanced the resting release of [3H]NA in a [Ca2+]o-independent manner. In addition, prazosin did not affect the release of NA evoked by PE. On the contrary, PE-evoked smooth muscle contractions were inhibited by prazosin administration indicating the α1-adrenoceptor-mediated effect. When the function of the NA transporter (NAT) was attenuated with nisoxetine, PE failed to release NA and the contractions were reduced by approximately 88%. The remaining part proved to be prazosin-sensitive. The present work supports the substantial indirect effect of PE which relays on the cytoplasmic release of NA, which might explain the reported side effects for PE.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists , Norepinephrine , Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/pharmacology , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/pharmacology , Animals , Cytoplasm , Male , Mice , Norepinephrine/pharmacology , Phenylephrine/pharmacology , Prazosin/pharmacology , Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1
6.
Molecules ; 26(20)2021 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34684749

ABSTRACT

The current protocols for neuropathic pain management include µ-opioid receptor (MOR) analgesics alongside other drugs; however, there is debate on the effectiveness of opioids. Nevertheless, dose escalation is required to maintain their analgesia, which, in turn, contributes to a further increase in opioid side effects. Finding novel approaches to effectively control chronic pain, particularly neuropathic pain, is a great challenge clinically. Literature data related to pain transmission reveal that angiotensin and its receptors (the AT1R, AT2R, and MAS receptors) could affect the nociception both in the periphery and CNS. The MOR and angiotensin receptors or drugs interacting with these receptors have been independently investigated in relation to analgesia. However, the interaction between the MOR and angiotensin receptors has not been excessively studied in chronic pain, particularly neuropathy. This review aims to shed light on existing literature information in relation to the analgesic action of AT1R and AT2R or MASR ligands in neuropathic pain conditions. Finally, based on literature data, we can hypothesize that combining MOR agonists with AT1R or AT2R antagonists might improve analgesia.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Receptors, Angiotensin/drug effects , Receptors, Opioid, mu/drug effects , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Animals , Humans , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Nociception/drug effects , Pain Management/methods , Proto-Oncogene Mas , Receptors, Angiotensin/metabolism , Receptors, Opioid/agonists , Receptors, Opioid, mu/agonists , Receptors, Opioid, mu/metabolism
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(5)2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33804568

ABSTRACT

The limited effect of current medications on neuropathic pain (NP) has initiated large efforts to develop effective treatments. Animal studies showed that glycine transporter (GlyT) inhibitors are promising analgesics in NP, though concerns regarding adverse effects were raised. We aimed to study NFPS and Org-25543, GlyT-1 and GlyT-2 inhibitors, respectively and their combination in rat mononeuropathic pain evoked by partial sciatic nerve ligation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glycine content was also determined by capillary electrophoresis. Subcutaneous (s.c.) 4 mg/kg NFPS or Org-25543 showed analgesia following acute administration (30-60 min). Small doses of each compound failed to produce antiallodynia up to 180 min after the acute administration. However, NFPS (1 mg/kg) produced antiallodynia after four days of treatment. Co-treatment with subanalgesic doses of NFPS (1 mg/kg) and Org-25543 (2 mg/kg) produced analgesia at 60 min and thereafter meanwhile increased significantly the CSF glycine content. This combination alleviated NP without affecting motor function. Test compounds failed to activate G-proteins in spinal cord. To the best of our knowledge for the first time we demonstrated augmented analgesia by combining GlyT-1 and 2 inhibitors. Increased CSF glycine content supports involvement of glycinergic system. Combining selective GlyT inhibitors or developing non-selective GlyT inhibitors might have therapeutic value in NP.


Subject(s)
Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Glycine/cerebrospinal fluid , Hyperalgesia/prevention & control , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Sarcosine/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Hyperalgesia/metabolism , Hyperalgesia/pathology , Male , Motor Activity , Neuralgia/metabolism , Neuralgia/pathology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Sarcosine/pharmacology , Spinal Cord/drug effects , Spinal Cord/metabolism , Spinal Cord/pathology
8.
Brain Res Bull ; 147: 78-85, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738866

ABSTRACT

Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) enzyme is involved in the degradation of many biologically active peptides including opioids. Its role in pain transmission is poorly elucidated. Recently we reported on the spinal antihyperalgesic effects of DPP4 inhibitors, Ile-Pro-Ile (Diprotin A) and vildagliptin in carrageenan-evoked acute inflammatory pain in rats. The present study investigated the effects of intrathecal (it.) diprotin A and vildagliptin in Complete Freund's Adjuvant- (CFA) and formalin induced pain in rats. The former assay can model the subchronic inflammatory pain condition and the later one reflects both acute tonic and inflammatory pain conditions. The involvement of opioid receptor (OR) subtypes, Y1-, and GLP1 receptors were also investigated. In CFA pain model it. diprotin A or vildagliptin dose-dependently inhibits hyperalgesia in ipsilateral while has no effect in contralateral paws. The peak effect was achieved 30 min following drug administration which was used for further analysis. Both compounds showed naltrexone reversible antihyperalgesia. Co-administration of OR-subtype-selective antagonists with diprotin A and vildagliptin revealed involvement of µ and δ > µ opioid receptors, respectively. Co-administered Y1 but not GLP1 receptor antagonists reversed the antihyperalgesic action of both DPP4 inhibitors. In touch-hypersensitivity both compounds were ineffective. In formalin test only diprotin A showed µ and δ OR-mediated antinociception and only in the 2nd phase. This effect was Y1 or GLP-1 receptor antagonist insensitive. In conclusion, diprotin A and vildagliptin display antinociception of different mechanisms of action in subchronic inflammatory pain. Furthermore, the spinal pain relay points of inflammatory pain of acute or subchronic conditions were more effectively affected by diprotin A than vildagliptin which needs future elucidation.


Subject(s)
Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Pain/drug therapy , Vildagliptin/pharmacology , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Animals , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/metabolism , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/pharmacology , Hyperalgesia/metabolism , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/metabolism , Male , Narcotic Antagonists/pharmacology , Oligopeptides/metabolism , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Opioid/metabolism , Receptors, Opioid, mu , Vildagliptin/metabolism
9.
Neurochem Res ; 43(6): 1250-1257, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29725918

ABSTRACT

Opioid analgesics devoid of central side effects are unmet medical need in the treatment of acute pain (e.g. post-operative pain). Recently, we have reported on 14-O-methylmorphine-6-O-sulfate (14-O-MeM6SU), a novel opioid agonist of high efficacy producing peripheral antinociception in subchronic inflammatory pain in certain doses. The present study focused on the antinociceptive effect of 14-O-MeM6SU compared to morphine in formalin test of an early/acute (Phase I) and late/tonic (Phase II) pain phases. Subcutaneous 14-O-MeM6SU (253-1012 nmol/kg) and morphine (3884-31075 nmol/kg) dose dependently reduced the pain behaviors of both phases. Co-administered naloxone methiodide (NAL-M), a peripherally acting opioid antagonist, abolished the antinociceptive effect of 506 nmol/kg 14-O-MeM6SU. On the other hand, the effects of 14-O-MeM6SU (1012 nmol/kg) and morphine (15538 nmol/kg) were only partially affected by NAL-M, indicating the contribution of CNS to antinociception. Locally injected test compounds into formalin treated paws caused antinociception in both phases. Locally effective doses of test compounds were also injected into contralateral paws. Morphine showed effects in both phases, 14-O-MeM6SU in certain doses failed to produce antinociception in either phase. A NAL-M reversible systemic dose of 14-O-MeM6SU and the lowest systemic effective dose of morphine were evaluated for their sedative effects following isoflurane-induced sleeping (righting reflex). In contrast to morphine, 14-O-MeM6SU in certain antinociceptive doses showed no impact on sleeping time. These data highlight that high efficacy opioids of limited CNS penetration in certain doses mitigate somatic and inflammatory pain by targeting MOR at the periphery.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Codeine/analogs & derivatives , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Acute Pain/metabolism , Acute Pain/psychology , Analgesics/chemistry , Analgesics, Opioid/chemistry , Animals , Codeine/administration & dosage , Codeine/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/metabolism , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Pain Measurement/methods , Rats , Rats, Wistar
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...